this was a disappointment. a friend and me both perhaps made a rash/spontaneous choice based on something/hype my friend had heard, and/or on slight misunderstanding/misdescription.
what didn't work for me:
😕 it's a big hardback book that feels abit empty overall.
the way that the stories are laid out creates alot of unused space, and takes up lots of space. the whole book very much felt like it was comparatively little filling alot of space 😕🥱
😕👀 the typeset/font didn't make for easy reading. there was a short piece at the end of the book about the fonts used. the font for the stories and bulk of the text had a small embellishment to some of the letters, that made it abit hard to recognise words (at least to this dyslexic reader) 🙃
😕🥱 i found the language and/or writing underwhelming. just breaking up the lines of a sentence doesn't make it poetry 🙄 and instead frequently made it stilted/jarring. i think the language aims to be poetic, but for me it didn't really sing, and often had a disjointed rhythm. and I found myself distracted by what felt like poor punctuation! this was mildly shocking/very surprising - grammar doesn't usually bother me, and I'm not usually one to spot grammatical errors (often struggling with correct grammar myself), especially if language flows and/or a story is good. but in many of the stories in found myself frequently wanting to change punctuation, sometimes a word. and there was repetition, which i usually like, but it was not within a rhythm... which made it just repetition 😕🥱
I also felt that quite alot of the stories lacked any *real* grounding in place, landscape etc... that they didn't feel *very* rooted in the British traditions they're from. i don't know if they were deliberately supposed to be more accessible/relateable for readers without deep ties to the British landscape, or if it was abit of a failing on the authors part to give them stronger foundations. and 'Tales from the Stones'? i found the subtitle pretty misleading.
😕🥱 the stories were sometimes lacking. especially eg the retelling of the story of Wayland the Smith ('The Smith's Tale') - it added nothing to, and possibly detracted from, the story compared to previous versions I've read, and i found this version quite bland, and kinda dumbed down even 🙄😕🥱
what did i like? 🤔
🙂👀 there were occasions where the language worked, usually for a short stretch, but i liked what i glimpsed within those moments.
🖤🦊 i quite liked the cunning of the fox in 'The Black Fox's Tale', and that it centred a cunning woman, and towards the end read as a story to empower women.
🖤🦅 i liked 'The Raven's Tale' abit more than others. i didn't know it was the final story (i could see there were lots of pages to come still), and it wasn't the strongest ending (to the story or the collection). but i liked the ravens and other birds, and their flight to freedom, and their route across the landscape and it's history 🙂🦅
💚 i always appreciate tales set very much within the natural landscape, and older folktale traditions, of the British Isles 🙂
🌈 the illustrations were quite nice, some especially so 🙂 and i liked that they were by a stained glass artist/an artist working in stained glass 🙂
tho i think the book focussed on looking nice as much/more than being a good read. it reminded me of 'The Lost Words' and 'The Lost Spells', by Robert Macfarlane (illustrated by Jackie Morris), which i also found underwhelming (tho Jackie Morris's pictures were good 🙂).
🌟 🌟 .5 ?
accessed as a physical hardcover book, published by Unbound in 2025.