What do you think?
Rate this book
The Captains' Coup: From Dictatorship to Democracy in Portugal
The first English edition of legendary journalist Wilfred Burchett’s eye-witness reporting on the bloodless Portuguese military coup and “Carnation Revolution” of 1974-1975
Legendary journalist Wilfred Burchett’s eyewitness account of the military coup d’étatthat ended authoritarian dictatorship and established democracy in Portugal.
The Captains’ Coup offers an insightful, poignant narrative of events during the first year following the near-bloodless left-wing “Carnation Revolution” of April 25, 1974 that overthrew a nearly five-decade-long fascistic dictatorship led by António Salazar, and established democracy in Portugal.
This first-ever English edition marks the 50th anniversary of the Portuguese Revolution.
Legendary journalist Wilfred Burchett’s eyewitness account of the military coup d’étatthat ended authoritarian dictatorship and established democracy in Portugal.
The Captains’ Coup offers an insightful, poignant narrative of events during the first year following the near-bloodless left-wing “Carnation Revolution” of April 25, 1974 that overthrew a nearly five-decade-long fascistic dictatorship led by António Salazar, and established democracy in Portugal.
This first-ever English edition marks the 50th anniversary of the Portuguese Revolution.
353 pages, Kindle Edition
Published April 22, 2025
12 people are currently reading
86 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
July 7, 2025
Daniela Melo and Timothy Walker are editors of Wilfred Burchett's book, The Captains' Coup, an account of Portugal's Carnation Revolution. The couple are Massachusetts professors both well-steeped in Portuguese politics and history. While bookstore browsing in Lisbon they came across Wilfred Burchett's book in Portuguese translation, then attempted to locate the original English edition. The hunt for Burchett's original manuscript plays a small but intriguing part in the introduction to the book, and Melo and Walker's scholarly notes (and the occasional correction of Burchett's errors) serve readers very well.
Burchett's "you were there" reporting is exciting and very readable, while at the same time he provides much-needed background into the dismal conditions in both the industrial centers of Portugal and in the Alentejo and other agricultural areas.
In 1974 Burchett dropped everything to travel to Portugal to observe the Carnation Revolution (still in progress) and to interview many of the major protagonists, the minor characters, and everyday people who participated in shutting down the world's longest-running empire (at that point) together with a brutal fascist regime.
Burchett's accounts give you a sense of how desperate the Portuguese people were. He paints a detailed picture of the brutality, senselessness, and economic recklessness of conducting multiple simultaneous colonial wars in Africa. At one point 57% of the Portuguese economy was devoted to wars in Africa, with horrendous casualties of the young men of the bourgoisie and a growing number of working class army and naval officers.
Even as the Portuguese dictatorship was playing colonizer, Portuguese workers were themselves colonized by European and American corporations which treated them as disposable equipment and relied on PIDE, the Portuguese secret police, to crush any labor disturbances. Absentee landlords created many levels of misery for those from whom they stole traditionally communal land. The peasantry was overwhelmingly illiterate and the Church, particularly in the North of Portugal, played an exceptionally reactionary role in mis-informing parishioners and in collaborating with the fascists.
The Portuguese "revolution" was, true to the book's title, more a coup. The Portuguese working class did not rise up in any Marxist sense of revolution. Although different elements of a disgruntled and worn-out military competed for the loyalty of the people, and though the "revolution" at first had some of the characteristics of peasant and worker revolts, particularly against the latifundia, rebellion was quickly quashed by the Socialist Party with a certain amount of acquiescence of the Portuguese Communist Party, which feared not only widespread strikes but that what the "captains" had unleashed could not be put back on a leash.
An Afterword by New Left scholar Tariq Ali attempts to draw lessons from the failure of the Carnation Revolution, fixing blame on the Communists, "ultra-leftists," the Socialists, the CIA, and the Portuguese military itself. Ali quotes Lenin: "without the independent activity of the masses, there can be no revolution," and he goes on to slam the various factions for suppressing the independent activity of the masses.
But at the end of the day, the Carnation Revolution was a bourgeois revolution, fomented by the sons of the privileged classes. To quote Lenin again, "without the independent activity of the masses, there can be no revolution." As Ali points out, the Captains and the young bourgeois officer corps which spawned the revolution had also considered a Plan B – becoming executives in Capitalist enterprises in a modernized European social democratic state.
It didn't take them long to get there.
The authors gave this talk at the Fulbright Portugal @65 Talks in June 2025:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URAjZ...
Burchett's "you were there" reporting is exciting and very readable, while at the same time he provides much-needed background into the dismal conditions in both the industrial centers of Portugal and in the Alentejo and other agricultural areas.
In 1974 Burchett dropped everything to travel to Portugal to observe the Carnation Revolution (still in progress) and to interview many of the major protagonists, the minor characters, and everyday people who participated in shutting down the world's longest-running empire (at that point) together with a brutal fascist regime.
Burchett's accounts give you a sense of how desperate the Portuguese people were. He paints a detailed picture of the brutality, senselessness, and economic recklessness of conducting multiple simultaneous colonial wars in Africa. At one point 57% of the Portuguese economy was devoted to wars in Africa, with horrendous casualties of the young men of the bourgoisie and a growing number of working class army and naval officers.
Even as the Portuguese dictatorship was playing colonizer, Portuguese workers were themselves colonized by European and American corporations which treated them as disposable equipment and relied on PIDE, the Portuguese secret police, to crush any labor disturbances. Absentee landlords created many levels of misery for those from whom they stole traditionally communal land. The peasantry was overwhelmingly illiterate and the Church, particularly in the North of Portugal, played an exceptionally reactionary role in mis-informing parishioners and in collaborating with the fascists.
The Portuguese "revolution" was, true to the book's title, more a coup. The Portuguese working class did not rise up in any Marxist sense of revolution. Although different elements of a disgruntled and worn-out military competed for the loyalty of the people, and though the "revolution" at first had some of the characteristics of peasant and worker revolts, particularly against the latifundia, rebellion was quickly quashed by the Socialist Party with a certain amount of acquiescence of the Portuguese Communist Party, which feared not only widespread strikes but that what the "captains" had unleashed could not be put back on a leash.
An Afterword by New Left scholar Tariq Ali attempts to draw lessons from the failure of the Carnation Revolution, fixing blame on the Communists, "ultra-leftists," the Socialists, the CIA, and the Portuguese military itself. Ali quotes Lenin: "without the independent activity of the masses, there can be no revolution," and he goes on to slam the various factions for suppressing the independent activity of the masses.
But at the end of the day, the Carnation Revolution was a bourgeois revolution, fomented by the sons of the privileged classes. To quote Lenin again, "without the independent activity of the masses, there can be no revolution." As Ali points out, the Captains and the young bourgeois officer corps which spawned the revolution had also considered a Plan B – becoming executives in Capitalist enterprises in a modernized European social democratic state.
It didn't take them long to get there.
The authors gave this talk at the Fulbright Portugal @65 Talks in June 2025:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URAjZ...
October 24, 2025
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Carnation Revolution, from the pen of a diligent and sympathetic Australian reporter who was on the scene. I met the editors of this book and heard their description of the work that went in to finding the manuscripts -- what an important record of that tumultuous time in Portugal, for us English-language readers. The editors manage to maintain the reporter's voice (not always a smooth flow from one chapter to the next) while adding preface, introduction, and footnotes to guide the reader through many acronyms and names. These are detailed notes of an experienced reporter; they paint a descriptive picture of the bleak life before the revolution and the exhilaration yet chaos of the aftermath. To this day we wonder about the various turns that could have been taken in that chaos, but have resulted in today's government and peaceful society. The many names and titles listed are confusing. And the afterword, by Tariq Ali, seems out of character with the rest of the book, more strident and accusatory. Still, a valuable read for anyone interested in the Carnation Revolution.
September 12, 2025
A fascinating history by someone who spoke to many of the people who made it. Two things struck me :
1) How relatively few people in the military are required to make dramatic change happen in a country if they enjoy the even passive support of large segments of the populace (although other types of change would require active engagement of larger segments of the populace);
2) What a great example it was for the book itself and the afterward to be written by two different people with different strategic positions and different analyses of what happened and what could have happened. Well done, that.
1) How relatively few people in the military are required to make dramatic change happen in a country if they enjoy the even passive support of large segments of the populace (although other types of change would require active engagement of larger segments of the populace);
2) What a great example it was for the book itself and the afterward to be written by two different people with different strategic positions and different analyses of what happened and what could have happened. Well done, that.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews