Why is embracing your Lutheran Identify important? After reading a book promising to answer this question, I expected to understand the reasoning behind its conclusion—even if I might not agree with it.
While the book discusses the Lutheran group identity, it fails to address its actual title, ‘Embracing Your Lutheran Identity.’ Instead of exploring the concept of ‘embracing,’ Veith focuses on presenting historical facts interspersed with his opinions on other denominations.
Strengths of the Book
1. It provides interesting insights into church history as a whole.
2. It offers some engaging details about Lutheran history, though none are particularly transformative.
General Weaknesses
1. A lack of sources to support the details provided.
2. Weak editorial work, including frequent incorrect phrasing and sentences that often start with "But" or "And."
3. The absence of explanations for why the points being made are significant.
4. The use of the fallacy of alleged certainty in conclusions, along with numerous assumptions embedded in the questions posed.
Weakness 1
From an academic standpoint, I expected a more rigorous approach. Despite Veith's background as a professor, the book includes many interesting or highly specific facts and statistics that lack proper citations. In an academic setting, such omissions would likely result in a lower grade. While some items were cited, the majority—particularly those towards the end of the book, such as percentages of different denominational groups—were not.
Weakness 2
There was an abundance of sentences starting with "but" or "and." Mid-sentence thoughts were frequently broken into smaller fragments, disrupting the flow and making the author's ideas difficult to follow. Conversely, other sentences were overly long and convoluted, making their purpose or objective unclear.
Weakness 3
As noted in the opening paragraph, the book fails to explain why its points are significant. It does not create any sense of urgency for the reader to take its arguments to heart. Even when the concluding statements in a section are accurate, their importance is not addressed. Since the book focuses on identity, providing a compelling "why" is essential.
Weakness 4
There is a lack of argument or reasoning behind the conclusions drawn. For example, when discussing problematic church behaviors, Veith states, “Some is more problematic, such as preaching sermons that give 'biblical tips for successful living,' as opposed to preaching the Law and Gospel” (pg. 294). Veith does not explain why this is problematic; he simply presents it as a fact. While Lutheran theology may view preaching "biblical tips for successful living" as an issue, asserting it without further explanation does not make it inherently true. This is an example of the fallacy of alleged certainty, or assuming the conclusion.
Each section includes questions intended to help readers engage more deeply with the material. However, two issues arise. First, many of the questions contain underlying assumptions. For instance, question four on page 256 assumes, “they conserve very little...” and then asks, “What’s the problem with that?” As a reader, I am essentially forced to agree with the assumption, even if I believe the opposite. This is just one example of many questions that carry such assumptions. As a result, I often left these questions unanswered.
Secondly, many of the questions seemed disconnected from the content of the section. They felt more like an afterthought rather than a tool to deepen understanding of the chapter. This reminded me of college homework assignments that were unrelated to the main material.
However, the author states in the introduction that the questions aren't meant to have right or wrong answers and are not a test to determine whether you've read the material. Despite this, many of the questions carry assumptions that give the impression there is a correct answer. Even though the author encourages discussing answers with those who have different perspectives, it becomes difficult to engage with the questions when the assumptions themselves are problematic.
Personal Reflection
On a more personal note, I found the author’s tone towards other Christian denominations to be offensive, especially towards the end of the book. I found the book more draining than encouraging when it came to exploring what it means to “embrace my Lutheran identity.” More importantly, I don't feel that it addresses the significance of a Christian identity as a whole. Whether intentional or not, the author conveyed the idea that a Lutheran identity supersedes the identity that Christ has given us, without explaining why I should embrace it.
Conclusion
This book ultimately fails to fulfill its promise by neglecting to explain the importance of embracing a Lutheran identity. Instead, it focuses on historical facts, editorial inconsistencies, and unsupported arguments, leaving readers with more questions than answers. While it offers occasional insights into church history, it does not provide a compelling reason to embrace Lutheran identity—or even clarify what that identity entails. A more fitting title, such as A Historical Overview of Lutheran Identity , would better reflect the book's content, as it neither addresses the significance of embracing this identity nor offers convincing reasons to do so.