What do you think?
Rate this book
Net Zero Will Destroy You and Everything You Care About
An accurate and terrifying account of the ways in which Net Zero will damage everything we hold dear - and why it is the gateway to the Great Reset.
138 pages, Kindle Edition
Published July 15, 2024
25 people are currently reading
3 people want to read
About the author
Jack King
49 books2 followersLibrarian Note: There is more than one author by this name in the Goodreads data base.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
December 3, 2025
Disappointing. Just a list of strongly asserted opinions.
The author makes it clear in the appendix that he is a medical doctor, writing under a pseudonym so that no one can target him to remove his medical licence. That is probably a prudent move, as the book attacks many aspects of modern medicine.
Vaccines are denied. So, also is the usefulness of peer review. In fact, in chapter 168 the author tells readers to ‘ignore anyone who says that peer reviews are useful…’ He insists that they are just ‘a bunch of dumb and corrupt scientists paid by drug companies… confirming that garbage produced by dumb and corrupt scientists… is essential.’ Wow. So essentially nothing can be evidenced or proven, as the principle mechanism for what counts as proof is now to be jettisoned. Sadly, there are no footnotes or references to justify such a starkly negative opinion in chapter 168. It is just asserted.
The books relationship with evidence and argument is problematic from its earliest pages. For example, we are told that the BBC is ‘the most sexist, ageist and racist media organisation… (which has) little interest in discussion, debate or… evidence or facts.’
Again, nothing is cited to justify that opinion. But more interestingly, why is the author accusing the BBC of sexism and ageism. Even if those allegations were true, they are entirely irrelevant to what the book is supposed to be about, which is Climate Change. All that such comments do, is attempt to “poison the source’ as a negative ad hominem argument. That of course is a fallacious way of arguing.
The book goes on to criticise in strident language, asserting that others are gullible, virtue signalling their commitment to nonsensical ideas. But again, there is next to no evidence or justification presented for any of those opinions. There is an occasional reference to Vernon Coleman’s books, but that is hardly an uncontroversial source.
Overall, there is little point in reading the book for information, as all that it gives is a set of assertions and opinions alleging that there is an international conspiracy theory faking climate change in order to impose draconian social control and instigate a reset. If readers already believe that, then they will probably like the book. If they don’t already believe it, then they will probably dislike the book.
Not recommended.
The author makes it clear in the appendix that he is a medical doctor, writing under a pseudonym so that no one can target him to remove his medical licence. That is probably a prudent move, as the book attacks many aspects of modern medicine.
Vaccines are denied. So, also is the usefulness of peer review. In fact, in chapter 168 the author tells readers to ‘ignore anyone who says that peer reviews are useful…’ He insists that they are just ‘a bunch of dumb and corrupt scientists paid by drug companies… confirming that garbage produced by dumb and corrupt scientists… is essential.’ Wow. So essentially nothing can be evidenced or proven, as the principle mechanism for what counts as proof is now to be jettisoned. Sadly, there are no footnotes or references to justify such a starkly negative opinion in chapter 168. It is just asserted.
The books relationship with evidence and argument is problematic from its earliest pages. For example, we are told that the BBC is ‘the most sexist, ageist and racist media organisation… (which has) little interest in discussion, debate or… evidence or facts.’
Again, nothing is cited to justify that opinion. But more interestingly, why is the author accusing the BBC of sexism and ageism. Even if those allegations were true, they are entirely irrelevant to what the book is supposed to be about, which is Climate Change. All that such comments do, is attempt to “poison the source’ as a negative ad hominem argument. That of course is a fallacious way of arguing.
The book goes on to criticise in strident language, asserting that others are gullible, virtue signalling their commitment to nonsensical ideas. But again, there is next to no evidence or justification presented for any of those opinions. There is an occasional reference to Vernon Coleman’s books, but that is hardly an uncontroversial source.
Overall, there is little point in reading the book for information, as all that it gives is a set of assertions and opinions alleging that there is an international conspiracy theory faking climate change in order to impose draconian social control and instigate a reset. If readers already believe that, then they will probably like the book. If they don’t already believe it, then they will probably dislike the book.
Not recommended.
December 11, 2024
95% BS
Total rant and 95% BS/5% fact.
Mr King: never travel abroad because without vaccination you will not survive. Good luck.
Total rant and 95% BS/5% fact.
Mr King: never travel abroad because without vaccination you will not survive. Good luck.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews