I read frequently. I have a read many bad books. If I have ever finished a book that I detested more than "Straight to Hell," the experience has (thankfully) been suppressed. Why did I read the entire book? The genre of high-finance misdeeds is of interest, and I have read most of the key works--both the comparatively high-minded ("Barbarians at the Gate," "Den of Thieves," "The Smartest Guys in the Room," "Liar's Poker" etc.) and the relatively less so (e.g. "The Wolf of Wall Street"). I breezed through "Straight to Hell" in one sitting, as there really isn't much to it. The whole thing could have easily been pared down to a magazine article. The impetus to finish stemmed from some nagging curiousness about whether the would get any better. Spoiler alert: it doesn't. The only remarkable thing about "Straight to Hell" is that it manages to simultaneously be both so revolting and so...boring.
The tedium starts straightaway, with LeFevre lovingly detailing his spirited misbehavior at Choate (he covertly kept a mini-fridge in his dorm-room!). There is a lot of reminiscing about people getting locked out of rooms naked. Actually, that sort of thing makes up the bulk of the whole book. The question of why any person of reasonable intelligence would possibly find this stuff interesting hangs like a thick blanket of smog over the entire desultory proceedings.
As befits a finance expert, LeFevre loves numbers. His entire account is padded with them, although not in a way that is at all meaningful. Every lovingly-recounted episode of debauchery (i.e. every single chapter) is rife with quotidian statistics, primarily about how many bottles of wine were drunk, how many lines of cocaine snorted, and how long particular international flights last, along with an excruciating amount of detail about what specific times LeFevre went to bed and then got up to go to work. I had to go back and verify that Atlantic Monthly Press actually published this dreck. Sadly--they did.
LeFevre manages to convey all the sordid details in an unwavering tone of smug self-satisfaction. It is really quite impressive that he was able to crank-out this whole pointless tome while avoiding any hint of reflection, insight or perspective. The entire financial crisis flies past in a few paragraphs. It is apparently self-evident to LeFevre that the crisis was caused not by people like himself but by...Barney Frank. The only reason the recession seems to register with LeFevre at all is that it results in a decreased workload for him and his girlfriend. As a result, they start to spend more time together and realize that they do not even like each other. This is all dispensed with rather quickly, however, so that the counting of bottles and lines can resume.
Ultimately, the conflict that "Straight to Hell" inspires between indifference and disgust is definitively resolved with "loathsome" carrying the day. The final chapter is a set piece in which LeFevre engages in a sex tourism jaunt in the Philippines with a large cohort of investment banking colleagues, co-workers and clients. LeFevre recalls with evident fondness how much fun he had degrading sex workers, who he incessantly refers to as "Love Monkeys." The entire repellant stew of misanthropy, misogyny and unalloyed racism is whipped into a froth. If you are unfamiliar with the mechanics of "Monkey Love Bowling," LeFevre cheerfully explains how the pros do it: grease up the bar so that naked women can be "bowled" into a set-up of empty bottles. Thus concludes a volume that began with the author unaccountably dedicating his literary endeavor to...his wife and children. Thanks dad.
Despite the dismal paucity of writing talent on display, at least LeFevre knows not to bury the lead. From the prologue: "My objective is to unapologetically showcase the true soul of Wall St...No epiphanies. No apologies. No f**ks given."
As regards LeFevre-- read "Straight to Hell"...and you won't give a f**k about him either.