In Facilitating Breakthrough, Kahane describes the process of transformative facilitation - "a structured and creative way to help diverse groups remove obstacles, bridge differences, and move forward together…enab[ling] breakthrough". In essence, Kahane explains, transfomative facilitation requires three elements - contribution (empowering participants to enable their contributions); connection (through creating inclusion and belonging); and equity (by creating an egalitarian and respectful culture within the group).
Kahane notes that in many organisations, "the default way of addressing…challenges [that arise in achieving a particular mission] is through forcing: the bosses decide what needs to happen and make that happen, whether or not their subordinates agree. Often people choose adapting: going along with things they don't agree with because they don't think they can change these things. Other times, people choose exiting: quitting their jobs because they don't like what's happening, don't think they can change it, and aren't willing to live with it. But….people often also choose the multilateral option: collaborating within and across organisational teams and departments to get things done cooperatively and creatively. Facilitation is necessary when people want to collaborate to create change."
Transformative facilitation entails shifting between vertical and horizontal approaches to facilitation, depending on where the group is at, whether the group is stuck in rigidity and domination or in fragmentation and gridlock. Where the vertical is top down, hierarchical, emphasising coordination and cohesion, the latter is bottom up - participants' different understanding of the problem, their separate decisions on how to proceed - and focusses on individual autonomy and equality. Vertical facilitation is what most organisations employ because "verticality is the dominant organising principle of most organisations; vertical facilitation is also comforting for facilitators since it gives them more control and predictability over the process.
Kahane explains that in transformative facilitation, the facilitator makes both vertical and horizontal moves to remove structural obstacles to contribution, connection and equity. All collaborations must address five questions; transformative facilitation answers these questions by shifting between vertical and horizontal approaches:
- How do we see our situation: the facilitator helps participants cycle between advocating and inquiring. To do so, the facilitator must pay attention to what is happening and what is needed in the situation and in the group
- How do we define success: the facilitator helps participants cycle between concluding and advancing. To do so, the facilitator needs to discern - to pay attention to when the group needs to slow down to agree, when to keep moving forward without or with only partial agreement, and when to stop and end. Here, Kahane notes that collaborations often require nonagreement as well as agreement - you can collaborate with those that you do not agree with; it is about finding ways to move forward while staying in relationship.
- How will get from here to there: the facilitator helps participants cycle between mapping and discovering. The facilitator needs to adapt - to pay attention to when to persist in following a planned route and when to pivot to try a new one. Given that collaborations might sometimes require people to team with those they don't agree with, like or trust, collaborating "does not involve a single choice - whether to join a team - but a series of them"
- How do we decide who does what: the facilitator helps participants cycle between directing and accompanying by serving the participants, paying attention to when they need firm instruction and when they need relaxed support
- How do we understand our role: the facilitator helps participants cycle between standing outside the problematic situation and standing inside it; the facilitator needs to partner by paying attention to when to focus on being apart from the group and situation and when to focus on being part of it.
Kahane's book is illuminating on many fronts. It points out patterns and dynamics that are instantly recognisable to people working in organisations and other systems. Like:
"Many people…assume that someone is or should be in control and able to provide everyone else simplicity, stability and security. When things don't go as these people think they should, they lament, "Why don't they" - the government, the bosses, the leaders - "just…". The model of command-and-control, directive, vertical leadership is familiar and straightforward, so it's a popular default. People may wish that it could work, but it many situations it can't, for two interrelated reasons. First, people face situations characterised by irreducible volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity - and thus out of their control. Second, in many societies and organisations, people are less bound by hierarchies and less deferential, so they're harder to control…Directing by itself has limitations…[you] need other to connect to the understanding and will that inspires them to act of their own volition."
And the concept of transformative facilitation and how it entails adapting to the changing context and cycling different poles makes a lot of sense. The struggle is translating this to practice - what does it mean, what do you do, to shift from advocating and inquiring and vice versa, between concluding and advancing, mapping and discovering, directing and accompanying, standing outside and standing inside?
On a more minor note, Kahane's writing helped me better understand the rationale behind certain methods and techniques, e.g. having tables and chairs that are small and light to allow for new configurations that facilitate new conversations with new people, working materials such as shared flip charts, sticky notes and toy bricks so that all participants can easily see and use the materials together to regroup and revise their ideas "encourage flexibility within boundaries and enable participants to generate new ideas, relationships and actions"; paired walks to enable two participants to connect as fellow humans and reflect on the roles they are playing in their situation; Open Space Technology which enables contribution by empowering participants to work on issues that matter most to them