Ce livre est une oeuvre du domaine public éditée au format numérique par Ebooks libres et gratuits. L’achat de l’édition Kindle inclut le téléchargement via un réseau sans fil sur votre liseuse et vos applications de lecture Kindle.
Verne wrote about space, air, and underwater travel before people invented navigable aircraft and practical submarines and devised any means of spacecraft. He ranks behind Dame Agatha Mary Clarissa Christie as the second most translated author of all time. People made his prominent films. People often refer to Verne alongside Herbert George Wells as the "father of science fiction."
This book, one of Jules Verne's posthumous novels, was originally published in a form severely rewritten by Verne's son under the title "The Survivors of the Jonathan," which I read about ten years ago. Verne's original version was not published in France until 1985 and this English translation came out in 2002.
After reading the original I can see why Verne's publisher requested that Michel Verne do a rewrite. Verne's original manuscript was a departure in many ways from everything else he had every published. Before achieving prominence through his novels, Verne's ly writings were for the stage where he learned scene and character development. In this opus he casts much of that aside dealing only with the development of the main character, Kaw-djer, a man who has abandoned the world at large compelled by his firm belief in passive anarchism and the freedom of the human spirit.
Verne place Kaw-djer at the far end of the South American continent where long standing border disputes between Chile and Argentina leave the isles of Cape Horn free from governmental interference. He then sets loose a series of events, including a border treaty and a shipwreck of immigrants bound for Africa that has Kaw-djer wrestling with the practical applications of his beliefs. All other characters in the novel are merely silhouettes set up as pinball levers to knock Kaw-djer's philosophies about.
The book has very little in terms of detailed scene work, but is presented mostly as historical narrative. Anyone determined to turn this novel into motion picture would have to create whole piece scenes to reflect what Verne conveys through his sparse expression. In the end the book reads more like social analysis through a fictional community than like a novel, but this actually serves to strengthen the book. Only those readers too tied too their expectations of what a Verne novel should be would be disappointed.
In the long run, although it was rewritten to appease the tastes of Verne's fans, Michel Verne's version comes off as fluff when compared to the original. Indeed, in its departure from the standard Verne fare, "Magellania" demonstrates an experienced writer dealing with serious issues in a mature manner making this the grand capstone of Jules Verne's literary career.
Sorprende descubrir la cantidad de diferencias entre esta novela y la versión adaptada por el hijo de Verne en Los naufragos del Jonathan. No solo la trama es muy diferente si no que los personajes son distintos (Hay muchos menos), el discurso político es mucho más radical y más explícito (El Verne más reaccionario) y el tono en general es mucho menos optimista y tiene el punto de amargura de esos últimos años del autor. Otras características que se mantienen es lo prolijo de las descripciones y la cantidad de información que caracteriza la obra de Verne pero la acción es bastante menor y la resolución de los conflictos bastante elíptica (Con la excepción de la portentosa escena del naufragio) En cualquier caso, es un texto interesante y que refleja muy bien la mentalidad del autor en sus últimos años.
Η ιστορία είχε ενδιαφέρον και ο χαρακτήρας του Καβ-Τζερ ήταν πολύ καλογραμμένος, ωστόσο το βιβλίο ήταν αρκετά προβλέψιμο και σε μερικά σημεία τραβούσε περισσότερο από όσο θα ήθελα. Παρ' όλ' αυτά μου άρεσε και το προτείνω σε όλους 3,5/5.
Kaw-djer, an anarchist sick of humanity, has stationed himself at the edges of the world where no country lays claim to land. A couple countries, however, are starting to intrude his space. Things get worse when a ship gets stranded and Kaw-djer is left with hundreds of people who seek his guidance. Will the countries claim the land? How will Kaw-djer respond to the people who are stranded with him? Will he succumb and help them or will he hold on to his solitude and anarchist ideas and abandon them? A great novel by Jules Verne! In this book, Verne explores whether anarchy is feasible. There are great themes and topics covered including politics, freedom, exploration and geography, social relations, philanthropy, and colonialism. There are a couple unfortunate cringe-worthy racist moments, but besides that I really enjoyed the book.
If you're a fan of adventure and exploration, Jules Verne is definitely an author you should have on your reading list. This book is no exception, with Verne's signature writing style and a captivating story.
