There are two books in this series, and I read the second one first because it was easier to get hold of. I’m not sure whether it’s simply a case of too much of a good thing, and whether I would always have been slightly less keen on whichever volume I read last, but I didn’t enjoy this instalment quite as much. A note at the front invites readers to send in suggestions for the next book, and I wonder whether that worked to its advantage. Volume 1 is samey at times: we get entries on 22 of Bette Davis's films, for example. Perhaps in Volume 2, the author, faced with some unfamiliar selections, engaged his powers of wit and analysis more fully (I think he did). In this book, the criticism occasionally seems somewhat rote and the jokes rather obvious. Roen even rules on whether some of the titles are actually ‘good’ or not, which hardly seems the point in this kind of undertaking. None the less, he still provides the reader with plenty of quotable observations:
Camp - especially gay camp - is seldom found in the film noir format. I have a theory as to why this is so. Film noir, you see, is the only genre in which homosexuals and homosexuality are dealt with in a more or less overt fashion (although there’s always a certain amount of coding in order to get round the censor).
The action [of Querelle] transpires on campy, blatantly artificial sets straight out of an M-G-M musical from the Forties.
[Rudolph Valentino's] eyes have an almost reptilian cool…
I was also glad to have new ideas for further study: I’m already three-quarters of the way through The Adventures of Captain Marvel on YouTube, to which he attributes ‘a relentless homoeroticism, utterly charming in its juvenile naivité.’ I agree: it is charming.