Actual rating 3.5
It’s been a long while since I reviewed a book that wasn’t an ARC, but I had too many thoughts to get out about The Darkness Outside Us to let it be.
So here we are.
Overall, I enjoyed reading this book. I’ll put that out there before I start properly reviewing it. Yes, the first 40% or so was a little rocky, but once the end of part one hit, I was fully invested. It’s less a romance (as implied by the blurb. Honestly, publishing needs to get its act together on marketing), and more a space thriller, and one of those ones that’ll make you go oh fuck at points. None of that was where my issues lay though.
I’m splitting this review into three parts: the worldbuilding, the plot, and the characters/relationship. These are probably going in decreasing importance for how they affected my rating, i.e. the worldbuilding was the big one, and the characters were pretty much negligible in comparison. But all of them contributed to the 3.5 star rating.
The worldbuilding.
First up is how I felt about the futuristic world that was being built up. I think it’s fair to say this is probably the reason I found the first 40% rocky, since a lot of the worldbuilding was expanded on then. As the book wore on, and the mystery came into play, there was less and less focus on it, probably contributing to my increased enjoyment.
That being said.
The primary thing you notice about the worldbuilding is the pseudo-Cold War society. On the one hand, you have the Féderation, Ambrose’s society, and on the other, the Dimokratía, where Kodiak comes from. The former is pseudo-USA, a society presented as progressive and forward-thinking, utopian and capitalist. The latter is pseudo-Russia, focused heavily on physical prowess—potential spacefarers go through a lot of physical tasks aimed at weeding out the weak (unlike the Féderation, who assess through exams)—and framed as backwards and bigoted, misogynistic because men are the only spacefarers and old-fashioned for using labels to describe sexuality (I mention this specifically because I’ll bring it up again later).
And it’s not like these countries aren’t meant to be specifically associated with their real world counterparts. There’s a brief attempt at confronting imperialist USA—a comment about how the Féderation’s war crimes in the Philippines aren’t “cold war bullshit”—but it’s immediately countered by “but the Dimokratía have also committed war crimes”. And that’s it. Never mentioned again. I thought at the start, that perhaps the main character’s naivete (and judgement) was merely a product of having been brought up in the Féderation, that it would later get confronted and torn apart. But it never did. Instead, all this worldbuilding faded into the background as the mystery took precedence.
I’m not saying that’s necessarily the wrong way to go, of course. The story is about the mystery, about two individuals who hate each other, isolated in space and forced to work together. I get that. But why would you introduce that worldbuilding if you’re not going to confront it at all? Because throughout it all—and even despite the reveals—the Féderation are good, the Dimokratía are bad. It was, on the whole, unnuanced in that respect.
I think this is well-illustrated when the topic of labels for sexuality is brought up. Firstly, I have no real issue with futuristic books simply choosing not to use labels—I think linguistically it makes little sense, but I’ll shrug that off because there are plenty of contemporary ones which do the same. What I disliked here was the framing of their continued use as “backwards”, equated with a society that was still misogynistic and homophobic (although Kodiak never gives Ambrose reason to believe he is homophobic, so the number of times Ambrose accused him of homophobia, even while Kodiak was talking about relationships with men? A little weird, but I digress). I think this is mostly because, to me reading in 2021, we still live in a society where claiming those labels is an act of pride and/or resistance. So the sneery tone this book took, about those who continued to use them (albeit a long way in the future), didn’t sit right.
The plot.
Regarding the plot, this will be pretty brief, but let me start with the positives. The mystery was very well done. From the end of the first part onwards, the tension was high, the plot twists mostly caught you off guard (I did partly guess one, but I think that was more me spitballing, not because it was blindingly obvious), and I got very involved in reading it to find out what would happen next.
And that kept me engaged until the end, despite the slight petering out of tension once it was clear what was going on (although given the plot that could hardly be helped). I would say though, because of the need to repeat parts like it did (I’m trying to describe this in a non-spoilery way), it seemed to move along in a way that affected the character and relationship development. It’s almost like it needed to cut part one down, and have a few more parts where they don’t yet know what’s going on, just to build more suspense. And to delay the relationship forming.
And this also brings me to point three.
The characters/relationship.
As I said, this is probably a consequence of the way the plot was structured. Because the first part at least had to span a fair while to set everything up, the relationship development seemed to happen quite abruptly. I think this is probably because of the fact there were so many small timeskips, but they weren’t done in a way that was necessarily obvious. So it went from something like Kodiak refusing to eat meals with Ambrose, to suddenly he’s eating them and having conversations.
Tie into that the fact there were a few times where the narrative said something like, Kodiak doesn’t talk much, or Kodiak is standoffish, and then the next thing Kodiak does is entirely contradictory? Again though, I do think this was just a product of the plot pacing. And as I said at the start, I’m going through points in an order where they progressively less impacted my rating, so this one, right down here, is pretty low.
Overall, though, as I said up top, I did enjoy this book. It had a slow start, yes, but once I got into it I was properly engaged by it. I do think, however, like many others on here, that this could have stood to be not a YA book.