What do you think?
Rate this book
Unequal: The Maths of When Things Do and Don’t Add Up
A NEW SCIENTIST BOOK OF THE YEAR
'Clear, clever and friendly...even at her most whimsical, she is rigorous and insightful' ALEX BELLOS
'Eugenia Cheng has humour, grace and a natural gift' DANIEL LEVITIN
'Playful and deeply serious ... shows how exploring equality in maths may help the real world' NEW SCIENTIST
When we see an equals sign, we usually see something clear problem on one side, solution on the other. We might need to shuffle some things around - balance the equation - to get there, but it's all pretty clear cut...isn't it?
As it turns out, between those parallel lines lies something far more exciting than questions and answers. An equals sign is an invitation to a mathematical playground of choice and abstraction. By opening your mind to different mathematical choices and perspectives, you can unlock far greater insight than you could have dreamed.
Eugenia Cheng explores the rich and rewarding interplay between sameness and difference, and offers us a new way to see the world based on the choices and interpretations we make. A glorious celebration of mathematics, Unequal will change the way you think - in maths, and in life.
'Clear, clever and friendly...even at her most whimsical, she is rigorous and insightful' ALEX BELLOS
'Eugenia Cheng has humour, grace and a natural gift' DANIEL LEVITIN
'Playful and deeply serious ... shows how exploring equality in maths may help the real world' NEW SCIENTIST
When we see an equals sign, we usually see something clear problem on one side, solution on the other. We might need to shuffle some things around - balance the equation - to get there, but it's all pretty clear cut...isn't it?
As it turns out, between those parallel lines lies something far more exciting than questions and answers. An equals sign is an invitation to a mathematical playground of choice and abstraction. By opening your mind to different mathematical choices and perspectives, you can unlock far greater insight than you could have dreamed.
Eugenia Cheng explores the rich and rewarding interplay between sameness and difference, and offers us a new way to see the world based on the choices and interpretations we make. A glorious celebration of mathematics, Unequal will change the way you think - in maths, and in life.
- GenresNonfictionMathematics
392 pages, Kindle Edition
Published June 5, 2025
12 people are currently reading
205 people want to read
About the author
Eugenia Cheng
17 books344 followersEugenia Cheng is a mathematician, pianist, and lecturer. She is passionate about ridding the world of math-phobia. Eugenia’s first book, How to Bake Pi, has been an international success. Molly’s Mathematical Adventure is her first children's book.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
November 2, 2025
For me there is a sweet spot for science and maths books that can best be summed up by Roger Penrose’s Road to Reality. This type of book lies somewhere between an introductory text for undergraduate students and a popular science book that treats readers as able to grasp the necessary maths and physics while still being accessible to a wider audience. I came across Unequal by Eugenia Cheng in my local bookshop a couple of weeks back, and after a short browse revealed that it falls roughly into this category, I decided to give it a go.
Unequal is a dive into the world of category theory in mathematics, which is the area of maths that examines mathematical structures themselves. The author has written a number of books that infuse everyday life with esoteric mathematical concepts – her book on infinity (Beyond Infinity) is one of the best popular maths books I’ve read. However, of late her books have tended to be peppered with illustrations of real-life applications of maths that at times veer into leftist dogma which I think has put off a lot of her readers – including me. While this tendency is to some extent true of Unequal, it tails off towards the end of the book and only rises to the level of irritation in a few places (be prepared for some sweeping statements about white men).
True to its title, Unequal presents its material in a somewhat unequal way – some earlier chapters labour simple points, while later chapters feel a bit rushed, perhaps because Cheng thinks the material is too advanced and anything more than an overview would lose readers. Add to this the tendency of earlier chapters to spend too much time trying to relate concepts from category theory to real life – often unsuccessfully in my view – and I think the book could have been better, hence three stars.
There is one howler in the book that I think should be pointed out. Cheng states (on page 10 of the hardback edition) that road signs painted on road surfaces are elongated as, when they are seen from the perspective of drivers driving at speed, “the surface shrinks in the direction of travel according to how fast they’re moving”. Not true unless Cheng drives near the speed of light!
Unequal is a dive into the world of category theory in mathematics, which is the area of maths that examines mathematical structures themselves. The author has written a number of books that infuse everyday life with esoteric mathematical concepts – her book on infinity (Beyond Infinity) is one of the best popular maths books I’ve read. However, of late her books have tended to be peppered with illustrations of real-life applications of maths that at times veer into leftist dogma which I think has put off a lot of her readers – including me. While this tendency is to some extent true of Unequal, it tails off towards the end of the book and only rises to the level of irritation in a few places (be prepared for some sweeping statements about white men).
True to its title, Unequal presents its material in a somewhat unequal way – some earlier chapters labour simple points, while later chapters feel a bit rushed, perhaps because Cheng thinks the material is too advanced and anything more than an overview would lose readers. Add to this the tendency of earlier chapters to spend too much time trying to relate concepts from category theory to real life – often unsuccessfully in my view – and I think the book could have been better, hence three stars.
There is one howler in the book that I think should be pointed out. Cheng states (on page 10 of the hardback edition) that road signs painted on road surfaces are elongated as, when they are seen from the perspective of drivers driving at speed, “the surface shrinks in the direction of travel according to how fast they’re moving”. Not true unless Cheng drives near the speed of light!
