What do you think?
Rate this book
The Cybernetic Society: How Humans and Machines Will Shape the Future Together
"An optimistic, shimmering image of a world where AI operates in service to humankind" (Kirkus) argues that both the major risk and opportunity of AI is that humans and computers have fused, giving AI the ability to shape the future of human affairs
Artificial intelligence is at home, at work, in politics, and on the battlefield.
In The Cybernetic Society, technologist Amir Husain argues that AI hasn’t simply encroached on everything we do. It has become part of us, and we, it. Humans and intelligent machines, he argues, are enmeshed in a symbiotic hybrid that he calls a “cybernetic society.” Husain describes a present and future where AI isn’t a tool of humans but our equal partner, one where they can realize their own visions of the world. There is great potential and Saudi Arabia’s Neom—a “cognitive city” being built in inhospitable desert—shows how this symbiosis can make life possible where otherwise, it is not. But the profusion of intelligent military drones is making mass destruction possible where otherwise, it is not.
As engrossing as it is urgent, The Cybernetic Society offers a new understanding of this revolutionary fusion of machine and mankind, and its profound implications for all our futures. The path ahead is challenging. But Husain shows why we can live harmoniously with our creations.
Artificial intelligence is at home, at work, in politics, and on the battlefield.
In The Cybernetic Society, technologist Amir Husain argues that AI hasn’t simply encroached on everything we do. It has become part of us, and we, it. Humans and intelligent machines, he argues, are enmeshed in a symbiotic hybrid that he calls a “cybernetic society.” Husain describes a present and future where AI isn’t a tool of humans but our equal partner, one where they can realize their own visions of the world. There is great potential and Saudi Arabia’s Neom—a “cognitive city” being built in inhospitable desert—shows how this symbiosis can make life possible where otherwise, it is not. But the profusion of intelligent military drones is making mass destruction possible where otherwise, it is not.
As engrossing as it is urgent, The Cybernetic Society offers a new understanding of this revolutionary fusion of machine and mankind, and its profound implications for all our futures. The path ahead is challenging. But Husain shows why we can live harmoniously with our creations.
272 pages, Hardcover
Published August 5, 2025
8 people are currently reading
79 people want to read
About the author
Amir Husain
6 books24 followersAmir Husain is an award-winning serial entrepreneur and inventor based in Austin, Texas. He is the founder and CEO of SparkCognition, Inc., a company specializing in cognitive computing software solutions that help businesses and governments better respond to a world of ever-evolving threats, and he was a founding member of IBM's advisory board for Watson. Husain speaks at numerous SXSW, defense, cybersecurity, computer science, energy, and environmental conferences. His work, along with SparkCognition's work, has been featured in such publications as Fast Company, Wired, Forbes, and the New York Times. The Sentient Machine is his first book.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
Read
October 14, 2025"The Cybernetic Society: How Humans and Machines Will Shape the Future Together" by Amir Husain is a thought-provoking exploration of how our world is evolving through the fusion of human intention and machine intelligence. Husain proposes that the driving force behind the twenty-first century is not politics, biology, or economics, but code itself - the invisible infrastructure through which decisions, movements, and ideas are now shaped. In this view, the digital realm is not a separate domain but an extension of human consciousness, binding us into what he calls a 'cybernetic society.' This new condition, where feedback between humans and machines governs nearly every aspect of life, represents a profound shift in how we define freedom, power, and identity.
The concept of cybernetics, first articulated by Norbert Wiener in the mid-twentieth century, sought to describe the feedback loops that link humans, machines, and systems of communication. What began as an abstract scientific theory has now matured into a lived reality. In this cybernetic society, signals no longer remain confined to digital space but fold back into the physical world, creating loops of influence that alter behavior and outcomes. Finance, politics, and culture are all affected. A single algorithm can move stock markets, while a viral post can reshape public sentiment overnight. Our devices constantly gather data, react to it, and modify our environment, producing a self-reinforcing cycle where human intention and machine feedback continuously shape one another.
This reflexivity means that small actions can trigger vast consequences, particularly because technological change unfolds exponentially. Innovations often seem to appear suddenly after long periods of gradual buildup. Neural networks, for instance, existed for decades as theoretical curiosities before exploding into mainstream applications once computational power and data reached critical mass. Similar dynamics drive the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, automation, and interconnected infrastructures. The systems surrounding us behave less like static machines and more like living organisms - sensing, learning, and evolving through constant feedback. Cities and corporations alike are transforming into adaptive entities governed by streams of information.
