What do you think?
Rate this book
124 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 1984
"Not long after we had set to our task, myattitude to the work had struck a teasing balance between exasperation and enthralment. On the exasperating side fell all the author's obvious artistic strategies. As literary diversion, these were often highly successful. He combined a Ciceronian amplitude of style, a sonorous gentility of phrase, with an almost incantatory use of repetition and adumbration, which endowed the prose with a menacing, echosome quality. But precisely this excellence of artistry and effect disqualified the work as a source of the vital empirical data that we urgently needed for our counter-assault on our vague, unspeakable enemy. And as for the tales' substantial actions, they involved a pantheon of malign entities which had a similarly 'invented' quality, their names clearly chosen for a threatening dissonance, or in an effort to produce a phonetic facsimile of certain names in established mythology.huh... 'a Ciceronian amplitude of style'! that's a first.
But on the side of enthralment was something both far more vague, and at the same time far more persuasive, than these considerations. For, as a pointillist's technical strategy aims at an unreal idiom which, seen from the right distance, conveys new realities of light, so did Lovecraft's narratives reveal, through an artificial idiom of fantasy, the true quality and meaning of the horror we had encountered. The precise psychological posture of that unique kind of dread, where awareness cringes from the first exploring touch, the first tenderly probing palpation of alien Entity, alien hunger - this was Lovecraft's special preserve..."