Another book chosen from the many free ones available for the Kindle.
I'm not sure what I was expecting when I picked this one up. In spite of the way it's tagged or shelved by some others, I would not classify it as either "feminist" or "erotica." If you're looking for a steamy read, this is not going to satisfy.
Protagonist Carlotta Peel is not a typical woman. Bennett wrote this around the turn of the 20th century, decades before the you-go-girl era of feminism, so it's unfair to judge it completely by today's standards. Carlotta flouts conventions almost unapologetically, living on her own as an author at an age and during an era when women still needed a chaperon to maintain propriety. She endeavors forward with little hesitation and is usually ready to be straightforward with consequences. Though there is some dialogue, most of the story is constructed of her (sometimes very pathetic) introspection.
Yet, Carlotta appears to believe her ultimate satisfaction is in feeling that she's sublimated her ambition and desires to those of her lovers, to men. "For you I will be nothing but a woman," she says. And later, "Wondrous, the joy I found in playing the decorative, acquiescent, self-effacing woman to him, the pretty, pouting plaything!" she narrates. It is questionable, though, if being the plaything is really her ultimate accomplishment. Wealth, personal success, fame, love, the ability to do as one pleases, interesting experiences, artistic accomplishment, altruistic acts, self pride/confidence -- all worthy goals, but does she fail in any of them or really find a greater gratification in any one of these over the others?
I am interested that this doesn't appear to be a cautionary tale and that there is much less of a didactic undertone than I expected. Carlotta's self-second-guessing, hesitation, and regrets are things anyone experiences even today. I looked for some literary criticism regarding the piece online, but there isn't much. Somewhere in my searching, I read that the author was prolific and was most concerned about making a profit, so I'd lean toward the idea that this is meant to be an entertaining tale versus something with an underlying moral motive.
The prose is . . . not exactly flowery, maybe "wordy" is a better term, and often (as I said before) pathetic. It's a story about a European woman written by a man. It's a first person view. I found myself putting it down quite often or reading something else in the meantime, but I was curious about where Bennett was going to take the thing. I'm glad it was free.