For the last several years, Baldacci has been producing two books a year (and sometimes even three) and focusing most of his attention on his series characters of Amos Decker (Memory Man), Atlee Pine, Aloysius Archer, and Travis Devine (6:20 Man). However, Balducci is a student of history and likes to step outside of his current day thrillers to write one-off historical novels set during turbulent eras and times of serious change. This time he takes us to the dark days of World War II when the world was under siege.
“Strangers in Time” takes place in London, England. The year is 1944. Germany is bombing the city and its survivors are living day to day with a hope for the end of the second great war and a better future. It is the story of Charlie Matters, Molly Wakefield, and Ignatius Oliver, and Desiree DuBose – each from entirely different backgrounds, experiences, and beliefs. And more importantly, each seeking healing from the personal losses of them are suffering from.
Fourteen-year-old Charlie Matters is a street urchin, surviving on the streets much like Dicken’s fictional character of Oliver Twist. Both of his parents are dead and he sleeps in a box in his grandma’s East End slums open-air apartment (due to the impacts of the German bombing raids). Every day he lives by his wits, scraping, stealing, and finding small jobs that will allow him to get old enough to fight in the war…
Fifteen-year-old Molly Wakefield is returning to London after spending five years away in the country where her parents sent her to be safely away from the bombings. She has not heard from either of her parents for a while and the money they were sending to pay for her has stopped coming. However, the decimated London she finds is almost unrecognizable from the city she left. Even worse, finding her parent’s empty house in Chelsea sets her on a mission to find out what happened to both of her missing parents…
Ignatius Oliver is the widowed owner of The Book Keep bookstore, previously owned and run by his wife, Imogen, before she died a year or two ago. Her death has been hard on him, and he has not emotionally gotten over it, still suffering in his grief and loss. Instead of moving forward, he has focused his pain on the war efforts. He’s keeping secrets that involve his loyalty and legacy…
As the German bombs rang down from above almost daily, these three scarred individuals’ cross paths, forcing them to come together and support each other in their biggest challenges yet, creating a connective bond that will last a lifetime…
As you can imagine, this is also a different kind of Baldacci novel, full of history, war, political, social, and economic elements from over 75 years ago, during a time of global conflict and atrocities. Baldacci doesn’t shy away or pull back from the reality of what it was like to survive in London during the dark times of Germany’s ongoing bombings. He attacks it with visceral and immersive examples and lessons of what living during that horrible time period was like, and the impact on life that came from a lack infrastructure, food and perishables, living conditions, and especially medical assistance. Baldacci does not sugarcoat in any way what was a brutal struggle to get by on a daily basis.
The good news on this one is that Baldacci settled down pretty fast into his storytelling groove that we all love and enjoy, what I think of as his special talent and secret sauce. His characters, storylines, and setting (location and history) were compelling and gripping. Baldacci knows each of his characters intimately and he makes us care about them intimately and personally. For an author that produces two books a year, Baldacci shows that he hasn’t lost his ability to create immersive and intriguing plotting, character depth, and pacing.
There is some bad news too, which probably says more about me than it does the book itself/\.
One, the overall plotlines were a bit disjointed at times throughout the book. It felt like Charlie’s and Ignatius’s storylines were much fleshed out and had more meat to them. In contrast, Molly storylines had great potential and started out well, but kind of got lost throughout the second half of the book, and for me really faltered at the end from an execution standpoint. For me, they fizzled out a bit and left me feeling emptier than I think was intended.
Second, and this is a surprising comment for me, this is the first book that I have ever read by Baldacci that I didn’t like the ending. It left me feeling melancholy, sad, and empty. I believe that it was the right ending for him to write, but I just didn’t connect with it in the ways that I usually do. I hated what happened to Ignatius (no details and no spoilers). Yes, it was probably the right thing to do with him, but it just hit me much harder than I thought it would and left a bad taste in my mouth, which I will assume is my issue on not one most readers will share.
Overall, “Strangers in Time” is an uncomfortable journey back in time when things were different and many nations were at war with Adolph Hitler and his German Nazi regime. I believe that did not intend for this to be a comfortable and escapist read and shouldn’t be treated that way. This historical novel was a serious reminder of those who were England’s own version of what Tom Brokaw referred to as “The Greatest Generation” – citizens who came of age during the Great Depression, fought in World War II, and played a key role in building our modern nation. Baldacci challenges us to remember our ugly history and do better moving forward. It’s never too late to take a personal inventory and make any necessary changes needed. Even though I am hung up personally on the ending, the lessons were well delivered.