What do you think?
Rate this book
Interpreting Jesus
Timely new essays from a renowned scholar of historical Jesus studies
Dale Allison, Jr. has long been recognized as a leading scholar in historical Jesus studies. In Interpreting Jesus, he continues to advance the discussion with the expertise and insight for which he is renowned. Within these highly original essays, Allison explores questions related to Jesus and women, Jesus and miracles, Jesus and Moses, Jesus and the last things, and method in Jesus scholarship. His sound analysis is particularly timely as scholars reconsider the historical figure of Jesus and the relationships among the canonical gospels. Allison's keen interest in developing fresh perspectives make this book an important contribution to the field; readers can be grateful that, as he puts it, "enduring curiosity has kept me pondering the historical Jesus."
Dale Allison, Jr. has long been recognized as a leading scholar in historical Jesus studies. In Interpreting Jesus, he continues to advance the discussion with the expertise and insight for which he is renowned. Within these highly original essays, Allison explores questions related to Jesus and women, Jesus and miracles, Jesus and Moses, Jesus and the last things, and method in Jesus scholarship. His sound analysis is particularly timely as scholars reconsider the historical figure of Jesus and the relationships among the canonical gospels. Allison's keen interest in developing fresh perspectives make this book an important contribution to the field; readers can be grateful that, as he puts it, "enduring curiosity has kept me pondering the historical Jesus."
- GenresChristianityReligion
859 pages, Kindle Edition
Published April 10, 2025
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
July 26, 2025
Important contribution to historical Jesus studies—highly recommended
Dale C. Allison Jr.’s Interpreting Jesus stands as an important contribution to historical Jesus studies, offering both rigorous scholarship and refreshing methodological honesty. Rather than overselling what historical methods can achieve, Allison frankly acknowledges their limitations while demonstrating their genuine value.
Interpreting Jesus succeeds in advancing historical understanding while demonstrating the inherent constraints of historical inquiry. Essential reading for anyone interested in the intersection of rigorous scholarship and religious investigation.
Dale C. Allison Jr.’s Interpreting Jesus stands as an important contribution to historical Jesus studies, offering both rigorous scholarship and refreshing methodological honesty. Rather than overselling what historical methods can achieve, Allison frankly acknowledges their limitations while demonstrating their genuine value.
Interpreting Jesus succeeds in advancing historical understanding while demonstrating the inherent constraints of historical inquiry. Essential reading for anyone interested in the intersection of rigorous scholarship and religious investigation.
September 24, 2026
Really helpful treatments of 6 core issues in historical Jesus studies by a scholar who KNOWS the material and writes like he cares about the experience of reading. He says at the outset that the book originated from an article that didn't get accepted for a journal and so he decided he'd be better off doing it as part of a book. All 6 chapters have that can't-see-a-journal-printing-this feel. Allison is not rambling, but these are a bit 'looser' than what you expect in academic work. The publisher should be commended for allowing him the leeway to do this as we get a less-sanitized version of what a properly mature scholar really thinks and just actually wants to say. Not sure this would work for early undergraduate introductions to these issues, but can be valuably read by any with a basic grasp of what this set of scholarship has been up to.
September 11, 2026
See my full review in Scottish Journal of Theology at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journa...
January 15, 2026
Summary: Six essays on Jesus addressing eschatology, Moses, miracles, women with Jesus, memory, and methods of attestation.
In 2010, after completing Constructing Jesus, Dale C. Allison Jr. told his wife, “Honey, I’m done with Jesus” to which she replied, “He’ll be glad to hear that.” In the Preface to this book, he confesses, “But I was wrong. I have been unable to stay away. What he thinks now I do not know.” I cannot speak for Jesus, but I’m glad he didn’t stay away. I found each of the six essays here thought-provoking, the work of a careful scholar not afraid to engage prevailing scholarship with fresh ideas.
