I don’t know why I subjected myself to this. I saw it at the thrift store and went for it. I welcome open and honest debate about theological subjects, it’s a great way to grow and learn. I also like to read from both sides of an issue in order to hear something straight from the horses mouth. However, Dr. Rice presented so many straw men, I literally don’t even know where to begin.
1. He places all Calvinists within a hyper-Calvinist, Double-Predestination, equal ultimacy camp. He constantly uses the terms Calvinist and hyper Calvinist interchangeably.
2. He tries to make the argument that most Christians aren’t Calvinists. Who cares. That has nothing to do with the theological merits of a system.
3. He states that most Calvinist terms aren’t in the Bible. This is the same argument that the cults use when trying to debunk the Trinity.
4. He says that Calvinists aren’t soul winners. I guess he never heard of Judson, Carey, Bunyan, Edwards, Whitefield, Rice, Brainerd, Spurgeon, etc. etc. He even quoted Hokesema out of context to try and prove this point.
5. He tried to make Whitefield and Spurgeon out like they Weren’t really Calvinist. Spurgeon, uno the guy that said that “Calvinism is the Gospel.” Also he actually mentioned William Carey fighting with Hyper-Calvinists and yet failed to mention that Carey himself was a staunch Calvinist.
6. He stated that because of Predestination, Calvinists believe that people can be saved apart from hearing the Gospel. That’s ludicrous. There’s a reason why he didn’t offer any quotes to prove this.
7. He did not make any serious attempt to deal with any of the texts that Calvinists use to support their claims. He really only dealt with Romans 9 and that was only a couple of paragraphs. It’s amazing how even good men suddenly become Jehovah’s Witnesses with their proof texting and refusal to walk through certain texts of scripture line upon line. When you refuse to deal with your opponents greatest arguments, it makes your position look really weak.
8. He tried to act like Baptists have never historically been Calvinists , and that’s just patently false.
I could go on and on and on. I’ve never seen such a dishonest theology book. I am convinced that men like John R Rice have as much to do with the resurgence of Calvinism in the Baptist Church as men like Spurgeon. They present the opposing position as such a ridiculous boogeyman that if any of their young preacher boys ever actually read after Spurgeon, Edwards, Sproul or JMac, they will immediately realize that they have been lied to. If the SLP wants to stop producing Calvinists among their ranks they need to stop publishing books like this one.