While the book is unfinished, it has been expertly restored, and the story is still an enjoyable read. Verne's attention to detail and ability to transport readers to another time and place are evident throughout.
I particularly enjoyed the characters and their dynamic as they navigate the challenges of their situation. It's clear that Verne put a lot of thought into each character's backstory and motivations.
Overall, "The Survivors of the 'Jonathan'" is a great example of Jules Verne's work and a must-read for fans of his writing. It left me eager to read more of his books and explore even more of his fascinating worlds.
I highly recommend this book to anyone looking for an engaging adventure story with a touch of science fiction.
Βιβλίο που ξεκινάει από την πρώτη σελίδα με την κραυγή του Καβ-τζερ "Ούτε θεός ούτε αφέντης!" δεν μπορεί να είναι κακό. Και όντως ο Βερν σε βάζει σε έναν πολύ απλό προβληματισμό. Μπορεί ένας αριθμός από ναυαγούς σε ένα έρημο νησί να φτιάξει μια κοινωνία χωρίς εξουσία; Είναι εφικτό; Ή η εκμετάλλευση και η αναζήτηση του αρχηγού είναι ριζωμένη μέσα μας; Εξουσία, λοιπόν, για το καλό των πολλών; Είναι όντως αυτή η μοναδική επιλογή; Ένα ωραίο βιβλίο που δεν κρύβει τις δυσκολίες που μπορεί να έχει η ουτοπία που θέλουμε να φτιάξουμε.
Στους "Ναυαγούς του Ιωνάθαν" που δημοσιεύτηκε μετά το θάνατό του ο Βερν πρωτοτυπεί με τον εαυτό του. Η γνώριμη περιπέτεια υπάρχει αλλά το θέμα του κ δεν είναι η επιστημονική φαντασία και εξερεύνηση αλλά η πολιτική αναζήτηση της εποχής του.
I had a hard time getting into this book as the main event didn't happen until halfway through and there was quite a bit of overt racism in the first few pages. Once the picked up, it was hard to put down. An excellent story about a truly independent man (both from society and any power) forced back into civilization.
(60) Les Naufragés du "Jonathan" (The Survivors of the "Jonathan", 1909) (2 volumes) 142K words
The 60th Extraordinary Voyage, the sixth one published posthumously, takes place in the southern tip of South America, in the region around the Straits of Magellan. We had been in this same part of the world a few novels ago, in "The Lighthouse at the End of the World". Curiously, b0th novels involve the construction of a new lighthouse to help ships in those dangerous waters, although this time that's just a side plot.
First read or reread?: First read for me.
What is it about?: An enigmatic man has chosen to live far from civilization in the region around the Straits of Magellan. He only uses the name Kaw-djer, which was given to him by the indigenous people of the area, as a token of respect and recognition for the help he is always willing to lend, using his knowledge of medicine. Kaw-djer, a philosophical anarchist whose motto is "Neither God nor master", assists a group of settlers who end up being shipwrecked on a nearby island (Hoste Island). When the settlers receive an offer to establish a colony right there, Kaw-djer remains with them. Despite his exceptional knowledge and charisma, he refuses to accept a position of authority. However, as the colony begins to fall apart, Kaw-djer is forced to choose between his own principles and the well-being of his friends.
This is another book that was heavily modified by Michel Verne, to get it ready for publication. Jules Verne's manuscript (which has been published recently with the title "Magellania"), is half the length and supplies little detail, mostly giving an outline like a history book and only developing the character of Kaw-djer. Michel made the story much more detailed and introduced many characters.
One goodreads reviewer calls Magellania (Jules' original manuscript) the work of "an experienced writer dealing with serious issues in a mature manner", and calls Michel's additions fluff. I have to disagree. For me, fleshing up the story and letting us share it with the characters does not dilute the underlying psychological conflict of the main character. On the contrary, for me those ideas are strengthened if they are integrated in a solid story. Then again, I like plot, that's why I read Verne.
Be that as it may, I found Kaw-djer quite intriguing, joining the ranks of Verne's best characters, with the likes of Nemo, Paganel or Phileas Fogg.