The first essay explores the indications that Jesus believed the “last things” were imminent and that the latter days had begun. Yet his followers had to deal with delay beyond what they expected (and we all the more). However, Allison notes the indications as Jesus nears Jerusalem and faces not only unreceptiveness but imminent death, that he foresaw some form of interim period before his triumphal return. He cites the parables of the bridegroom’s delay and the master’s delay as examples. And he looks at examples of contingency in Jewish literature and allows for the possibility of the delay being contingent on the occurrence of certain events.
The next essay explores how Jesus’ life may be seen as a type of fulfillment or enactment of Moses. He does this by way of noting some of the parallels between Moses and Simeon Stylites and exploring how these map onto Jesus. Allison follows this with what I thought one of the most important essays that took exception in some ways to the radical skepticism of Jesus scholarship of the miracle accounts. He allows, with scholars like Michael Licona, that historical investigation does not require on to a priori rule out the miracle accounts. He notes credible contemporary testimony documented both in Catholicism and scholars like Craig Keener. Should the possibility of credible testimony to the miraculous be ruled out for the accounts of scripture?
The Chosen introduces the idea of women being included in the company of Jesus, sometimes traveling with Jesus and the male disciples. While Allison does not interact with this portrayal, his next essay discusses the biblical accounts. He notes the support women gave, and their presence in various accounts. Allison also notes Jesus teaching on the lustful look and other issues relating to men and women. He seems to be reluctant to allow for women as a permanent part of an itinerating band, while allowing for them to accompany a larger group to Jerusalem for feasts.
But how reliable are the memories of the eyewitnesses? Allison’s next essay addresses the question of the reliability of memory. He particularly has in view Richard Bauckham’s strong defense of the eyewitness accounts of the life of Jesus. He considers the case of Peter and Mark and how the literature on memory leads him to bring a measure of caution in weighing their accounts. While not dismissing Bauckham, he raises the question of whether all memories are equally reliable. May some be more reliable than others?
The final essay is a deep dive into the criteria and methodologies used in historical Jesus scholarship. The question is what may we most confidently attribute to Jesus? For example, scholars consider themes that have multiple attestation as more likely to be authentic. They discredit independent sources. Likewise, there is the criteria of dissimilarity. That is, scholars credit Jesus with saying things found nowhere else. Allison explores a number of exceptions to this methodology.
I must confess that as a non-professional, I knew of Allison but have not read his prior works. While evangelicals may not agree with all his conclusions, his careful scholarship also offers encouragement. What struck me about these essays was a sense of even-handed fairness and an openness to modify his own views. I appreciated his engagement with scholars like Michael Licona, Craig Keener, and Richard Bauckham. And I appreciated his candor in wrestling with questions any of us who have studied the gospels at length have wrestled with.
_______________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.
In 2010, after completing Constructing Jesus, Dale C. Allison Jr. told his wife, “Honey, I’m done with Jesus” to which she replied, “He’ll be glad to hear that.” In the Preface to this book, he confesses, “But I was wrong. I have been unable to stay away. What he thinks now I do not know.” I cannot speak for Jesus, but I’m glad he didn’t stay away. I found each of the six essays here thought-provoking, the work of a careful scholar not afraid to engage prevailing scholarship with fresh ideas.
The first essay explores the indications that Jesus believed the “last things” were imminent and that the latter days had begun. Yet his followers had to deal with delay beyond what they expected (and we all the more). However, Allison notes the indications as Jesus nears Jerusalem and faces not only unreceptiveness but imminent death, that he foresaw some form of interim period before his triumphal return. He cites the parables of the bridegroom’s delay and the master’s delay as examples. And he looks at examples of contingency in Jewish literature and allows for the possibility of the delay being contingent on the occurrence of certain events.
The next essay explores how Jesus’ life may be seen as a type of fulfillment or enactment of Moses. He does this by way of noting some of the parallels between Moses and Simeon Stylites and exploring how these map onto Jesus. Allison follows this with what I thought one of the most important essays that took exception in some ways to the radical skepticism of Jesus scholarship of the miracle accounts. He allows, with scholars like Michael Licona, that historical investigation does not require on to a priori rule out the miracle accounts. He notes credible contemporary testimony documented both in Catholicism and scholars like Craig Keener. Should the possibility of credible testimony to the miraculous be ruled out for the accounts of scripture?
