A couple of months ago when I was practicing essays for my upcoming GAMSAT, my tutor said something that stuck with me as I entered my section 2 exam room. “Stop giving me too many examples, you’re just wasting your time”. I think it’s natural for us to prove what we are saying empirically rather than rationally. The scientific method is deeply embedded in our psyches throughout early education and it has probably become the largest lens through which we engage with epistemology. Gravity is real because the apples falls at 9.81 m/s^2. The proof is in the pudding. The problem with GAMSAT essays is that assessors aren’t looking for you to prove what is real and what isn’t. They’re looking to assess your character, they are looking to find out who you are to see if you are suitable candidate for medicine. As such, your GAMSAT essays must be jam packed with words that speak to your qualities and personality. Let’s take a classic PEEL-style paragraph. The bulk of your score will be assessed through the “Explanation” portion of the paragraph, as this is where your analysis and your voice can truly shine. This was something I had to work on. Before, I spent too much time making sure I had explained the example perfectly, trying to guide the reader to see exactly why my example was the “proof in the pudding”. In reality though, the purpose of an example is simply to attach something concrete to the abstract ideas you put forth in your “point” (or topic sentence). Its only use case is to prove that you aren’t talking out your ass and making things up. Once this has been accomplished, recurrent examples or explaining the example in more depth robs yourself the opportunity to engage in insightful discussion on the topic where you can really show your character.
I bring this up because this, I think, is my biggest gripe with this book. In the introduction we were posed a question: “The question is, to be a champion, do you need the kind of personality that leads you towards sin?” There are so many avenues and directions to take with this question. Some are explored in the book, but not enough to satisfy my curiosity. Instead, this book is broken down into seven chapters, one for each sin. In each chapter there are 5-6 examples of the worst sinners in each category followed by a brief paragraph of analysis about what made each champion such a big sinner. In all fairness, the examples provided in this book are told with impressive story-telling, and it is hard to believe that these are real world events that have happened. I flinched, cringed and face-palmed time and time again. I seriously cannot believe how much Russell Stephen King “achieved” purely by manipulating the greed of others. While I wouldn’t call this book particularly insightful, it definitely is entertaining and fun to read.
The most analysis we get from the book comes from the conclusion which raises a few points about athletes and sinning. It postulates that athletes face a level of scrutiny and pressure that push them utilise sins as a coping mechanism. While people like you and me “sin” moderately, the pressure cooker of being a celebrity and being judged your talents encourage them to sin more severely to cope. This, I think is a failing on society. The godlike and hero-worship status we attach to sport stars means that they have an implicitly signed a social contract to always act in accordance with a code of conduct that is deemed acceptable to our standards (one that does not always stay consistent). This feels unjust to me. Especially if you are a younger up-and-comping athlete. Where is the opportunity to partake in some tomfoolery and shenanigans? I’m certainly not excusing or justifying terrible behaviour, but a healthy upbringing (and by extension a healthy life) must allow for some room for fun and play. Without, someone may feel like they have lost their opportunity to simple have fun. Perhaps this loss of joyous youth, spending too much time training and studying the game rather enjoying life and making valuable connections, drives athletes to chase the youthful feeling of joy and happiness in sins.
Athletes are human after all, not gods despite how we treat them. Perhaps this says something about secular society and how in the absence of God, we try to uplift each other to fill that void. Athletes are the easiest thing we can comprehend as being “super-human” (even if they are, just human). They are so much stronger, taller, faster and fitter than the average person, hence it makes lot of intuitive sense as to why we deify these individuals. We rarely do this to the opposite type of individual, someone who extremely impressive academically or “smart” will rarely get the same attention and fame (barring outlier examples like Albert Einstein), even if the feats that these people create are just as ridiculous and amazing. I wonder what would happen if we did glorify these individuals more routinely, Would sin still be so rife in the public domain as it is currently with athletes? Or would the world be a little cleaner?
I think it’s also important to acknowledge the capitalistic aspect of this discussion (which isn’t really done in the book). Part of why we deify athletes is because they are physical specimens. Yet another and very large part why we deify athletes is because they have MONEY. Elite athletes in lucrative sports are never really just athletes are they? They stack paper to the ceiling and live a certain lifestyle that many of us dream of as we clock in our 9-5 jobs. We see the life of athletes and project onto them our own desires for liberation. With this much money, the temptation to sin must beckon you harder and harder and it’s understandable why so many athletes fall for this. More money, more problems right? Especially of you are a child do not have the cognitive capacity to navigate the life of fame. This raises an important question, are we paying our elite athletes too much money? It seems hardly fair to me that an NBA player gets paid millions while the ICU nurse which saves lives daily gets paid in tens of thousands. Yes, athletes bring entertainment value and in the free market as they are a high value commodity which produce an insane amount of return financially. But is that all we care about? Should people be remediated based off their potential to yield high returns in the free market? That seems unjust to me. To me, part of the picture of athletes sinning is simply down to the reality of capitalism.
There are so many more facets to this conversation which I simply am not bothered to go into. I just wish the book did!