With Michel's changes, this becomes an adventure novel in Verne's usual style, but still remains a political one. Verne always had a soft spot for oppressed nations that were fighting for their freedom, but here he examines questions like the legitimacy of governments of any kind. He treats anarchist ideas with respect (the anarchist Kaw-djer is morally ahead of most people) but, just like communism, Verne's position seems to be that on paper they can be admirable ideas, but if put in practice they prove to be incompatible with human nature and lead to disaster.
There is a large cast of characters, many of whom were created by Michel. I was amused to see two of them (the young boys Dick and Sand), whose names are a shout-out to the main character of "Dick Sand, A Captain at Fifteen". It's interesting, because Dick Sand, the teenage captain, has been interpreted as Verne's image of an ideal son, as opposed to his actual son Michel who, at that time, had a very conflictive relationship with his father (later the two of them would become closer). I wonder if Michel was aware of that interpretation, and if so how he felt about it.
This novel closes Verne's cycle of Robinson stories, and I think he did a good job of not repeating himself. We have "The Mysterious Island", an epic story that plays a central role in Verne's mythology; the humorous "Godfrey Morgan"; "Two Years' Vacation", with a group of boys as the castaways who handle their situation and internal conflicts much better than the ones in Golding's Lord of the Flies; "The Castaways of the Flag", perhaps the closest one to "The Survivors of the Jonathan" since it also deals with the creation of an island colony as the aftermath of a shipwreck, even though it takes a different, less political approach...
Apart from the examination of political philosophies, what distinguishes this novel from other Verne Robinsonades is the large number of people involved in the shipwreck (the Jonathan is a large, four-masted clipper), which makes for a less manageable society. Inevitably, the organization of such a settlement becomes a political matter rather than being based on personal relationships. Still, the conflict between the Kaw-djer's ideas and the political reality remains the highlight.
This was mostly a riveting read. Perhaps the story is longer than it needed to be (the invasion arc could easily have been removed), and I found unlikely that Chile would be willing to offer independence to the colony, no matter how much they wished to encourage colonization of the area. On the other hand, I found the gold rush arc enjoyable and finally Jules Verne's condemnation of gold and greed becomes explicit (it was also present in "The Golden Volcano", but the message was lost with Michel's changes).
Enjoyment factor: I enjoyed this one a lot, even if it's not perfect. I had been afraid that the posthumous novels would be disappointing, but that hasn't been the case so far, and I think they could be favorably compared to, for example, the last few novels published within Jules Verne's lifetime.
I had a hard time starting out on this book. It didn't pull me in right away and I found myself forcing my way through it. Once things started to pick up, I really enjoyed the story it told and the ideas it was designed to give to the reader. I'd recommend it but be weary that it may not hook as quickly as some of Verne's other pieces.
This story could be described as a lengthy parable that will ultimately lead the reader to conclude that a higher authority is necessary for the peace and welfare of all. 'The needs of the many.' - Star Trek 😉
Truly a misunderstood work of literature by Jules Verne. Here Verne presents the story of an individual man's soul through allegory. Such a richly narrated and compiled story, intricately woven around politics and conflict hiding the inner conflict of the possession of a man's soul (his own absolution from sin and "independence").
"Neither God nor master!" to "God!" In these simple words from start to finish, Verne describes "Religion" contrasting "Faith"; the former being the construct of man, while the latter being held by every single individual. The rightful authority of man over one's own soul. It is an allegory denouncing churches (which is probably why Michel was pressured to rewrite the story into what it became) and their long held authority over your everlasting soul.
Our main character Kaw-djer, with no shared past (presenting the ideal of forgiveness of past sins which should have no influence on your character, present or future; absolution meaning no more judgement can be made against you) continually searches for "isolation" from authority (not necessarily solitude as Michel writes). His past is not important to the story at all. Even those he shares sentiments with, only sees him for who he is (and what his heart does). He is always simple "Kaw-djer" (friend, benefactor and savior). In the end, creating a lighthouse... ("showing the way" and staving off danger, as he reconnects with God.)
One of the main themes in this story is of political contrasts between the nations of Chile and Argentina. It is this political infighting the sets up the allegory (presenting the simple comparison to the varying churches and affiliations Verne mentions throughout the story; an authority of church, something created by the hand man alone.) dominating over any land they come across and exerting its will upon the peoples of that land.
