To someone who is not a baseball fan, I am guessing the premise of this book may sound more boring than anything they could possibly imagine. A detailed inning-by-inning, batter-by-batter, pitch-by-pitch account of a random insignificant baseball game in the middle of June, 1982. Even when this book was published, in 1985, much closer to the game in question, it had to have had a similar effect among non-fans. But for me, a lifelong baseball fan, I was instantly intrigued when I read about this book, and also read the praise it received, with more than a few noted baseball writers and analysts lauding it as their favorite baseball book of all time.
The biggest reason that people give for not liking baseball is that "it's boring". Fair enough--different people are excited or bored by different things, and you're rarely going to convince someone otherwise. I find soccer to be incredibly boring, but billions of people all over the world beg to differ. Nonetheless, when people are willing to engage, I love to talk about all the strategy that goes into every single "boring" play within a baseball game--into every pitch in fact. When I came across "9 Innings", written by the founder of Rotisserie League baseball, no less, I was excited to see how Dan Okrent had been able to write 250+ pages about a single baseball game. The answer is...he didn't...not really.
Stepping back, I should have mentioned that this random game, on June 10, 1982, was between the Milwaukee Brewers and the Baltimore Orioles, my favorite team. Although it was written more from the Brewers' side of the field (I'm not sure if Okrent is a Brewers fan, but they were the team that was more heavily researched, and to which he had the greatest access leading up to the game in question), there was still quite a bit of detail about the Orioles. Also, much of the Brewers' front office at the time was comprised of former Orioles brass. So, in addition to just being curious as to how this book would go in general, I was interested even more due to the fact that the O's were involved. I was born later that year and didn't really start to follow the team until 1989 or so, but I certainly recognized all of the players' names, especially Cal Ripken, Jr., who I do fondly remember watching play up until his retirement in 2001.
But here's the problem I had with this book, and the reason I only gave it 3 stars: the majority of the pages are filled with background on specific players/coaches/executives (mainly on the Brewers' side) having little or nothing to do with the game in question. I understand the bigger point that Okrent is trying to make here. Player X wouldn't be playing in this very game if this sequence of events in his life hadn't culminated in his being acquired by the Brewers. Or maybe Player Y wouldn't have been playing at all today, if Player Z hadn't gotten injured. Etc., etc. But one can go down the butterfly effect rabbit hole with darn near anything that happens in life. The same would have been true if he were detailing the game on June 9, or June 11. Furthermore, although some of the chapter lead-ins tied seamlessly into the action that was about to ensue on the field in that particular inning, oftentimes it didn't. The chapter intros were often meandering, with illogical transitions. I am completely making up this example and being somewhat hyperbolic, but it kind of went something like this:
"Catcher Ted Simmons was acquired from the Cardinals in the offseason. Used to being a full-time catcher, Simmons had accepted his new role with the Brewers, willing to do anything to help the team...while Simmons sat on the bench and scratched his butt, the Brewers took the field in the top of the 5th". And then the action of that inning would have nothing to do with Simmons or even the Brewers' current catcher.
It was still interesting at times, but not exactly what I thought I was going to be getting. To his credit, Okrent did do a good and thorough job of describing the action within the game. Every out and nearly every pitch was detailed. He also did a good job of detailing the different pieces of strategy that go into the game, whether it be whether or not to hit-and-run, whether to pinch hit, or whether to throw a fastball or curve in a specific count. In general, the strategies of that time were quite different than they are today, in this age of analytics. Earl Weaver, Orioles manager, was somewhat of a pioneer in his disdain for bunting and stealing bases, but these were strategies that were heavily used back in the early-80s.
I did find myself reading the book like a suspense novel of sorts, not wanting to look up any spoilers about what would happen (who would win the game). I was rooting for the 1982 Orioles in my mind, since rooting for them in 2021 is usually a thankless effort. But, alas (spoiler alert!), the O's fell 9-7.
On the whole, this was a good book for fans of baseball and baseball literature. It just fell a little short of what I was expecting.