Mission 2026: Binge reviewing all previous Reads, I was too slothful to appraise, back when I read them
This book reads like an advanced chess problem written in impeccable prose. Every move is legal, elegant, and devastatingly precise. GPSG announces itself as reasonable, restrained, and even modest—while quietly performing an intellectual coup.
It wants to prove that you can have generative power without transformational theatrics.
I remember being impressed and emotionally unmoved. This is a theory that respects rules more than readers. Its formal beauty is undeniable, but it does not linger.
Once understood, it closes itself like a solved equation. There is little excess, little anxiety, and little doubt.
What struck me retrospectively was how ideological its restraint actually is.
GPSG is a protest book masquerading as a manual. It argues against movement not by shouting, but by demonstrating irrelevance. That quiet confidence is admirable—and chilling.
Reading it felt like being corrected by someone who never raises their voice.
I learned a great deal, but I did not feel addressed as a thinking, doubting subject.
This book speaks to the intellect, not the self. It is syntax without confession.