I really wanted to like this book, but it just fell very flat. There were numerous things that kept poping up that REALLY bothered me.
First off was the familiarity the author tried to establish with the characters. No other ST author I've read always refers to James T. Kirk as "Jim". As in "Jim said..." or "Jim acknowledged." or "Bones told Jim." It was the same for all the characters. It was if the author took the friendly names/nicknames and threw out everything else. Very not-Trek. The relationship between Kirk, McCoy and Spock (Or Jim, Bones, and the Vulcan, as the author constantly refers to them) was not at all Star Trek. McCoy sounded more like Spock, and Spock sounded like someone else entirely. Kirk was by far the worst.
Secondly, all the data in the book about the Klingon's comes from John Ford's FASA RPG material. That, if used sparingly, is actually good. The author, however, slapped it on like a coat of latex paint, then went a step further and didn't explain any of the subtle quirks of Ford's work. The author makes several references to "The black fleet", which he never explains. Or why Klingons in this novel have really long names. Or (Lord knows why) the author kept repeating the phrase "the naked stars". Or what the hell a "Thought Admiral" is. It's all in the FASA books, but far from common knowledge. I was a big fan of the FASA RPG, but this novel beat it to death. Very un-cool.
Third, this novel was written in 1990. The author tried (poorly) to write a novel that took place just after V'Ger (ST:TMP), yet constantly eluded to details that wouldn’t be revealed until Star Trek II, III, and IV (and probably VI, but I was zoning out at that point). Stick with your time frame, author, and forget "future speculation".
Forth was the plot. It was like the Hunt for Red October, except less believable (if thats possible).