I read Liana Finck's Passing for Human and am familiar with her work in The New Yorker, so picked this up the other day, in part because my eyes focused on the attractive cover. This book is a more than 300-page adaptation of the Book of Genesis with God as a woman (which is of course not an original idea, but it's well done here, both humorous and insightful). Finck is respectful of the "original" that she read as the first book of the Torah, so her version is both whimsical and thought-provoking on this book's tales of Earth's and humankind's beginnings, our difference from other animals, and all the familiar stories in it.
It's a longish book, and way complicated, just as any translation of Genesis must be. I own Robert Crumb's The Book of Genesis, which includes every single word from the King James version of the Bible. Fundamentalists say every single word is literally true, and better to read than any other books on the planet, and it is a good collection of sometimes didactic, sometimes bizarre, but nevertheless interesting and instructive tales. Crumb was in part responding to the humorous assertion from some Christians who want to censor all sorts of books for excessive sex and violence and crazy flights of fancy. Read the Holy Bible! That's the one! Sure, read Genesis to your children, go ahead, and see if you can take this pastiche from different texts that is Genesis and make it into a sweet and straightforward tale. Whoa! Talk about sex and violence!
However, Finck does not get all graphic here about either the sex or the violence. She makes it clear that women are ignored or abused through the book, but seeing it all through the lens of God-as-Woman makes it for her more palatable and relatable. Finck says in her afterword that she hopes her book gives people the encouragement to develop for themselves a relatable version of God. Is this what when I grew up they called "relativism," as in make-the-Bible-say-whatever-it-is-you-want-it-to-say so you can justify your own behavior? No, Linck just thinks you can't believe in a God you can't relate to.
The "begats" are always a challenge in these early books. So much begatting! And the men seem to begat men, since there is no mention of women (so the illustration of men giving birth out of different parts of their bodies is amusing). So do you like reading about Noah and God's angry destruction of all the humans on the planet (except Noah and his wife) and most of the animals as punishment? Yeah, okay, you can have that story and make a picture book out of it (as people have!). But what about Noah's wife?! And the men in this book such as Noah who live to 950 years old?! Literally true? Old math vs new math? But hey, I want to find out the name of Noah's personal trainer!
In the end, Finck both 1) doesn't encourage you to take all of Genesis as literally true, though 2) it gives a fairly standard rendition of the core of the book, seen through a (softly, respectfully) feminist lens. The art is wonderfully light and colorful and engaging. One of the best comics works of the year.