Thank you very much to Flatiron Books for sending me a free copy of this book to review.
2.5/5 stars
This book took me on a journey. At first, I thought I would be rating it three stars. I thought the premise was interesting - the last zoo in the world in the middle of a dystopian blight - but a lot of it fell flat. It had the potential to be fascinating, but there wasn't enough worldbuilding to get me really engaged in it. I wanted to know more about the blight - what was happening in the world? Did the government fall in a traditional post-apocalyptic book? Or did things happen as normal? We get glimpses of this throughout, but the narrative is mostly confined to the zoo at Alcatraz. This led to the lens of the novel ultimately feeling very narrow.
Around the 75% mark, I started getting annoyed with the characters. Up until this part, I mostly felt neutral toward them. When one of the main characters, Sailor, started telling Camille, the main character, about something that is SO OBVIOUSLY FAKE and is basically just manipulating her, but Camille eats it up anyway. I was SO annoyed - like girl, read the room! This is not convincing in the slightest! I get wanting to believe in the lie but c'mon. This continued for the rest of the novel.
And the ending. . .I mean, props to the author for ending it with a twist that I did not predict happening, but god, it is depressing. The above blurb says that this book is "propulsive and fiercely hopeful. . .an elegy for a disappearing world and a gorgeous vision for the future," but I disagree with that. I didn't feel any of that hope whatsoever. Instead, I ended the book feeling more depressed than when I started it! What good came out of the ending? It's vague enough, too, that there is the possibility of an open-ended ambiguity, but it's certainly not hopeful, in my opinion.
Finally, I think this book muddles the waters in the conversation between AZA-accredited zoos, wildlife sanctuaries, conservation centers, etc. and bad zoos. The book takes place in a dystopian future and the conditions in the zoo featured in the book are not always the best. That, in combination with one of the main characters being more on the radical side of the debate (all zoos are bad, animals deserve to be free), presents a not great image of zoos when taken out of context. The thing is -- in the current day, no blight or dystopia, there are good zoos and bad zoos. I think the author would agree with this statement, but it's a bit blurry in the book. This is just a reminder to check to see if your local zoo or wildlife center is AZA-accredited before visiting!