A call for Evangelical Christians to reconsider the traditions and cultural baggage of some of their heritage, becoming "revangelical," people who have stopped to be again "gospeled" by the NT.
The author uses his own story as a catalyst for the book: raised in an Evangelical church, strayed, came back, entered ministry, did his thing, but started to recognize how judgmental and non-loving and not like Jesus he was. Such defines the posture of the book: Evangelicals are now the butt of jokes because they seem like clueless cultural fossils and don't look much like Jesus. Hence the need for "revangelicals."
The chapters are conveniently alliterative: recalibrate, repent, recommit, reconcile, represent, renew, restore, reunite, reposition. As mentioned he describes his own story and how he needed to change the way he looked at the Gospel, himself, and especially those with whom he disagreed. He encourages Evangelicals to shift perspective and stop assuming they are the majority/the majority will agree with them. He encourages Evangelicals to have friends and relationships outside of Evangelical circles. They should reflect Jesus in their life. Then he gets into critiques of many of the "conservative" Evangelical positions from a more "progressive" bent: challenging capitalism's excess and thus a wholesale embrace of it, rebuking denigration and stereotyping of the poor and the denial of inequality in society, and a call for examination of the heart in terms of acceptance of and even advancement of war, violence, etc. in contrast to the more pacifistic position of Christ.
The reviewer would not call himself Evangelical since he has many critiques of many of the "planks" of Evangelical theology but would likely be lumped into the "Evangelical" category by most in society. The reviewer also has seen many such tendencies among his own people; he tends to agree with the author but is not the best at putting many of the principles into practice.
As the substance goes the work is good and has things worth considering. The idea of being "revangelical" is fully explained and makes sense in that context but in general seems like a declaration of victory in the midst of defeat, as if one has to move past being "evangelical" to take the Gospel seriously (which the reviewer agrees with but for entirely different reasons). What does it say about modern American Evangelicalism if a good chunk of its constituency needs to actually hear the Gospel message for what it is?
You'll either love this book or hate it; where one falls on partisan and sectarian divides will decide which it will be. It's a good reminder of why it's important to be "gospeled" by the true unvarnished Gospel of Christ in the first place, and why Christians do well to be vigilant against compromising the Gospel to advance socio-political or economic agendas or philosophies, even those that seem somewhat aligned with God's purposes (Colossians 2:1-10).
**--book received as part of early review program