This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
As a lay student of color, this book was written with the me of 100 years ago in mind, but now it's hard to know if it's of any true use to me any more. Certainly there were passages that seemed informative, but a lot of the technical discussion of color and it's properties seems wildly out of date in a world with computer screens and color pickers.
So instead I just tried to read it as an interesting point of view and historical account, and I enjoyed it for that. The passage about color-blindness was very interesting, and then she threw out this quote that cracked me up:
"A person so color-blind as to see no difference between the scarlet of a geranium blossom and the green of its leaves... is still and enthusiastic and seemingly an intelligent admirer of landscape and art. One cannot say from what the enjoyment arises, but it is certainly there." (9)
This is a little unfair though, she doesn't come across this callous again and is generally much more thoughtful, like this part about studying nature I enjoyed:
"Students in art and science are constantly bidden to go to nature for the abundant secrets she is ready to reveal to those who seek and prize them, and why should not workers in simpler, if not lower, occupations, be sent to the same source, which is so bountiful as to contain something for every one, and so, profiting by her fulness, learn at the same time to find contentment and joy in their work?" (114)
Ultimately this was my main takeaway, her love of color and the inspiration we can draw from natural sources, so well exampled in her fabulous plates at the back of the book.
Well written gem for a lay student of color. I helped fund a Kickstarter campaign with the goal of reprinting the original work with color plates and accessories. I probably need to spend more time reviewing colors, their characteristics and how color fits into everyday life.
This book is very thought provoking. I flipped back and forth from the text to the illustrations. I look up some of her recommendations and sources. Amazing that a book written over 100 years ago can still be technically relevant.
Read an article about this curious little tome on www.PublicDomainReview.org (an even curious-er website packed with brief academic articles about fantastic--you guessed it--out-of-copyright works). It's viewable in color on www.archive.org -- another wonderful site.
There's an appendix of color swatches to illustrate the concepts discussed therein, which I found as artful as it is practical. Much to be said for the charm and quaintness of "primitive" books, in comparison to our modern over-produced books, the designers of which might well take advantage of this author's discussion of complementary / contrasting colors/designs.