An implausibly wealthy prat is intrigued by a priggish scholarship student, because she isn’t a sl***y prostitute like all the other girls he knows. He still treats her terribly though.
The crux of what makes this book shockingly bad is the author’s failure to decide, or possibly even distinguish, between writing either a realistic portrayal of teenage sexuality or a junior version of an angsty billionaire romance. The problem is not that we have two extremely emotionally immature leads in a superficial relationship - James runs hot and cold and pretends not to know uptight Ruby when his obnoxious friends are around - because obviously that is not an unknown dynamic, and could be a worthwhile subject for a serious and sensitive YA novel. The problem is that this awful not-quite-relationship is portrayed as deeply romantic and meaningful.
Plenty of other self-hating misogynistic tropes from women’s fiction make it into the book.
- Ruby is a girl not like all those other girls, who want James for his money and degrade themselves by gawking at him. Ruby is above such things, at one point rejecting a staggering bribe he offers her(1) and thus winning his interest.
- James’ supposedly romantic gestures are almost entirely correlated with being wealthy - he gives her lifts in his family’s chauffeur driven limousine, he takes her to a party in an opulent mansion, he gives her an expensive bag (made by his family’s business) and he loans her a priceless dress from his family’s collection(2). We are told (certainly not shown) that he has scintillating discussions about current affairs with her, but the only actually romantic thing he does that doesn’t consist of being filthy rich is rescue her from drowning in a pool and carrying her off in his muscular arms, Ruby conveniently having a phobia (3) that has made her physically helpless to save herself.
- Ruby is a priggish judgemental virgin and that makes her a worthy heroine. All the other girls James has slept with are worthless sluts who deserve being emotionally irrelevant to him.
- We are told Ruby is smart because she works very hard and fetishises timetables and organisation; James on the other hand coasts by on natural intellect and in the first meeting of her precious events committee effortlessly comes up with better and more creative ideas than her. We are assured the pair have off-stage conversations and that they are really deep and intelligent, but Ruby can't muster an intelligent insight in her POV to save herself. James, despite being emotionally damaged and constantly behaving like a ****wit, is a lot more self-aware.
- Probably worst of all, in a sub-plot involving a teacher sleeping with one of Ruby’s classmates in an affair that began when she was 15(4), it becomes apparent the author really is suggesting that the student is somehow the seductress. Because this occurred in a YA book written in the 21st Century I kept on waiting for some understanding that the teacher is acting immorally; instead, we find out this is real love and has rescued the girl from sleeping around.
In terms of gender relations the whole novel is old school reactionary brain-rot.
There’s plenty more to rant about. The author apparently has no idea how education or the class system works in England. The physical model for Maxton Hall is apparently Fettes College, ie. a school that is actually in Scotland, which may explain why this most prestigious secondary school in England is co-ed and has a rector rather than a principal. That is a quibble, but in not understanding that English schools are not quite the same as Scottish schools, the author shows her lack of understanding of her setting(5).
When it comes to the cultural life of the school, Kasten is apparently drawing from deliberately heightened US high school dramas, where the students are ostentatiously wealthy, democratically fashionable, throw elaborate parties on campus, drive cars to school, and of course are co-educational day students. She has the “rector” of a posh English school require his students to organise parties for their teenage classmates, random alumni and parents, at which alcohol is served and drunkenness amongst the students overlooked to the point of tacit encouragement. Yes, English culture is pretty tolerant of surreptitious youth drinking but I can’t imagine a school, let alone the most famous and prestigious school in England, forcing children into an official situation practically designed to embarrass them in front of adults and encourage harassment. And then as part of a prank, strippers come to the school… yes, someone hires strippers who coerce a minor into a lap dance because apparently in this world the strippers' booking agency didn’t bat an eyelid at a request to go a high school, they weren’t phased by their audience being suspiciously young once they got there, and they aren’t afraid of harassing clearly unwilling underage participants. You get the picture. Almost everything that happens in this book is completely ridiculous which might be fun if the book wasn’t also practically humourless and convinced of the timeless depth of the central romance.
There are some positive things to say, beyond that it made a wonderful book club book because there was so much to pick at. There are many potentially interesting minor characters and sub-plots that don’t get much airing here but might be developed in the sequels. The characterisation of Ruby and James could be interesting in a book that wasn’t invested in them as romantic heroes. The first few chapters are substantially better written than the rest; the chapter introducing Ruby’s family has some particularly lovely scene-setting. I don’t know what pressures meant the author couldn’t sustain that level of writing. It’s quite possible she wrote a more commercially successful book by abandoning a better one.
(1)James, a child whose only source of money is his obnoxious and controlling parents, has apparently ready access to a sum greater than the average annual UK income to bribe his fellow students with. Even billionaires might blink about letting their kids run around with enough cash to buy a sports car stuffed in their pockets.
(2)Ruby wears this precious 150 year old dress to a school party, after it is altered to fit her. ****ing barbarians.
(3)Realistic characters have phobias and vulnerabilities, and I would be fine with a phobia plot line if we were reading a realist YA novel. This particular vulnerability however, feels very much as though it was constructed to leave Ruby a helpless damsel in need of rescue.
(4)Yes, that is below the legal age of consent in the UK. It is a crime for teachers to sleep with students under 18 in any case.
(5)I don’t expect a ton of research in a piece of fluff, but I think the author has no feel for her setting at all. The thing that really confirmed this was the section where James and Ruby go for their Oxford interviews, because the author clearly had researched this bit, probably even visited Oxford and crammed in copious tedious details of the process and buildings, while still getting the flavour completely wrong. For example, there are many lovely historic pubs in Oxford of great historical significance such as the one that plays a role in the book. However the Oxford colleges would never organise official beer-heavy admissions events in them, because they are tiny and divided into tiny little rooms, because most of the students invited would be still 17 and not legally allowed to purchase beer, and because they aren’t sadists who are trying to get a lot of nervous kids sloshed before some of the most important interviews of their lives.