With the same accessible style as The Price of Money and a talent for rendering quite complex economic concepts simple, this is a book worth reading. The light humour and reassuring tone leaves the reader with a sense of confidence that they can better navigate the usually troubled waters of their finances.
I would say, however, that the claim of the book to debunk conventional wisdom about financial choices is something of an exaggeration. Own your own home, balance stocks and bonds in a certain ratio, etc., are not so much as debunked as demonstrated to depend much on one’s own circumstances. And this is where the merit of the book lies, in providing a framework to evaluate one’s own position and act accordingly. Ultimately the choices are going to fall inside most of the conventional ones, just how and when one might make them is rightly going to vary.
I do, however, have a couple of gripes. The first comes to property. Buy to let comes up frequently without even a smidgeon of recognition of the societal impact of this. He recognises property prices have risen in line with or better than inflation, but that is because of decisions by individuals that favour a middle-aged middle class. Artificial scarcity in the housing sector has bad knock on effects – preventing people from getting on the property ladder – which as the author notes is one sure way to have protective assets, but also exacerbating the social and community instability that comes about when people are denied such a thing. Owning a house encourages our common inclinations to husbandry and belief and investment in a community. To simply abstract this concern (equally with investing in fossil fuels for exampke) from its wider societal consequences, might be good for individuals but will not help to create a more equal society. And a more equal, fairer, more compassionate society in the long run might be better for more people, as it might provide many of the benefits that are aspired to by the desire for financial freedom.
Relatedly, a strong message in the book is to earn more. The author encourages industry but does not encourage us to evaluate potential choices on an ethical plane. Again, society. Here a bit of Marxian economics would help. A social media influencer does not create new value. They do not add to the net worth of an economy. All they do is shift money into their own pockets that would otherwise go elsewhere. Obviously this book is for individuals seeking financial freedom so it comes down to personal choices but I do wonder if the people excited by dropshipping or affiliate marketing or shamelessly promoting brands, or bitcoin for that matter, ever really pause to evaluate their actions with regard to social responsibility. I was fascinated by bitcoin as a means of exchange, but as a carbon-hungry vehicle merely to augment personal wealth I find it rather abhorrent.
So the critique is this. Dix rightly encourages a holistic approach to finance. But the sense of the whole stops there. But what is personal finance other than security and well-being? And to fail to recognise that there are other sources of this, that are directly correlated, does those readers a disservice. Investing in an arms company that sells to Israel’s baby killing machine has the effect of reducing our net level of happiness on a daily basis. The author has an opportunity here to talk about finance in a wider sense, in how it impacts lives, and that question should definitely be part of the equation.