Note: I've read this book a couple of weeks and my review is based on the notes I took while reading it.
Review:
I have no doubts that "One Bullet Away" by Nathaniel Fick is going to be one, if not the best book, I'm going to read this year. After I finished it, it took me along time to stop thinking about it (actually, I still haven't), and it moved me in a way I didn't expect. And that was before I watched the excellent HBO TV series "Generation Kill", which I highly recommend, btw.
As you may remember, I read and reviewed Evan Wright's "Generation Kill" some time ago. For those of you who don't know the connection, "Generation Kill" covers Wright's time as an embedded journalist with a platoon of recon marines, whose commanding officer was Nathaniel Fick, the author of "One Bullet Away". While I enjoyed "Generation Kill" very much, I also judged it as a book written for an MTV audience - young people with a short attention span and a (however misled) desire for action.
"One Bullet Away" is very very different from "Generation Kill", and not only because it covers Fick's personal journey to becoming a Marine officer and some of his missions before the events in "Generation Kill". It is different, because Fick's accounts, compared to GK, are so, well, unspectacular. He is all rational, planning, calm - where Evans is the terrified and fascinated journalist who sees the heroics of the single man, and not the camaraderie of the team that is so evident in everything that Fick describes. Where Evans watches and describes, Fick thinks (and writes. And people who can truly think are so rarely found these days. (*sigh*)
I was fascinated and confused by the lack of information that Fick describes. He knows, has been taught by the Marine Corps, that you can never have all the intel, so you must act and plan with what you have. For the reader, at least for me as a reader, this was rather unsettling - how can these men make the decision they have to make when they lack so much important information? Hell, I can't even order a pizza if I don't know what kind of cheese is going to be on it!
Fick doesn't describe this lack of intel so much as he just lives it - this became most apparent to me on his first mission to Pakistan and Afghanistan - he and the others around him seem to live in an information vacuum onboard their ship -opinion building? Following the press? Not happening. Nowhere else did it become so evident to me that we have to overcome the (heroic) idea that fighting for one's country means fighting for what one believes in. Fighting for one's country means following orders, making the best of the information one is given - fighting for a policy that in the best case scenario you stand behind, but most of the time, you won't even know. What you have to believe in is the idea of serving your country, although Fick doesn't outright say that in this book (but he does so in later articles).
And I'm not saying this to make it worth less - the opposite is the case. But it is a truth, and I think it is an important truth to know in order to be able to understand any kind of war. And it makes perfect sense from a military POV: you can't have everyone doing what they think is best - you need them to do what they are told to do. Fick doesn't complain about this, in fact he doesn't seem to object to this. What does make him decide to leave the Corps in the end is the price you pay for being part of the chain of command - you send men to war and they will get killed, and as a commanding officer, no matter how little information you've been given by your superiors, no matter if you believe in the policy you are fighting for or not - this is going to be your responsibility.
This had quite an impact on me, the fact that for Fick, for anyone else right there, it's not about good or bad or right or wrong - it's about survival. It's as basic as that.
And honestly, I don't know how this makes me feel - there are people fighting out there who are excellent at their jobs - but all they do depends on the words of some policy makers in Washington- What if the policy is wrong? Fick doesn't answer this question -he doesn't even ask it. But I don't think you can read this book without thinking about it.
That is not to say that Fick is uninformed. On the contrary -even though he skips the details, Fick mentions and describes again and again the meticulous planning that goes into preparing missions and giving orders: the intelligence gathering, the officer meetings, the ordering, assembling and (re-)checking of equipment -all parts that are virtually non-existent in Evan's book. Where GK sometimes seems to be about a bunch of guys who took an armed roadtrip in Iraq for their Spring break, OBA shows that - overall agenda or not (see above) - these people actually seemed to know what they were doing. And in addition to his excellent personal descriptions of his life as a Marine officer, the book also provides a lot of factual information of the work of the Marine Corps and its officers.
And then there is the fact that from everything else I've read not about, but from Nate Fick since then (for those who don't know, he's the CEO of the think tank CNAS), he seems to be one of the more intelligent people out there, and I agree with mostly everything he says (plus he writes so compellingly that I would happily read his shopping list, and enjoy doing so), and I could never resist really good, intelligent reasoning. It turns me on. Yes, really. (but that's beside the point, maybe)
Anyway, I found this book very very impressive. It is well-written and informative, but it is also personal and heartfelt. I am a bit ashamed to admit that I didn't expect Fick to be such a good writer (I only read his other articles and interviews after I read OBA) and was therefore surprised that I liked this book even better than I had hoped to like it. I have since learned that OBA is required reading for many Marine officers, and I find that decision fully justified.
An important book that I highly, HIGHLY recommend to everyone who is even the least bit interested in the subject.