The Chosen introduces the idea of women being included in the company of Jesus, sometimes traveling with Jesus and the male disciples. While Allison does not interact with this portrayal, his next essay discusses the biblical accounts. He notes the support women gave, and their presence in various accounts. Allison also notes Jesus teaching on the lustful look and other issues relating to men and women. He seems to be reluctant to allow for women as a permanent part of an itinerating band, while allowing for them to accompany a larger group to Jerusalem for feasts.
But how reliable are the memories of the eyewitnesses? Allison’s next essay addresses the question of the reliability of memory. He particularly has in view Richard Bauckham’s strong defense of the eyewitness accounts of the life of Jesus. He considers the case of Peter and Mark and how the literature on memory leads him to bring a measure of caution in weighing their accounts. While not dismissing Bauckham, he raises the question of whether all memories are equally reliable. May some be more reliable than others?
The final essay is a deep dive into the criteria and methodologies used in historical Jesus scholarship. The question is what may we most confidently attribute to Jesus? For example, scholars consider themes that have multiple attestation as more likely to be authentic. They discredit independent sources. Likewise, there is the criteria of dissimilarity. That is, scholars credit Jesus with saying things found nowhere else. Allison explores a number of exceptions to this methodology.
I must confess that as a non-professional, I knew of Allison but have not read his prior works. While evangelicals may not agree with all his conclusions, his careful scholarship also offers encouragement. What struck me about these essays was a sense of even-handed fairness and an openness to modify his own views. I appreciated his engagement with scholars like Michael Licona, Craig Keener, and Richard Bauckham. And I appreciated his candor in wrestling with questions any of us who have studied the gospels at length have wrestled with.
_______________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.
July 31, 2025
Dale Allison has become one of those authors whose books I’ll read no matter the topic. What I most appreciate about him is that, although he is a Christian who believes the resurrection appearances of Jesus were veridical and not merely hallucinatory, he doesn’t allow his personal beliefs to skew his work as a scholar and historian. He follows the evidence wherever it leads—which, if nothing else, makes him someone I can trust.
The most interesting chapter for me was Chapter 3, where he explores whether it’s possible, from a historical standpoint, to determine if Jesus truly had supernatural abilities. Drawing on contemporary accounts of miraculous phenomena across various religious traditions, he suggests that instead of dismissing miracle stories as ancient fantasy, we might consider the possibility that individuals like Jesus could have exhibited abilities that defy conventional explanation.
Allison also seems persuaded by the sheer number of miracle stories across different sources—Mark, Q, special material in Matthew and Luke, John, and even Josephus. Even if one concedes that many of these stories were prone to embellishment or fabrication, the volume and variety of reports suggest that Jesus may have occasionally performed deeds that struck people as extraordinary. Personally, as someone who has never witnessed anything supernatural and tends to be skeptical of mystical experiences, UFOs, ghosts, etc., I’m not sure how convinced I am by these arguments. Still, I try to stay open to the idea that there may be more to reality than what can be empirically measured.
More compelling to me was the final chapter. I’ve often wondered whether we can really know if Jesus said a particular sentence or if a certain event actually happened. Allison’s approach is to look for patterns across the various sources, allowing for generalizations: Jesus taught about the kingdom of God, thought highly of John the Baptist, spoke of God as Father, used hyperbole, and so on. I much prefer this to the traditional historical criteria—such as multiple attestation or the criterion of embarrassment—which have always felt limited in what they can actually tell us about Jesus.
Like all of Allison’s books, I thoroughly enjoyed this one and will need to reread it to fully grasp everything he’s getting at. Highly recommended.
The most interesting chapter for me was Chapter 3, where he explores whether it’s possible, from a historical standpoint, to determine if Jesus truly had supernatural abilities. Drawing on contemporary accounts of miraculous phenomena across various religious traditions, he suggests that instead of dismissing miracle stories as ancient fantasy, we might consider the possibility that individuals like Jesus could have exhibited abilities that defy conventional explanation.
