This book was a good start, but overall, I expected more from it than it delivered.
The authors start by defining AI (“systems that display intelligent behaviour by analysing their environment and taking actions—with some degree of autonomy—to achieve specific goals”), differentiating between various kinds of AI. They also explain how it works and how AI’s algorithms are vastly different from human functioning. Then they look at various ways AI is used today and how effective those uses are.
In chapter 3, they turn to the image of God in order to dive deeper into how AI’s “intelligence” is different from the image of God in humans and to lay a foundation for how AI might help or hinder human flourishing. The main way they see AI being a problem is if we cede authority and agency God has given us to machines.
A good summary quote: “When used improperly, AI impinges on the dignity and identity conferred upon God’s image bearers, which include the unique endowments of reason, relationship, and role. To put it succinctly, AI has the potential to make humans less human.” But they also argue that AI has the potential to help humans flourish and “partake in God’s quest to restore all things.”
Chapter 4 looks at technology more generally and how tools change the “ecosystem” and not just speed things up, but also how AI is different than most of the other technologies we’ve had before. Chapter 5 addresses issues of truth, flourishing, accelerated human life, and family in light of AI. Chapter 6 provides good, grounding habits for real human connection and a slower pace of life that pushes back on the dangers of AI and our technological age. Almost all of these aren’t Christian specific.
To this point, the book was really good, though I had a few quibbles here and there (like my model of imago Dei is a bit different, but doesn’t really change their main argument). Where I disagree with the authors is in some of the conclusions they draw in the final chapters.
Here they talk more specifically about potential pastoral uses of AI, such as writing sermons, songs, or aiding in counseling. They note that AI doesn’t have emotional intelligence, intuition, wisdom, or lived experience, so that means it can’t replace human counseling, and that since it can’t worship, it can’t write whole worship songs. They briefly touch on VR but in a way that seems to miss that Sunday isn’t just about worship but about doing so with God’s people.
Then they go into areas requiring caution, like editing and research, saying beware of the temptation to over-rely on it, but still seemingly approving the idea of AI as a collaborator (earlier terms used were “co-creator” and “partner”). Other cautious uses were for creating things like job postings and volunteer descriptions.
Finally, the areas they say consider going ahead with AI use: marketing, images, content generating in other areas, as well as SEO, website management, human capital management, and Bible translation. They conclude that “when struggling with inertia or complacency, we can use computers to inject some innovation.”
Wrapping up the book, the authors summarize with this statement: “If this book is about anything, it is not about understanding ourselves as techno-humans, fused with the algorithms of machine learning; rather, it is about the need to understand technology as our ancestors understood their ploughs, looms, shovels, and pickaxes— as tools used to complete a job, not to take over our lives so that we become products divorced from family, friends, emotions, and our living history.”
The good:
- I wish I’d had this book to reference while writing my paper on GenAI and J.R.R. Tolkien. The initial chapters are thoughtful and helpful and lay good groundwork often lacking in Christian discussions of AI.
- Their discussion of AI, conspiracy theories, and Gnosticism is thought-provoking.
- I like their framework for considering valid AI uses, the question of whether it will help or hinder human flourishing. But, I disagree with some of their conclusions as to what would help or hinder.
Critique:
- Despite defining various forms of AI early on, when discussing actual uses for it, they don’t differentiate between GenAI and other forms, which muddies the waters, especially when talking about legitimate uses for AI.
- The bulk of the book focused on their foundations of what AI is, what humans are, etc., which was good, but it dragged, and then the application sections didn’t fully recognize the implications of some of the issues brought up earlier. The first half of the book felt fairly cautious towards AI, but then in the last two chapters, it seemed that they contradicted themselves on a few points:
o Earlier they noted how AI doesn’t have emotional intelligence, but recommended it for composing more emotionally intelligent emails.
o They bring up cautions about losing our agency and authority, and giving up some of our humanity with use of AI, and then note that if we’re struggling with inertia or complacency, AI can help with innovation. Maybe they mean something different by complacency, but in my mind, the solution to complacency is to learn to work hard, not to outsource the task to a machine. This is especially the case with writer’s block; the work it takes to push through is a productive struggle that betters you as a writer.
o They rightly note that AI shouldn’t be used to write sermons or worship songs because it can’t worship and doesn’t have the Spirit… but then approve AI usage for Bible translation, which seems inconsistent to me.
Overall, there is a lot good in this book, but I think the authors fail to fully reckon with what human speech is and the degree to which regular usage of GenAI will lead to the deterioration of communication (I highly, highly recommend everyone read Jeffrey Bilbro’s article in Plough Magazine, “What Problem Does ChatGPT Solve?”).
(I received an ARC of this book to review from NetGalley)