One striking example is Neom, Saudi Arabia’s planned 'cognitive city,' which embodies the cybernetic vision. It is designed to sense and respond to residents through real-time AI-driven adjustments in transport, energy, and governance. This ambition highlights both the promise and the peril of cybernetics: the same systems that enable efficiency and responsiveness can also entrench surveillance and control. As Husain warns, feedback loops can either empower individuals and institutions or reduce them to cogs within opaque, self-reinforcing structures. The difference lies in how these systems are designed and governed - whether they remain transparent and accountable or become closed, coercive, and unexplainable.
Power in the cybernetic age increasingly resides not in physical assets but in cloud infrastructures. Companies like Amazon exemplify this shift, blending vast human workforces with armies of robots and algorithms that make employment and logistics decisions automatically. These platforms provide essential computational backbones for governments and businesses alike, giving them unprecedented influence over economies and communication networks. Such dominance creates what Husain calls 'path lock-in': once a massive system is built, it becomes nearly impossible to alter its course. Like the Iridium satellite network before it, these projects become too big to pivot, locking society into specific technological and political trajectories. The infrastructures of the cybernetic age are thus deeply political - they determine who controls data, who benefits from innovation, and whether power remains centralized or is distributed across the population.
The cybernetic condition also extends into the human body. Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) now translate neural activity into movement or speech, bridging biology and computation in unprecedented ways. Companies like Neuralink and Paradromics are developing implants that may one day allow thought-controlled communication or mobility restoration for the disabled. Yet these advances bring profound ethical and social dilemmas: who gets access, who owns the data flowing from the brain, and what risks come with merging mind and machine? Beyond neural links, physical augmentations such as robotic exoskeletons already enhance strength and endurance for soldiers and workers, blurring the line between natural and artificial capability.
These developments reach their most extreme form on the battlefield, where human–machine feedback collapses the time needed for decisions. Swarms of autonomous drones now operate with minimal oversight, executing tasks at machine speed. In ongoing conflicts, thousands of unmanned systems perform surveillance, target strikes, and logistical support, demonstrating how cybernetic warfare is no longer theoretical. While defense departments outline ethical principles for responsible AI use, the momentum toward automation continues, compressing human decision-making into algorithmic loops. The same feedback principles that adapt an educational program to a student’s brainwaves also guide machines that identify and attack enemies, revealing both the versatility and danger of cybernetics when applied to conflict.
Husain situates these transformations within a broader historical and sociological framework. Drawing on cliodynamics - a discipline founded by Peter Turchin that uses data to detect recurring patterns in history - he argues that social instability follows predictable cycles of inequality, elite competition, and resource stress. Technology, rather than smoothing these oscillations, accelerates them. By enabling the mass production of educated elites while concentrating wealth and control in the hands of a few, cybernetic systems deepen the very inequalities that lead to unrest. Turchin’s Political Stress Index measures these pressures, suggesting that societies like the United States are entering phases of turbulence reminiscent of earlier civilizational declines. In this light, cybernetics is not just a technological phenomenon but a historical force amplifying long-standing human dynamics.
At the same time, Husain emphasizes that privacy - once a buffer against power - has effectively vanished. The cybernetic web of sensors, cameras, and data systems has rendered opting out nearly impossible. Our phones, cars, and smart homes continuously transmit information, while cloud servers preserve digital traces long after users believe they’ve been erased. Even analog tools leak signals; researchers can now reconstruct typed words from the sound of keystrokes. Laws like the EU’s GDPR have failed to shift the balance of power because they operate within systems designed to collect data by default. The result is a condition of permanent exposure: every movement, preference, and connection feeds into an ecosystem optimized for prediction and control.
Despite this bleak outlook, "The Cybernetic Society" does not conclude in despair. Husain turns his attention to what he calls 'technologies of freedom' - emerging tools and movements that decentralize control and return agency to individuals and communities. These include projects like Solid, proposed by web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, which allows users to store personal data in private pods and decide who can access it. Community mesh networks such as NYC Mesh demonstrate how local groups can build their own internet infrastructure, bypassing corporate providers and enhancing resilience. Similarly, self-hosted platforms like Nextcloud give people direct control over their communication and storage.
New paradigms of artificial intelligence offer further possibilities. Federated learning allows devices to train AI models locally while keeping raw data private, already implemented in systems like Google’s keyboard app. Meanwhile, researchers are developing quantum-safe encryption algorithms - Kyber, Dilithium, and SPHINCS+ - to secure communication in an era when quantum computers could otherwise break existing cryptography. Decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials let users prove their identities without central authorities, and blockchain-based autonomous organizations allow communities to govern projects collectively and transparently. Even in energy and environmental management, cybernetic thinking can empower citizens: initiatives like the Brooklyn Microgrid and Pakistan’s MinusFifteen Project demonstrate how local feedback systems can drive sustainable change from the ground up.
Husain’s message is clear - the feedback loops that define the cybernetic age can be designed for liberation rather than domination. Whether through decentralized infrastructure, data ownership, or participatory governance, humans still have the capacity to shape how machines extend their agency. But this requires not only technology, but literacy, ethics, and vigilance. As societies become more interwoven with artificial systems, the challenge is to preserve autonomy and accountability within that fusion.
In conclusion, "The Cybernetic Society: How Humans and Machines Will Shape the Future Together" paints a portrait of a world in transition - one where the boundaries between human and machine, biology and computation, are dissolving. Amir Husain shows that feedback, the central mechanism of cybernetics, governs not only our technologies but our institutions, economies, and selves. The same logic that drives innovation can just as easily entrench inequality or erode freedom. Yet the future remains open. If societies choose to design technologies that enhance transparency, decentralization, and collective agency, the cybernetic age could usher in new forms of empowerment. If not, it may solidify into systems of control as opaque as they are efficient. Husain’s work ultimately challenges readers to recognize that the future of human-machine fusion will not be determined by code alone, but by the moral and political choices embedded within it.
The concept of cybernetics, first articulated by Norbert Wiener in the mid-twentieth century, sought to describe the feedback loops that link humans, machines, and systems of communication. What began as an abstract scientific theory has now matured into a lived reality. In this cybernetic society, signals no longer remain confined to digital space but fold back into the physical world, creating loops of influence that alter behavior and outcomes. Finance, politics, and culture are all affected. A single algorithm can move stock markets, while a viral post can reshape public sentiment overnight. Our devices constantly gather data, react to it, and modify our environment, producing a self-reinforcing cycle where human intention and machine feedback continuously shape one another.
This reflexivity means that small actions can trigger vast consequences, particularly because technological change unfolds exponentially. Innovations often seem to appear suddenly after long periods of gradual buildup. Neural networks, for instance, existed for decades as theoretical curiosities before exploding into mainstream applications once computational power and data reached critical mass. Similar dynamics drive the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, automation, and interconnected infrastructures. The systems surrounding us behave less like static machines and more like living organisms - sensing, learning, and evolving through constant feedback. Cities and corporations alike are transforming into adaptive entities governed by streams of information.
One striking example is Neom, Saudi Arabia’s planned 'cognitive city,' which embodies the cybernetic vision. It is designed to sense and respond to residents through real-time AI-driven adjustments in transport, energy, and governance. This ambition highlights both the promise and the peril of cybernetics: the same systems that enable efficiency and responsiveness can also entrench surveillance and control. As Husain warns, feedback loops can either empower individuals and institutions or reduce them to cogs within opaque, self-reinforcing structures. The difference lies in how these systems are designed and governed - whether they remain transparent and accountable or become closed, coercive, and unexplainable.
Power in the cybernetic age increasingly resides not in physical assets but in cloud infrastructures. Companies like Amazon exemplify this shift, blending vast human workforces with armies of robots and algorithms that make employment and logistics decisions automatically. These platforms provide essential computational backbones for governments and businesses alike, giving them unprecedented influence over economies and communication networks. Such dominance creates what Husain calls 'path lock-in': once a massive system is built, it becomes nearly impossible to alter its course. Like the Iridium satellite network before it, these projects become too big to pivot, locking society into specific technological and political trajectories. The infrastructures of the cybernetic age are thus deeply political - they determine who controls data, who benefits from innovation, and whether power remains centralized or is distributed across the population.