Finally, the gold. The likeness to idolatry (golden idols). Even this element is then presented as yet another contrast to authority over one's soul (whether your own or a church's).
All in all a rich read and I'm glad for having read the original manuscript over the revised one created by his son. From my understanding, Jules Verne wrote this during some considerations of actual death within his own life. So it stands to reason he wanted to speak out for those who couldn't really see...
"Freewill, you are the master of your own soul..." (don't let anyone else stand in the way of you and God)
Un animal graţios, cu gâtul lung elegant arcuit, cu crupa plină, picioare nervoase, lungi şi subţiri, părul roşcat bălţat cu alb, cu coadă scurtă, egretă stufoasă de păr. Numele lui localnic: guanaco; în româneşte: guanac[1]. Văzute de departe, rumegătoarele acestea dau deseori iluzia că ar fi cai cu călăreţi în spate, şi mulţi călători s-au lăsat înşelaţi de aparenţa aceasta, luând drept o ceată de călăreţi câte una dintre turmele lor învălmăşite în galop năvalnic la orizont. Unică fiinţă vie vizibilă în regiunea aceea pustie, guanacul de care este vorba în rândurile de faţă, se opri pe creasta unei coline pierdute în mijlocul unei prerii întinse în care trestiile foşâiau zgomotos, tremurându-şi vârfurile ascuţite deasupra tufelor de mărăciniş. Cu botul în vânt, aspira adierile uşoare ale unui vântuleţ din est. Câmpia era brăzdată ici şi colo de râpele formate de ploile furtunoase care scrijeliseră pretutindeni solul moale. Adăpostit de una dintre adâncăturile acestea, la o mică depărtare de colină, un indian se apropia neobservat de guanacul nostru. Aproape gol, acoperit doar cu câteva petece de blană, înainta pe tăcute, târându-se pe iarbă în aşa fel ca să nu sperie vânatul pe care îl ochise. Cu toate acestea însă, animalul simţea apropierea primejdiei şi începuse să dea semne de nelinişte. Deodată, un lasou se auzi şuierând prin aer. Ţintită asupra animalului, fâşia subţire de piele nu-şi atinse obiectivul; alunecă pe crupă şi căzu. Lovitura dăduse greş. Guanacul o rupse la fugă. Când indianul ajunse în vârful colinei, vânatul dispăruse în tufişurile din apropiere. Dar dacă guanacul era în afară de orice primejdie, nu tot aşa stăteau lucrurile şi cu omul. După ce strânse lasoul, al cărui capăt era prins la cingătoare, indianul se pregătea tocmai să coboare, când un răget furios izbucni la câţiva paşi de el şi în aceeaşi clipă o fiară se repezi asupra lui.
Esta gran obra de Verne, de casi 450 páginas, nos narra la vida del Kaw-Djwer, así nombrado por los índigenas de la tierra del fuego. Este, es un anarquista que vive libre de toda ley y gobierno en la Magallania. Todo cambiará el día en el que llegue un barco( el Jonathan) que naufragará en la Magallania. A partir de este punto, lo naúfragos de dicho barco harán dudar al Kaw-Djer sobre sus principios anarquistas y sus creencias sobre la naturaleza del ser human. El punto álgido de la historia ocurre cuando dicho protagonista toma las riendas y decide crear una colonia bien organizada, con un gobierno cuyo jefe es él mismo.
Aunque sea una novela contiene fragmentos que nos hacen reflexionar sobre algunos temas más bien filosóficos, políticos e incluso antropológicos. Sinceramente es una historia triste, de madurez emocional que nos hace pensar sobre el egoísmo del ser humano. Además esta es muy llevadera ya que no deja de ser una novela de aventuras. Su único punto débil es la monotonía seguida en algunos capítulos que describen cada invierno en la isla.
Recomendada a adultos mayormente y a los jóvenes que busquen una novela que les haga reflexionar.
Towards the end of his life the tone of many of Verne’s works became dark and introspective. This is even more evident in this work, Magellania, a novel that was originally published by his son after significant revisions under the title “The Survivors of the Jonathan”. This version, untouched by his son or his editor, deals intimately with issues of colonialism, capitalism and self dependence. Though characters who are voluntary exiles wrestling with the idea of being subjugated to a master or a nation are nothing new in Verne’s works (e.g. captain Nemo, Robur the Conqueror, etc…) these attributes are on full display in the main character of Magellania, Kaw-Djer.
A Vernesque story of the struggles, both personal and societal, of a man who wishes to be "neither God nor master" but becomes one reluctantly when his conscience leaves him no choice but to act. Wonderful saga, especially for Jules Verne fans.
August - Sâmbătă, 08: "Kav-gerul clătină din cap cu un aer foarte puțin convins. Știa bine basmul acesta etern. Imperfecțiunea omenească, inegalitatea înnăscută, acestea sunt veșnicile scuze invocate de cei ce vor să justifice asuprirea și nedreptățile"
Το βιβλίο αυτό είναι ένα κλασικό, επικό μυθιστόρημα περιπέτειας του Ιουλίου Βερν, το οποίο εξερευνά τη ζωή μιας ετερόκλητης ομάδας ναυαγών που βρίσκονται αποκλεισμένοι σε ένα ακατοίκητο και αφιλόξενο αρχιπέλαγος κοντά στο Ακρωτήριο Χορν. Η ιστορία ξεκινά με το ναυάγιο του πλοίου "Ιωνάθαν" και παρακολουθεί τις προσπάθειες των επιζώντων να οργανωθούν, να επιβιώσουν και να δημιουργήσουν μια νέα κοινωνία από το μηδέν, χωρίς τους νόμους και τους θεσμούς του πολιτισμένου κόσμου. Κεντρικό ρόλο στην αφήγηση έχει ο μυστηριώδης χαρακτήρας που ονομάζεται Καύδαλος (Kaw-djer), ένας άνθρωπος που αρχικά απορρίπτει κάθε μορφή ηγεσίας και οργάνωσης, αλλά τελικά αναγκάζεται να αναλάβει δράσ�� για το κοινό καλό, θέτοντας το ερώτημα κατά πόσο μια κοινωνία μπορεί να λειτουργήσει χωρίς κανόνες. Το βιβλίο υπενθυμίζει με έναν συναρπαστικό τρόπο πώς οι άνθρωποι αντιδρούν σε ακραίες συνθήκες και πώς η ανάγκη για επιβίωση μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε απρόσμενες συμμαχίες και ηγεσίες. Ο Ιούλιος Βερν αναδεικνύει το πώς η θέληση, η ευρηματικότητα και η συνεργασία είναι τα πιο σημαντικά εργαλεία για την αντιμετώπιση της φύσης και των δυσκολιών. Το μήνυμα είναι βαθύ: η κοινωνία είναι απαραίτητη για την επιβίωση, αλλά η μορφή της μπορεί να επαναπροσδιοριστεί από την αρχή. Η αφήγηση κυλάει ομαλά, με έναν σταθερό ρυθμό που χτίζει την ένταση και το σασπένς. Η γλώσσα είναι προσβάσιμη, με ωραίες περιγραφές των αφιλόξενων τοπίων του Ακρωτηρίου Χορν. Πρόκειται για ένα ανάγνωσμα που, αν και έχει περάσει τόσος καιρός από τη συγγραφή του, παραμένει γοητευτικό και επίκαιρο. Οι χαρακτήρες είναι ενδιαφέροντες και καλά δομημένοι. Ο Καύδαλος ξεχωρίζει ως ένας πολύπλοκος αντι-ήρωας, ένας αναρχικός που τελικά αναλαμβάνει την ηγεσία, με εσωτερικές συγκρούσεις και βάθος. Είναι ένα διαχρονικό έργο που υπενθυμίζει τη σημασία της οργάνωσης, της συνεργασίας και της ανθρωπιάς, ακόμα και στις πιο αντίξοες συνθήκες. Μια ιστορία που, αν και γράφτηκε πριν από πολλά χρόνια, παραμένει επίκαιρη και μαγική, προσφέροντας ένα λογοτεχνικό ταξίδι που αξίζει να ζήσει κανείς. Σίγουρα θα σας καθηλώσει με την πλοκή του.
