DNF
Unfortunately, I really struggled to get through this and ended up giving up on page 68 (out of 221 pages).
I know a little about English history and basically nothing of French.
So, I was hoping to build up my knowledge of French history with this book.
However, this is a very dry and very messy read.
It amounts to lists of names and dates, and a sentence or two of event context.
I saw others had said this too but was willing to give it a go, being happy for any introduction to French history.
But it was too hard to take much in with that format.
And to make it harder, there were references within these snippets of other historical moments "similar" to the one currently being spoken of.
Making the book feel less linear, and much more like it is jumping around.
I don't need to know that this event was the biggest version of it until a similar event two hundred years from it with X and Y regents.
Just tell me about that event when we get to it, otherwise it becomes too overloaded with information and makes it hard to actually keep track.
"Charlemagne (r.768 - 814 as king of the Franks), Pepin III's son, and a great military leader, proved far more successful than the Merovingians, rather as Napoleon for much of his reign was more successful than his predecessors, the Bourbons." page 30
Napoleon does not show up for a long time, we do not need to tie him in yet.
When throwing around lots of dates and people - Keep it simple. Keep it linear (as much as possible).
I did learn some key points, but I had to work hard to get very little back.
So, I ended up repeatedly thinking that I could just find a more user-friendly and efficient way to learn all this.
And so gave up on this one.
It is probably great as a reference tool, but it is not a good read.