I received this e-book for free as a Readwise user, and quite enjoyed it. As a trained scholar and professional creator, I consider myself an advanced user when it comes to reading, taking notes, and writing. I came to the book from a perspective of curiosity, wondering whether it would share some new perspective and tactics to work with my notes, and/or whether I would recommend it to my coaching clients (emerging scholars and creators) as a resource. I enjoyed the writing of the first few pages, and just kept going until I was done.
Things I particularly appreciated about the book:
- Like all the cool kids, I read Sonke Ahrens' "How to Take Smart Notes," but I think Bob Doto's "A System for Writing" book is better. For one thing, it's a faster read, and very accessible to anyone. Doto also seems less preoccupied with following Luhmann's zettelkasten approach closely, taking some liberties in taxonomy and process.
- Doto makes particularly useful suggestions about the types of notes to use, including fleeting, reference, main, hub, structure, and keyword notes.
- Bottom-up and top-down writing both have their place, and most of what we create will be the result of a dance between those two approaches.
- There is strong emphasis on a point that I feel is neglected by many other "influencers" in the note-taking space: the notes have to serve the writing process, not the other way around, and at some point the writing has to be decoupled from the notes and take a life of its own.
- The author makes it clear that reading (learning), thinking, and writing are the three sides of a single triangle, and that intellectual pursuits are collective endeavors.
What I didn't care for much:
- I appreciate that the author is providing platform-agnostic suggestions that are useful for people who want to create a paper-based note system, but at this time it seems quaint and disconnected from the needs of most professional/aspiring scholars and writers (whether the latter recognize it or not, and for better or for worse). Though in an ideal world it would be great to take advantage of the friction created by physical note systems, the reality is that we are deluged with large amounts of information *and* actually expected to make sense of it and report on their findings in short amounts of time, while methodically tracking inputs and outputs. Entertaining paper-based solutions seems like bad advice. The space could have been used to discuss how to choose a suitable computer-based tool instead.
- I only skimmed through the chapter on creating an alphanumerical note-numbering system. Along the lines of the comment above, it seemed more like a nod to the traditional Luhmann slipbox.
- The final chapter on managing writing projects had some important suggestions (keeping a daily journal and creative log) that I feel should have appeared sooner, and I think it would help to talk about how those two devices can be integrated in the note system itself (not just live next to it).
I will be recommending the book to my clients who are serious about leveraging what they learn and the thoughts they have in order to create original content for others.