What do you think?
Rate this book


283 pages, Kindle Edition
Published April 15, 2025
To his credit, Richard K. Vedder puts his provocative thesis right in his three-word title: Let Colleges Fail. And, as hinted by his subtitle, he's referring to Joseph Schumpeter's concept of capitalism's "creative destruction", the notion that economic health isn't only driven by positive innovation of new goods, but also getting rid of the old, stale, less utile products, services, and methods. That's often painfully brutal, we might discuss how to ameliorate the agony, but it's often simply necessary for progress and improvement.
Vedder points to a telling fact: America's dynamic economy churns the top firms from year to year. (See Mark J. Perry: Only 52 US Companies Have Been on the Fortune 500 Since 1955, Thanks to the ‘creative Destruction’ That Fuels Economic Prosperity.) While the "top" US universities are pretty much the same bunch, year after year.
Even more indicative, as Macalester College's ex-President pointed out recently: the "sage on a stage" lecture model has been solidly in place for at least six centuries, back to when barbers performed surgery. Really?
It's not just simple lack of innovation. Vedder notes that although American higher ed is usually considered the best in the world, it has multiple problems that indicate its underlying malaise: falling enrollments; decreased public confidence; a censorious ideological climate; a (resulting) lack of intellectual diversity; ever-increasing cost; a manifest failure (in many cases) to teach students much; administrative bloat; increased inaccessibility to the poor; an overall poor "return on investment"; and (finally) inefficient and wasteful use of human and physical resources.
Vedder backs up all ten of these problems pretty convincingly. And points his finger at a number of underlying causes. Number one, of course, is the money spigot flowing from taxpayers, via federal and state governments, to higher ed. And there are more subtle government goodies, like tax treatment. (The university dining hall doesn't charge its customers sales tax; the pizza place a few hundred yards down Main Street is required to.) Accreditation is a woke racket. Athletics: an expensive distraction. Current governance is designed to maintain the cozy status quo.
So Vedder's overall recommendations are to reduce the role of government. Or at least make government efforts more effective. For example, if you must subsidize something with taxpayer cash, subsidize students, instead of throwing money at institutions. As private companies do, universities should "spin off" functions irrelevant to their educational purpose: e.g. housing, dining, sports, …
I've only scratched the surface; Vedder is full of good ideas. I'm not sure how many are feasible, even in the current crisis atmosphere; you'd think higher ed would be ripe for "creative destruction", but the forces dedicated to stasis are pretty powerful.