Ghosts of a Family reads less like a narrative history and more like a disjointed database. Much like the Sutton Index of Deaths, it provides a litany of names, statuses, and responsibilities, but it utterly fails to "unravel" the complex motivations behind the McMahon murders.
The timeline is severely muddled by the interchangeable use of the RIC and RUC, and the prose lacks the coherence required to navigate the inter-communal violence of the 1920s. When Burke finally proffers a suspect, the delivery is clumsy and rushed, leaping across time and space in a way that feels unearned. It’s a semi-reliable resource for charting casualties, but as a serious historical examination, it misses the mark.