Kitap, kaw-djel adlı kişinin o dönemde (1800'lerin sonu) tek bağımsız topraklar olarak gördüğü Macellanya'daki yaşamını anlatıyor. Bu topraklara bağımsızlık için gelmesine karşın kısa süre sonra toprakların bağımsızlığı ellerinden alınıyor ve maceramız da böyle başlıyor. Ya yeni bir bağımsız toprak bulacak ya da bu dünyadan gidecektir.
Yazar, hikayenin başlarında Macellan Boğazı'nın keşif serüvenini, İngiliz- İspanyol koloni savaşını-ki İngiltere'ye bolca gönderme yapıyor, yerli halkın yamyamlığını anlattığı "tarihi coğrafya" bölümü de eklemiş-ki ben bunlara değinmesine sevindim. Çünkü bölgeyle ilgili hiç bilgim yoktu. Bu bilgilerden dolayı biraz da asıl olaylar kitabın sonlarına doğru gerçekleşiyor.
Özgür yaşam ve bağımsızlık konularını böyle kısa bir kitapta çok iyi işlediğini düşünüyorum. Bu yaşama imrenmemek elde değil.
"-Bu derece insanca bir iş yapmakta olduğunuz bu ülkeye bağlılık duymanızı ve bu kabilelerin arasına dönmek istemenizi anlıyorum. Onlar için bir Tanrı'sınız siz... -Bir Tanrı... dedi Kaw-djer. Neden Tanrı?... İyilik yapmak için insan olmak yeterliyken."
Okunmuş olması gereken değerli bir eser. Ama jules verne'ün diğer macera dolu kitaplarının heyecanını beklememek lazım. Daha çok ideoloji ve inançla ilgili, o da çok üzerine derinlemesine fikirler beyan etmeyen bir kitap. Tabi bunu yanında sosyolojik bir yapılanmayı incelemesi ve belli bir bölgenin adeta tarihini anlatması bakımından da güzel. Ama son döneminde yazmış verne. Hatta anladığım kadarıyla son kitabı (veya son bir iki tanesinden biri). O yüzden eksiği çok, tamamlanmamış ve oğlu tarafından biraz taciz edilmiş bir kitap olması da taslak havasından kurtulamasınıa neden olmuş. Jules verne'ü "bilim kurgu" kategorisinde değerlendiren kitledenseniz bunun daha çok coğrafya ile ilgili bir eser olduğunu da hatırlatayım ve tekrar okunması gereken ama az sayfa sayısına rağmen zorlayan bir kitap olduğunu da belirteyim.
Bu kitap Jules Verne'den okumuş olduğum bilmem kaçıncı kitap..
Yazarımız bu kitabında standart yazım tarzından uzaklaşmış, anarşist birini kaleme almıştır. Bu kişi günümüzde Arjantin ve Şili'nin Güneyinde yer alan Macellan adasında yaşıyor ve de devletlere ve otoritelere mesafeli davranıyor, adada ve çevre adalarda yaşayanların yardımına her zaman hazır aykırı biri. Peki bu kişinin sonrakı düşüncelerini değiştiren şey ne oluyor ? Neden mevcut anarşist kişiliğini terkediyor ? Bu kitabı benim gibi sıkı Verne hayranlarının okumasını tavsiye ederim. Fazla betimlemelerin olması normalde aksiyon dolu kitabları okumuş olanlara sıkıcı gelebilir belki de.
I read the introduction before I read the book, an activity I would have assumed was logical. However in this case the author of the introduction gave away the story as well as gave their interpretation of the actions of the main character. I won't say it ruined the book for me as I still really enjoyed it. However it didn't leave much for my imagination or my intellect. Henceforth I intend to read books first and introductions last just in case it happens again. And raspberries for publisher and the person who wrote the introduction.
Typical of writing of the period the recovered original manuscript tells of the settling of an island off the tip of South America. Told in the story of a lone man of unknown origins who was in search of a place where he would have no master and be beholden to no government or deity he ends up being the head man of an island of immigrants that he rescued from a foundering ship. The story abounds with historical, geographical and ecological information described in the language of the period. A interesting read, but I was happy it was not a long book.