Technically I think my review is "spoilery", so I'd advise not reading it if you want to read the book without influence from my opinion. I do not consider myself an authority in anything, and this review is simply my incoherent rants about things that made me upset, for my own reference. It's also pretty long.
Anyway.
This book made me really, really, really fucking angry.
Don't get me wrong, I understand what Dr. Jay's purpose for writing this was: trying to empower twentysomethings and help them realize that the decisions they make now effect them for the rest of their lives. Not every aspect of this book was rage-inducing; in fact, I quite enjoyed the segment on Facebook, and how what young people present on the site is an amplified, superficial version of their actual lives. I also enjoyed some of the advice concerning work & careers - even in your twenties, if you have a specific profession you are aiming for, it is important to formulate goals and move forwards. While I don't especially agree with Jay's assertion about part-time jobs such as retail or barista work being detrimental on a resume (honestly, I think future employers would be much more accepting of a job at Starbucks than a year of unemployment), I CAN agree that getting part-time work related to your selected field (even if it is temping or freelance) helps with focus and develops your knowledge of said field. I can even see the usefulness in the networking advice she provides. The two stars attributed in my review are for these good portions of the book.
However... There were many aspects of The Defining Decade that rubbed me the wrong way and straight into disgust. Here are some of my biggest bones to pick:
1. Jay's "clients" that she uses as examples throughout the book are predictably selfish, stupid, and vapid to the point it almost seems TOO formulaic. Being 22, I am fully aware of how juvenile and present-orientated my age group can be, but it would be wrong to say that we all suffer from some stupid hangup, which this book seems to suggest: there aren't any examples provided without the intention of causing the reader to shake their head a la "What an idiot, they have no perception of how the world works." Yes, we are young. Yes, some of us make terrible choices. But I refuse to believe that everyone is as clueless as the clients in this book. Even though this book uses words like "likely", "usually", and "possibly", this book doesn't characterize twentysomethings in a good light whatsoever. I think it's a real shame.
2. Going along with that, the examples she uses all fit the same boring mold - these people are young, attractive, and have SO. MUCH. POTENTIAL iftheycouldonlyseetheerroroftheirways! D:
Lol.
I'm sorry, but there are plenty of twentysomethings, and thirtysomethings and fortysomethings... out there who will always work at Starbucks, or fast food, or jobs that this book characteristics as "unfulfilling". Not everyone has huge goals, or... Wait... Wait for it... the resources, family situation, or talent to achieve huge goals. There are plenty of young people who want to be actresses/actors, and have been dreaming about it since they were children, and have no talent in acting. Or they can't afford to drop everything to move to Los Angeles and actively pursue that dream. The book brings up these examples of people who work in dead-end jobs because they want to. Uh, what. Let's get real. Not everyone is going to reach their full "potential". It's horrible, and I hate it, and if I personally could guarantee success for everyone in this world I would. And maybe, just maybe, people are working at Starbucks because they desperately need the money and there isn't anything else available, not because they're "hiding" from something.
I can understand why Jay chose these particular clients, because they are inspirational and help readers who are unsure where to start. But I found myself giggling and yawning every time I read: "I wish I could go to grad school but I've taken too much time off!" said the forlorn twenty five year old waiting tables instead of having a real job. But little did she know that within a year she'd be halfway through her program at Brown.
HOW IS THIS REAL LIFE. I DON'T REMEMBER GETTING INTO GRAD SCHOOL BEING A WALK IN THE PARK. OR THAT EVERYONE IS EASILY OFFERED AN AMAZING JOB BY WORKING HARD.
Oh, and did I mention that everyone in this book is straight (or at least implied to be)? She mentions gay couples in the fertility section briefly, but the relationship conflicts in this novel are exclusively heterosexual.
3. The fertility bit. Oh yes. That thing.
Like, maybe some people out there never made decisions about having children because they thought they'd never meet anyone. (Yes, this is an actual belief that people hold.) Wow, by the time they actually "married", it was too late to have children. Are they still at fault?
Or maybe, some people want to wait until they meet their spouse before they make the decision - some people are simply NOT parent material. You can love someone, and be aware that the person that you love wouldn't be the best parent. I don't think this is a stupid reason to delay making a decision on children.
(oh, by the way, Dr. Jay, I can't have children at all. I'm 22, and I have a nonexistent uterine lining, through no fault of my own. So I fail to see how your preaching can be applied to everyone, that we all need to "hurry up and make some babies!" There are countless women with PCOS and other diseases who can't have children at all, even if they'd like to. Age is NOT the only factor for infertility, and from reading this book, you'd think it was the main reason.)
4. The story about the client Danielle bothered me. From Dr. Jay's descriptions of her panicking and obsession with control, it seemed pretty obvious to me that Danielle may have some form of anxiety disorder. Especially when Danielle herself mentioned the same emotional upheaval and instability in regards to an old ex-boyfriend. People with anxiety disorder have... A medical disorder? I mean, if Danielle is expressing the same worrying and fears on two different aspects of her life, i think it might go a bit further than: "Danielle was a worrier, but learned to put down her roots." People with anxiety may require lifelong medication and therapy, because they simply interpret information differently. I don't think Danielle was choosing to worry - from the description, it sounded like her fears were invasive and obsessive. Those invasive thoughts will probably return again, several times over the course of a person's life. I don't think that combating anxiety, or other emotional disorders, is as easy as acquiring a new worldview. Brain chemistry can play a big part.
Tl;dr While this book is certainly well-intentioned, while reading I find several messages that are being sent to the twentysomething set are problematic, and in some cases, do not address the variety of factors that can influence the actions and thoughts people make and have.