joey morris annoyed me a bit at the beginning but in all I think this book has a lot of value in it.
the beginning was rough though. the very first sentence is "if you have ever found yourself walking through a grove of trees and felt your whole world shift, then you just might have the stirrings of a witch within you." I think this goes under the category of things people say just because it sounds good that I really take literally and latch onto and pick apart where most people just skim right over it. but for me, this was a TERRIBLE opening sentence for the book. first of all, what does it mean??? what does "felt your whole world shift" mean in reality? is this something that happens physically? does she mean you felt momentarily off-balance and then everything righted itself but it doesn't quite feel the same? is it some sort of realization that you are connected to the trees spiritually? secondly, this is a very specific and high bar for being a witch. if you've had this profound but vague experience, under the particular circumstance of walking through a grove of trees (sorry, if it happens at the beach or in the desert or in the hills or mountains or at a lake etc. I guess you're out of luck) then you just...might...have the stirrings...of being a witch. I mean, it's ridiculous. so as my first encounter with joey morris, this was not good. having read the whole book I'm imagining she was just having trouble getting started writing and just tossed off any old thing to make the page not be blank.
sometimes she says something and I just don't know what she means. "witchcraft without knowledge is reckless, but witchcraft without heart is vivisection." witchcraft without heart is performing investigative or experimental surgery on a living being? I think what she might have been trying to say is that removing the heart from witchcraft is akin to vivisection, but she makes it sound like if you take the metaphorical heart away from a witch, she starts grabbing up animals and doing unnecessary surgery on them. that was also within the first few pages.
I had the same issue I have with a lot of witchcraft books with this one - this sweeping assumption that people are completely disconnected from nature. I'm not into ceremonial magic so the types of magic I do read about tend to be heavily nature-based. but in this book in particular it was quite unnerving to have her one second being like hey, learn the name of some types of birds and animals, try to take a walk outside and commune with nature, and the next second she's talking about riding the hedge. it goes from assuming a sheer beginner who can't even name the kinds of trees in their yard to non-beginner techniques.
she has near the beginning a section that says "the idea that we are a part of nature, not separate from it, is a keystone to many different modalities of witchcraft." yes, agreed. that's exactly why I kind of expect even people picking up a 101 witchcraft book, which I would not class this book as, have some sort of connection to nature. I think witchcraft authors in general get too remedial on this topic. I would prefer an assumption that someone has some sort of affinity with nature if they are picking up a book on hedge witchery - although astral travel is a big component of hedge witchery, there's a plant-based structure right in the name of it. morris goes on to say "in a modern world that has disconnected us from nature, the reclaiming of this idea - and seeing how grounded in human history it is - can be a revelation. you may have already felt this connection as you stood in awe of a beautiful sunset or felt empathetically moved to protect the local wildlife." I just think witchcraft authors exaggerate how much of a cyberworld everyone lives in. yes, there are indoor people who don't like weather or bugs or snakes or things you find outside. but there are also a plethora of non-witches who are deeply engaged with nature - hikers, forest bathers, outdoor sportspeople of all kinds, people who go camping, people who go to national parks, state parks, local parks, who visit waterfalls or beaches on vacation, people who walk their dogs, etc. young children love to be outside, even in this day and age, and parents don't love them to be cooped up inside with all their energy. the cover of the book shows a stag seen through a viney leafy portal. are you even going to pick this book up without an affinity for nature? these witchcraft authors really seem to think it's really unusual to watch a sunset or love the ocean. I don't know, I guess maybe there are people that go to a national park on vacation and then come home and sit in front of the tv and never feel a real connection.
anyway, right after that, she goes on to say "I felt called to environmental issues aged six and felt very cross that there was seemingly little I could do to help at that age. I signed up to the RSPCA magazine with my pocket money and supported the animals there nonetheless." then she immediately drops into "it's a powerful reminder that we're not above nature and but meant to be a part of it", which seems like it connects to the sentence about feeling the connection to nature when you're loving the sunset, not when you're six and giving your allowance to save dogs and cats, which doesn't seem super naturey anyway. that whole bit about when she was six just seems dropped in there as a brag. YOU all are sooooo disconnected from nature - not me! I've been an environmentalist since I was six. due to the way it doesn't quite fit and it seems like she added it in, I guess an editor could have asked her to give an example from her own life of when she first felt this connection to nature (probably thinking they were going to get a story about her walking through a grove of trees and feeling her whole world shift), but it really comes off as just this inserted boast about herself.
so yeah, it was a rough start. then she goes on to talk about the three realms in the celtic worldview and the cauldrons of wisdom, motion, and warming in your body (roughly the head, heart, and stomach) and how these connect to the inner sacred grove and the axis mundi/world tree and how to use these elements for flying the hedge and shapeshifting. it's very much her particular point of view but I did find a lot of value in this whole discussion. she has a lot of visualization exercises that as usual I find too specific as they are - visualize this in the center of your body, with this color light - mat auryn does this too, gets very specific about the color of light you should be seeing. what I think this comes down to is how they in particular see things and they haven't really been able to separate out what is more generally useful and what is very individualized. I was raised atheist and so as far as matters of religion and spirituality, I have a lot of trouble with anything too specific. that goes for the christian story all the way to witchcraft practitioners giving you a certain wording for a spell or telling you to visualize this thing in this color light. I mean, even if they said, I don't know what color this will be for you, for me it's blue because x y and z, that would be an improvement - even if it was just, for me it's blue. and she has a lot of specific visualizations to encounter various spirits - she always says your experience may vary and that's valid, but she does give these very particular visualizations. in the one for nettle, she even has you stepping on a nettle and then apologizing, which seems like a very odd way to proscribe people start a relationship with a plant spirit.
she did have a weird bit in the section where she's giving visualizations for connecting with different plants. she hedges (see what I did there) as to whether this is pathworking or actual astral travel. the set up seems more elaborate than just pathworking, but she provides a specific visualization for what happens, she doesn't just say, yah, go down through your cauldrons out into the otherworld and call on nettle and see what transpires. it's a whole little play she's set out. so she tells you to call on bindweed, then she tells you what nettle says to you, then she says sit with those words and see how they make you feel. then when you're ready, thank the spirit of nettle, "you may wish to give an offering of blood or breath (in the spirit world). you can sing or speak words of gratitude." then she says you may want to drink a "libation" such as tea or water. "see how it makes you feel after doing so and journal that experience too". then she says to bow and go back the way you came, through the hedge, grounding back into our world, and opening your eyes and coming back to yourself. ok....so I was journaling with my eyes closed? in an altered meditative state? make it make sense. she also says "and journal that experience too" despite that being the first point in the exercise where she's mentioned journaling. so I feel like she just messed something up here. maybe she intended for these to be more casual pathworking that you were journaling about then made them into something closer to astral travel. in any case, that doesn't make sense. you're making an offering in the spirit world, then you're drinking a cup of tea? from your kitchen or does spirit of nettle hand you one? it's just misplaced. this would bother me more if I intended to actually use these visualizations the way she has them here, which I don't. in the end, this is not the only book I'm reading about riding the hedge, so I'm not dependent on her in particular.
overall, there was a lot of good information here. I think the title is very accurate. I don't know that I would do things just as she does them, but I feel like this was well worth reading and I'm happy to have it on my shelf.