Naming Colonialism: History and Collective Memory in the Congo, 1870-1960

by Osumaka Likaka, Thomas Spear (Editor), David Henige (Editor)

What's in a name? As Osumaka Likaka argues in this illuminating study, the names that Congolese villagers gave to European colonizers reveal much about how Africans experienced and reacted to colonialism. The arrival of explorers, missionaries, administrators, and company agents allowed Africans to observe Westerners' physical appearances, behavior, and cultural practices at close range-resulting in often trenchant critiques. Adapting long-standing conventions about the naming of strangers, inhabitants of the Congo translated their observations into nicknames that both encapsulated the identities of individual Europeans and reflected colonial conditions more broadly. By naming Europeans, Likaka argues, Africans turned a universal practice into a mnemonic local system, which recorded and preserved the village's observations, interpretations, and understandings of colonialism as pithy verbal expressions that were easy to remember and transmit across localities, regions, and generations. As both outside readers point out, Likaka's exploration of naming practices represents a methodological innovation. Drawn from both the colonial archive and oral interviews, the names he analyzes form a rich, largely untapped body of evidence detailing daily life under colonial rule. In some cases, the significance of a name is readily apparent from the translation. The vivid epithets Congolese gave to rubber company agents, for instance-the home burner, Leopard, Beat, beat, The hippopotamus-hide whip-clearly convey the violence that underpinned colonial extractive economies. Other names were subtler, hinting at derogatory meaning by way of riddles, metaphors, or symbols. Expressions complimentary on the surface, Likaka shows, could either flatter or undermine, or do both simultaneously. In the hands of disgruntled villagers, the moniker Bwana Mzuri (Mister Handsome) was less a comment on the recipient's good looks than an underhanded remark about the emasculated manhood of a typical European bureaucrat. In a society that resisted monogamy, Mondele Madami (A Man Who Is Always with His Wife) reflected similar contempt for Western ways. Reconstructing the social history of rural Congolese society through their naming habits requires, of course, a thorough understanding of both linguistic and cultural context. Midst the complexities inherent in this subject matter-the multiplicity of languages spoken in Central Africa, the inadequate translations handed down by some sources, the new or competing connotations that have accrued with the passage of time-Likaka encounters a welter of coded fragments. Through careful research and detailed analysis, he deftly teases out meaning. Naming, he finds, allowed the Congolese to express their concerns and recount their own experiences. Africans thus emerge from this study as autonomous actors whose capacity to observe, categorize, and evaluate reverses our usual optic, providing a critical window on colonialism in its local and regional dimensions. As the sample text makes clear, this manuscript will require a close edit to remedy the syntactic and stylistic infelicities that often characterize writing by authors whose native language is something other than English. More immediately, Likaka has embraced the recommendation of series editor Tom Spear to divide several of the work's longish chapters, at logical junctures, into more cohesive units-a very manageable task that we expect him to complete in short order. To ensure high-quality results, Spear will work closely with Likaka as he wraps up the manuscript, with the goal of publishing it in our series Africa and the Diaspora no later than Fall 2009.

Genres: History, Nonfiction, Africa

233 pages, Kindle Edition

First published December 8, 2009

Reviews

[Karen · Rating 3 out of 5]

In 2009 Osumaka Likaka, set out to prove his adviser wrong that "...we cannot write history out of short words and phrases." (pg.5) While he certainly proved his adviser wrong on one score, if by "history" he actually meant "book," I'd have to agree! This work is a prime example of an academic piece that should have remained a lengthy article. Even at 162 pages, which is about 100 pages less than a typical historical monograph,it's still more than 100 pages too long for the information Likaka had at his disposal. The amount of repetition and obvious conclusions he had to use to pad out the book is on the verge of ridiculous. For any grad students planning to read this work (which despite this criticism I would highly recommend) don't feel guilty about only reading the intro and conclusions to the book and chapter intros and conclusions (you'll be able to spot the conclusions easily because every single one starts out with "Briefly") - there is absolutely nothing earth-shattering in the body of the text that he doesn't reiterate 4 times elsewhere (Intro, chapter intro, in the text, chapter conclusion, book conclusion)

Likaka stated that his two main objectives for this work were methodological and epistemological/conceptual (pg. 157), and he certainly achieves them. His work is path breaking in his use of using the names that the Congolese attached to the foreign colonial officials as a for of resistance and expression. Keen to include all perspectives, he fleshes out how the colonials reacted to and utilized their native monikers. Certainly, Likaka has found a unique approach to combat the problem that all of us face who study people who did not leave written records - this body of information certainly proved to be a trove of fascinating insights and I give him props for ignoring his adviser's initial dismissal of the sources, I just wish he'd not have tried to make a monographic mountain out of a molehill of sources.

[Helen-a · Rating 5 out of 5]

I am taking a class from Professor Likaka this semester so I may be a little bit biased but I really enjoyed both of his books. His style of both writing and teaching is of a different time, where it is easy to get lost in his words and stories while simultaneously learning interesting tidbits of information. I also like that he does not come from a European standpoint, but from an African one.