The cybernetic condition also extends into the human body. Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) now translate neural activity into movement or speech, bridging biology and computation in unprecedented ways. Companies like Neuralink and Paradromics are developing implants that may one day allow thought-controlled communication or mobility restoration for the disabled. Yet these advances bring profound ethical and social dilemmas: who gets access, who owns the data flowing from the brain, and what risks come with merging mind and machine? Beyond neural links, physical augmentations such as robotic exoskeletons already enhance strength and endurance for soldiers and workers, blurring the line between natural and artificial capability.
These developments reach their most extreme form on the battlefield, where human–machine feedback collapses the time needed for decisions. Swarms of autonomous drones now operate with minimal oversight, executing tasks at machine speed. In ongoing conflicts, thousands of unmanned systems perform surveillance, target strikes, and logistical support, demonstrating how cybernetic warfare is no longer theoretical. While defense departments outline ethical principles for responsible AI use, the momentum toward automation continues, compressing human decision-making into algorithmic loops. The same feedback principles that adapt an educational program to a student’s brainwaves also guide machines that identify and attack enemies, revealing both the versatility and danger of cybernetics when applied to conflict.
Husain situates these transformations within a broader historical and sociological framework. Drawing on cliodynamics - a discipline founded by Peter Turchin that uses data to detect recurring patterns in history - he argues that social instability follows predictable cycles of inequality, elite competition, and resource stress. Technology, rather than smoothing these oscillations, accelerates them. By enabling the mass production of educated elites while concentrating wealth and control in the hands of a few, cybernetic systems deepen the very inequalities that lead to unrest. Turchin’s Political Stress Index measures these pressures, suggesting that societies like the United States are entering phases of turbulence reminiscent of earlier civilizational declines. In this light, cybernetics is not just a technological phenomenon but a historical force amplifying long-standing human dynamics.
At the same time, Husain emphasizes that privacy - once a buffer against power - has effectively vanished. The cybernetic web of sensors, cameras, and data systems has rendered opting out nearly impossible. Our phones, cars, and smart homes continuously transmit information, while cloud servers preserve digital traces long after users believe they’ve been erased. Even analog tools leak signals; researchers can now reconstruct typed words from the sound of keystrokes. Laws like the EU’s GDPR have failed to shift the balance of power because they operate within systems designed to collect data by default. The result is a condition of permanent exposure: every movement, preference, and connection feeds into an ecosystem optimized for prediction and control.
Despite this bleak outlook, "The Cybernetic Society" does not conclude in despair. Husain turns his attention to what he calls 'technologies of freedom' - emerging tools and movements that decentralize control and return agency to individuals and communities. These include projects like Solid, proposed by web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, which allows users to store personal data in private pods and decide who can access it. Community mesh networks such as NYC Mesh demonstrate how local groups can build their own internet infrastructure, bypassing corporate providers and enhancing resilience. Similarly, self-hosted platforms like Nextcloud give people direct control over their communication and storage.
New paradigms of artificial intelligence offer further possibilities. Federated learning allows devices to train AI models locally while keeping raw data private, already implemented in systems like Google’s keyboard app. Meanwhile, researchers are developing quantum-safe encryption algorithms - Kyber, Dilithium, and SPHINCS+ - to secure communication in an era when quantum computers could otherwise break existing cryptography. Decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials let users prove their identities without central authorities, and blockchain-based autonomous organizations allow communities to govern projects collectively and transparently. Even in energy and environmental management, cybernetic thinking can empower citizens: initiatives like the Brooklyn Microgrid and Pakistan’s MinusFifteen Project demonstrate how local feedback systems can drive sustainable change from the ground up.
Husain’s message is clear - the feedback loops that define the cybernetic age can be designed for liberation rather than domination. Whether through decentralized infrastructure, data ownership, or participatory governance, humans still have the capacity to shape how machines extend their agency. But this requires not only technology, but literacy, ethics, and vigilance. As societies become more interwoven with artificial systems, the challenge is to preserve autonomy and accountability within that fusion.
In conclusion, "The Cybernetic Society: How Humans and Machines Will Shape the Future Together" paints a portrait of a world in transition - one where the boundaries between human and machine, biology and computation, are dissolving. Amir Husain shows that feedback, the central mechanism of cybernetics, governs not only our technologies but our institutions, economies, and selves. The same logic that drives innovation can just as easily entrench inequality or erode freedom. Yet the future remains open. If societies choose to design technologies that enhance transparency, decentralization, and collective agency, the cybernetic age could usher in new forms of empowerment. If not, it may solidify into systems of control as opaque as they are efficient. Husain’s work ultimately challenges readers to recognize that the future of human-machine fusion will not be determined by code alone, but by the moral and political choices embedded within it.