Allison also seems persuaded by the sheer number of miracle stories across different sources—Mark, Q, special material in Matthew and Luke, John, and even Josephus. Even if one concedes that many of these stories were prone to embellishment or fabrication, the volume and variety of reports suggest that Jesus may have occasionally performed deeds that struck people as extraordinary. Personally, as someone who has never witnessed anything supernatural and tends to be skeptical of mystical experiences, UFOs, ghosts, etc., I’m not sure how convinced I am by these arguments. Still, I try to stay open to the idea that there may be more to reality than what can be empirically measured.
More compelling to me was the final chapter. I’ve often wondered whether we can really know if Jesus said a particular sentence or if a certain event actually happened. Allison’s approach is to look for patterns across the various sources, allowing for generalizations: Jesus taught about the kingdom of God, thought highly of John the Baptist, spoke of God as Father, used hyperbole, and so on. I much prefer this to the traditional historical criteria—such as multiple attestation or the criterion of embarrassment—which have always felt limited in what they can actually tell us about Jesus.
Like all of Allison’s books, I thoroughly enjoyed this one and will need to reread it to fully grasp everything he’s getting at. Highly recommended.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 13, 2026
This book from Dale Allison is a collection of essays about Jesus from a historian's perspective. In it, he demonstrates the use of "recurrent attestation" as a tool for determining what things in the Gospels likely go back to the actual historical Jesus. As described in the last essay in this book, recurrent attestation focuses on recurrent patterns and themes found across the Gospel writings (as opposed to the criteria of multiple attestation which focuses on multiple sources for an isolated saying or story). The author thinks that the criteria of recurrent attestation will yield better results for Biblical research than applying the canonical historical criteria (e.g. multiple attestation) to isolated sayings or stories.
I found this book both interesting and frustrating. Interesting because it demonstrated how biblical scholars go about determining the historicity of something found in the Bible. Frustrating because of both the thoroughness of the analysis (i.e. it's really long-winded) and the disappointing results (i.e. almost nothing can be determined with certainty based on the evidence we have). I'm both impressed by the unbiased nature of the analysis (i.e. this is not a Christian apologetic book) and dismayed by the skeptical feel of it all. I clearly would not survive as a Biblical scholar.
This is not an easy read. While I found the writing to be accessible, it is an academic book with loads of footnotes and citations. For conservative Christians, it will be challenging and perhaps disturbing. But all in all, I learned a lot from it and will probably read more from this author in the future.
For me, the essay on miracles (Everywhere A Miracle) and the essay on memory (I Remember It Well, Or Not) were the most interesting and thought-provoking. I would recommend this book simply for those 2 essays. They are worth the price of admission.
I found this book both interesting and frustrating. Interesting because it demonstrated how biblical scholars go about determining the historicity of something found in the Bible. Frustrating because of both the thoroughness of the analysis (i.e. it's really long-winded) and the disappointing results (i.e. almost nothing can be determined with certainty based on the evidence we have). I'm both impressed by the unbiased nature of the analysis (i.e. this is not a Christian apologetic book) and dismayed by the skeptical feel of it all. I clearly would not survive as a Biblical scholar.
This is not an easy read. While I found the writing to be accessible, it is an academic book with loads of footnotes and citations. For conservative Christians, it will be challenging and perhaps disturbing. But all in all, I learned a lot from it and will probably read more from this author in the future.
For me, the essay on miracles (Everywhere A Miracle) and the essay on memory (I Remember It Well, Or Not) were the most interesting and thought-provoking. I would recommend this book simply for those 2 essays. They are worth the price of admission.
April 26, 2026
Another excellent volume from one of my absolute favorite writers. This wasn't quite the groundbreaking experience that I enjoyed in his Resurrection of Jesus, but it was engaging, lucid, and persuasive all the way through--even though I initially bought this solely for chapter 3 on the "Metanormal Jesus."
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews