What do you think?
Rate this book


384 pages, Paperback
First published April 22, 2025
Content warning at start: "Down in the Sea of Angels contains racist language and attitudes, sexual assault, sexual harassment, the historical sex trafficking of minors, acknowledgment of the forced labor of minors, physical and verbal abuse, violence, drug use and drug-related death."
Thank you to Angry Robot for the ARC of Down in the Sea of Angels by Khan Wong.
This is one of those books that brims with potential but stumbles under the weight of its own ambition. It’s thoughtful and certainly unique, threading together three stories across time through psychic connections and a single object. And yet, in trying to explore so many themes and timelines at once, it felt like none of them were given the space or depth they needed to truly resonate.
Maida’s narrative in 2106 had a fascinating premise. She is a psion living in a supposed utopia that quickly begins to reveal its cracks. I wanted to sit with her, to learn more about the world she was born into and how her abilities shaped her role within it, but instead we’re told much of this in large, sweeping explanations that felt emotionally distant. The political stakes are clear, yet the urgency of them didn’t fully land for me.
Li Nuan’s story, set in 1906, was by far the strongest. Her character and the painful world she inhabits were vividly drawn. The themes of exploitation, survival, and autonomy were compelling, and I wanted more time with her. Her arc felt the most emotionally engaging, but even so, difficult subjects like sex trafficking and indentured servitude were introduced and then moved away from too quickly to leave lasting impact.
Nathan’s storyline, on the other hand, was the least compelling. I understand the narrative need to present a modern-day lens, but he felt underdeveloped. His privilege is apparent, yet the text rarely interrogates it in any meaningful way. As a result, his sections felt self-indulgent and out of sync with the more emotionally rich arcs of the other two characters.
The idea of the teacup tying them all together sounded poetic in theory, but in practice, it felt thin. I kept waiting for the deeper meaning, for the moment it would all come together in a way that felt revelatory. Instead, the connections were surface-level, which left the structure feeling fragmented and disjointed.
In the end, I think this book had three potentially interesting stories. But without a stronger emotional throughline or more cohesive integration, it read more like three novellas that occasionally interrupted each other than a fully formed novel. The writing has promise, and the ambition is admirable, but this one didn’t quite come together for me.
Follow me on socials: Instagram | TikTok @mythicalreadsreviewer.