September 14, 2025
Um mundo onde pessoas e dispositivos eletrônicos estão completamente integrados, em um nível que hoje parece fantasioso, fantástico ou temerário dependendo da sua visão. Essa é a ideia por trás deste livro. A ideia de Husain de olhar para frente, de fazer um exercício de futurologia, não é fácil, e me lembra o livro de Alec Ross de alguns anos atrás. Ross fez um ótimo livro, assim como Husain, com um olhar positivo sobre o futuro, combinando imaginação, realidade e fantasia. Esse é o tipo de texto no qual o autor vai errar em muitos pontos e acertar em diversos outros. É impossível acertar em tudo, mas também é altamente improvável errar por completo. E esse é o maior mérito de Ross e Husain: olhar para frente e criar um texto que poderá, dentro de 10 anos, ser lido novamente para ver o que efetivamente aconteceu.
Muitos críticos não gostam do texto de Husain por diversas razões. Mas para mim são os mesmos críticos que, 20 anos atrás, não iriam imaginar o que temos hoje e como é maravilhoso estar vivo hoje. Substituir o jornal impresso pela tela do celular, a tela da TV pela tela do celular, substituir o mapa impresso pela tela do celular, substituir a agenda física pela tela do celular, substituir o livro físico pela tela do... Kindle? Tudo isso é não apenas fantástico como permitiu a humanidade entrar numa nova fase de acesso global. Quantas pessoas podiam, 30 anos atrás, ler o jornal de outro país tal qual os leitores no estrangeiro? Quantas pessoas podiam, 30 anos atrás, ter sua agenda de compromissos em uma planilha eletrônica? Luxos que em 1980 eram para muitos poucos, caros demais para a maioria, hoje estão aí por preços super competitivos. Mas falar isso em 1980 seria ofensivo para alguns críticos de jornal? Possivelmente. Felizmente pessoas como Husain não se importam e colocam isso no papel.
Husain fez um livro interessante mas não sem falhas. O foco muda rapidamente de um tema para o outro, as referências são confusas e raras. Existe inclusive uma falha grave quando o texto fala sobre o Waze: que já foi adquirido pelo Google. Esperava mais em um livro lançado em 2025. E esse erro me assusta: quais outros pontos do livro também estão errados? Que outras referências estão equivocadas? Um texto mais científico, apontando claramente a origem das informações e tendo rastreabilidade seria legal.
Seja como for, o texto de Husain é um interessante passeio por um futuro que pode ser construído se assim a sociedade decidir. A IA vai substituir muitas tarefas feitas por humanos hoje? Sem dúvida! Como o automóvel substituiu muitos empregos ligados ao transporte a cavalos, como internet substituiu tantas profissões. Mas isso não precisa ser ruim ou trágico. Criar um mundo melhor onde a IA esteja integrada ao humano pode ser realmente viável e benéfico, se assim for decidido. Escrever sobre o futuro não é estar certo ou errado, é ter imaginação, deixar o texto fluir e colocar o leitor para pensar. Se o leitor ama ou odeia suas previsões isso não é importante, pois ainda existe tempo de mudar e corrigir o rumo - só não existe como impedir que o avanço continue...
Muitos críticos não gostam do texto de Husain por diversas razões. Mas para mim são os mesmos críticos que, 20 anos atrás, não iriam imaginar o que temos hoje e como é maravilhoso estar vivo hoje. Substituir o jornal impresso pela tela do celular, a tela da TV pela tela do celular, substituir o mapa impresso pela tela do celular, substituir a agenda física pela tela do celular, substituir o livro físico pela tela do... Kindle? Tudo isso é não apenas fantástico como permitiu a humanidade entrar numa nova fase de acesso global. Quantas pessoas podiam, 30 anos atrás, ler o jornal de outro país tal qual os leitores no estrangeiro? Quantas pessoas podiam, 30 anos atrás, ter sua agenda de compromissos em uma planilha eletrônica? Luxos que em 1980 eram para muitos poucos, caros demais para a maioria, hoje estão aí por preços super competitivos. Mas falar isso em 1980 seria ofensivo para alguns críticos de jornal? Possivelmente. Felizmente pessoas como Husain não se importam e colocam isso no papel.
Husain fez um livro interessante mas não sem falhas. O foco muda rapidamente de um tema para o outro, as referências são confusas e raras. Existe inclusive uma falha grave quando o texto fala sobre o Waze: que já foi adquirido pelo Google. Esperava mais em um livro lançado em 2025. E esse erro me assusta: quais outros pontos do livro também estão errados? Que outras referências estão equivocadas? Um texto mais científico, apontando claramente a origem das informações e tendo rastreabilidade seria legal.
Seja como for, o texto de Husain é um interessante passeio por um futuro que pode ser construído se assim a sociedade decidir. A IA vai substituir muitas tarefas feitas por humanos hoje? Sem dúvida! Como o automóvel substituiu muitos empregos ligados ao transporte a cavalos, como internet substituiu tantas profissões. Mas isso não precisa ser ruim ou trágico. Criar um mundo melhor onde a IA esteja integrada ao humano pode ser realmente viável e benéfico, se assim for decidido. Escrever sobre o futuro não é estar certo ou errado, é ter imaginação, deixar o texto fluir e colocar o leitor para pensar. Se o leitor ama ou odeia suas previsões isso não é importante, pois ainda existe tempo de mudar e corrigir o rumo - só não existe como impedir que o avanço continue...
August 4, 2025
What if we learned to live more with machines, integrated in a society where we harness their full powers and capabilities to build a better world? This is what Husain explores in a Cybernetic Society.
He takes us through various parts of society and lists the opportunities, the current projects and future developments. It’s all an interesting society that is being showcased in this book.
Unfortunately, the book soon starts feeling like it’s a list of cool projects and things happening, many of which Husain and his wife are involved in. It gets a little tedious trying to keep up with it all, especially if you’re not super familiar with the world (I am somewhat, but not intimately).
Ultimately, I land in the conclusion that Husain and I probably don’t share the same dream of where the world is heading. I see myself as a tech optimist, I’d like to see creative solutions to problems that seem impossible, like climate change. At the same time, I can’t share the overwhelming joy that a city like Neom (which is hailed many times in the book as a prime example of a cybernetic city) is being built on human rights violations and poor working conditions. We have to treat our people well, no matter how grand the vision.
Problems — legal as well as ethical — are skirted over with a level of ignorance or nonchalance, in a way that doesn’t sit right with me. But if one can ignore that, it’s a pretty exciting read for a sci fi that is not too far away.
Thanks to NetGalley and Basic Books for allowing me to review this book!
He takes us through various parts of society and lists the opportunities, the current projects and future developments. It’s all an interesting society that is being showcased in this book.
Unfortunately, the book soon starts feeling like it’s a list of cool projects and things happening, many of which Husain and his wife are involved in. It gets a little tedious trying to keep up with it all, especially if you’re not super familiar with the world (I am somewhat, but not intimately).
Ultimately, I land in the conclusion that Husain and I probably don’t share the same dream of where the world is heading. I see myself as a tech optimist, I’d like to see creative solutions to problems that seem impossible, like climate change. At the same time, I can’t share the overwhelming joy that a city like Neom (which is hailed many times in the book as a prime example of a cybernetic city) is being built on human rights violations and poor working conditions. We have to treat our people well, no matter how grand the vision.
Problems — legal as well as ethical — are skirted over with a level of ignorance or nonchalance, in a way that doesn’t sit right with me. But if one can ignore that, it’s a pretty exciting read for a sci fi that is not too far away.
Thanks to NetGalley and Basic Books for allowing me to review this book!
October 14, 2025
When I started this book, I was skeptical of the author’s premise that Ai already controls everything in society.
Upon hearing him out, I concede that Husain makes a strong argument that we are definitely heading there. Though we’re still far from AI “controlling”“everything.”
Recommend for those interested how AI is currently being implemented in various aspects of daily life.
Upon hearing him out, I concede that Husain makes a strong argument that we are definitely heading there. Though we’re still far from AI “controlling”“everything.”
Recommend for those interested how AI is currently being implemented in various aspects of daily life.
October 17, 2025
Some good points. Would have liked it more if less time was spent on the obligatory we have to make sure that new tech does not become the new man keeping the normal suspects down.
November 20, 2025
Фантазии о ИИ и будущем.
December 11, 2025
Review to come...
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews