I enjoyed learning about the issues impacting California from the ostensibly conservative perspective during the first half of the book, however, the latter half of the book suggests that Steve Hilton is out of touch with the current trajectory of the Right (especially Gen Z). His persistent "El Futuro Es Latino" mantra is reminiscent of Jeb Bush's egregious 2016 presidential campaign (e.g., the slogan "!Jeb!"). That rhetoric didn't work in 2016, and it won't work in 2026.
Additionally, Steve Hilton calls Daniel Lurie a friend
(p. 185) and a political outsider, but Mayor Lurie just signed the black reparations fund that Hilton rebukes on p. 106, p. 124-129. Very ironic (and I don't think someone with degrees from Duke University and University of California, Berkeley can be a political outsider).
Lastly, Steve Hilton is opposed to what the people of California voted for in 1994 California Proposition 187 (and 2008 California Proposition 8), yet claims to be opposed to current aims by the Democratic Party to provide illegals with free healthcare, mortgages, interest-free loans for businesses, etc. Are these things that he is evidently opposed to really that big of a jump from free public education, non-emergency health care, etc.? Steve Hilton also uses the Columbia Journalism Review and AP News standard for capitalizing "Black", but not
"white." He also calls illegal immigrants
"undocumented” per the euphemistic treadmill.
Per Fool’s Gold by Crabtree and McFatter, “Ronald Reagan signed an immigration reform bill in 1986 that provided amnesty to 3 million illegal immigrants, for paving the way for more amnesty bills, and making California, along with the rest of the country, a magnet for illegal immigration.” (p.85). One suspects Hilton is a Reaganite in this respect.