Where do find our meaning in what we do? I think this question is a burning thought in many minds today as we seek God’s will in the world. We look towards the past for expressions of practice that have been impactful in society and in religion proper and we seek humble reflections from ages past to see what God was doing in certain places among certain moments of cultural expression. This informs our future understanding of the Church and how we participate in a common life together. It is easy to build an inarticulate argument for what we are doing but it is a greater task to really dig deep into our work together as the body of Christ and find meaning among that calling. Our practices shape how the world around us sees our gatherings and ethics and reflection and care must be a part of the conversation within our ecclesial (unaffiliated and affiliated) circles. Bass, Volf, and others have given us a theological basis for understanding these questions and realities. While the overall ethos of the text is widespread among the voices in various chapters, Kathryn Tanner points us to the idea that we must understand our Christian practices as meaningful expressions of faith so that our actions have an innate meaning that practices of wider society lack.
In the Introduction, Dorothy Bass outlines the theological basis for Christian practices and calls Christian community into ongoing theological work of discernment. At its root, practice should align with our “thinking about God” and we should reflect on “ordinary, concrete activities of actual people”. It is interesting to note that Bass recalls the authors of this text deciding to focus a meeting time together on one practice and through that conversation practices were enacted as a result. These practices are examples of “Christian life as lived” and further develop the idea of ‘communal belonging’ which defines our relationships with one another.
One of the highlights of the text is Christine Pohl’s conversation on hospitality as a communal aspect. She begins the chapter with an experience she had at the Open Door Community in Atlanta, GA (which is now located in Baltimore, MD). Hospitality is the foundation for their “work of mercy and advocacy for the oppressed”. Also, Pohl discovered that through the various practices of “welcome” the community does for the poor, hungry, homeless, suffering, the “witness of Jesus and the Scriptures...is the centrality of hospitality.” Practicing welcome is a hard business to be in and often times we rely on the work of others to share hospitality as a communal work. Also, this work, in a contextual sense, can only be done with the people and resources that are present. And when communities do practices well, others become engaged because “they sense that there is something true or authentic within these communities”.
In continuing the idea presented earlier, Kathryn Tanner calls for us to find meaning in the practices we are doing as the Church through theological reflection. She points out that “Theologians construct systems of ideas and draw systematic connections between Christian actions and belief.” The Church at its core finds belonging and meaning from the things we do and the things we say. Interestingly enough, these systems are most faithful to the Gospel when they are organically derived versus being mechanically produced. This is why the megachurch model has suffered in the last decade. Through large investments and endowments, people have built systems that feed into our desires of consumption and attraction with little regard to the Holy Spirit’s work in personal relationships. But when people find belonging in a small community group and are able to share their experience of faith with others then people flourish. Returning to Tanner’s point, these systems, whether implicit or explicit, must have a time of reflection that builds off of the positive outcomes and exposes the negative. This reflection should be done in connection with leaders and laity and be discerning of God’s work and ask questions about whether our actions are in-line with our beliefs.
The last chapter in the text was done by Miroslav Volf and he addresses the real connection of practices and theology. Volf states that “at the heart of every good theology… is a compelling account of a way of life.” He explains his understanding of beliefs and practices and draws a distinction between a practice of Christian life and an enacted belief like that of the sacraments. When addressing the Lord’s Supper, Volf says that the practice of welcoming others to our communion tables(ecclesial) is a glimpse at the eschatological table that our Triune God will host. In doing so, we practice hospitality and welcome in our Christian lives and we believe that this is a foretaste of God’s holy banquet. He also states that practices come before beliefs but they both must inform one another as we discern our life together. I understand this in a simple way: we were most likely introduced to the Gospel by another’s practice and not their belief. This, then, should draw our attention to the fact that our actions in the world speak louder than our belief.
Overall, this text is a wonderful exploration of how faith informs our beliefs and our practices in the world. We get a taste of what our purpose is in connecting our practices with our faith while we dig into the meaning of our faith. Wherever we find a sense of belonging, our practices and our beliefs shape how the world see us as faithful people and through reflection and care for the other we will continue to participate in a shared life together.