November 23, 2025
This book falls into the vein of 25 Rocks which I read earlier this year. If i was being completely honest with myself, i'll put this in the "didn't finish" category because even after I finish the book, I cannot tell you the main thesis of the book other than what you can see on the front or back cover of the book.
The chapters in this book always begin with a math equation of some sort, and the grand thesis is really that not everything about math has to be about equality which we kind of implicitly assume when we see x + y = z. The book then takes the math equation or concept and then starts broaching real life topics with it, like equality doesn't have to be equal, such as when in a couple, one person prefers to cook and another prefers to clean, it doesn't make sense to force each person to equally clean and cook the same amounts. We deem it equal that they can share chores in a way that's beneficial to all and wave away the inequality that one thing or another takes up more effort.
This is fine for relatively simple concepts, but when she starts talking about harder concepts, it just loses me completely. this was not for a lack of concentration on my part, the authoress, who is also the narrator, acknowledges in parts of the audio book that listeners might just have to live with the fact that they cannot see equations and to check the enclosed pdf if they want to follow along.
I might end up checking out the dead tree version of this book at some point, but simply put, I think this is kind of the "math's version of philosophy", using math concepts to express the authoresses' philosophy. As these books goes, how well you react to it will depend on how your worldview lines up with the authoress. Mine lines up well so I think i put up till the end of the book with it because what she does say about equality in plain english is worth listening to. its maybe a stretch as to how you can use math equations or concepts to justify it, but hey, it takes all sorts.
Worth it if you're into math and want to see how stretchy it really is when it comes to asserting world views. =)
not recommended unless you are really into math.
The chapters in this book always begin with a math equation of some sort, and the grand thesis is really that not everything about math has to be about equality which we kind of implicitly assume when we see x + y = z. The book then takes the math equation or concept and then starts broaching real life topics with it, like equality doesn't have to be equal, such as when in a couple, one person prefers to cook and another prefers to clean, it doesn't make sense to force each person to equally clean and cook the same amounts. We deem it equal that they can share chores in a way that's beneficial to all and wave away the inequality that one thing or another takes up more effort.
This is fine for relatively simple concepts, but when she starts talking about harder concepts, it just loses me completely. this was not for a lack of concentration on my part, the authoress, who is also the narrator, acknowledges in parts of the audio book that listeners might just have to live with the fact that they cannot see equations and to check the enclosed pdf if they want to follow along.
I might end up checking out the dead tree version of this book at some point, but simply put, I think this is kind of the "math's version of philosophy", using math concepts to express the authoresses' philosophy. As these books goes, how well you react to it will depend on how your worldview lines up with the authoress. Mine lines up well so I think i put up till the end of the book with it because what she does say about equality in plain english is worth listening to. its maybe a stretch as to how you can use math equations or concepts to justify it, but hey, it takes all sorts.
Worth it if you're into math and want to see how stretchy it really is when it comes to asserting world views. =)
not recommended unless you are really into math.
January 26, 2026
Thank you Jacqueline for recommending this one, and happy birthday to you!
"Mathematics isn't a series of rules, facts or answers. It's an invitation into a way of thinking. Welcome in! I'm glad you're here."
"This might seem obvious, or it might seem extremely obscure (which is the fate of much of mathematics - seeming obvious to some people and obscure to others). [...] I think it is actually simultaneously obvious and obscure, which is, to me, a wonderful thing about mathematics."
"I also wanted to include it even if you don't understand it because the act of doing maths involves a lot of not-understanding things. It might seem that people who are good at maths are those who understand it all easily, but in the end I think that to make progress in maths one needs to get used to not understanding things but sitting with them anyway. I think a better indicator of your future success at maths is not how quickly you can understand something, but how long you can spend with something you don't understand."
"More dimensions lead to more nuance, and more nuance leads to us being able to communicate things with more detail, and thereby understand each other more deeply."
"A great deal of mathematics turns out to be about bringing into consciousness things that we are doing intuitively. Perhaps it's all a form of intellectual self-awareness."
"Mathematics isn't a series of rules, facts or answers. It's an invitation into a way of thinking. Welcome in! I'm glad you're here."
"This might seem obvious, or it might seem extremely obscure (which is the fate of much of mathematics - seeming obvious to some people and obscure to others). [...] I think it is actually simultaneously obvious and obscure, which is, to me, a wonderful thing about mathematics."
"I also wanted to include it even if you don't understand it because the act of doing maths involves a lot of not-understanding things. It might seem that people who are good at maths are those who understand it all easily, but in the end I think that to make progress in maths one needs to get used to not understanding things but sitting with them anyway. I think a better indicator of your future success at maths is not how quickly you can understand something, but how long you can spend with something you don't understand."
"More dimensions lead to more nuance, and more nuance leads to us being able to communicate things with more detail, and thereby understand each other more deeply."
"A great deal of mathematics turns out to be about bringing into consciousness things that we are doing intuitively. Perhaps it's all a form of intellectual self-awareness."
December 27, 2025
It's exactly what the title says: an exploration of the concept of equality across different mathematical domains. It's explained well and enthusiastically; those without an advanced math background will still learn a lot. However, the sections on category theory and homotopy theory are suddenly much more advanced than the surrounding material, and will probably confuse those not already familiar with the topics, or at least haven't read Cheng's other book, The Joy of Abstraction. It makes sense since this book also focuses on abstraction and developing mathematical maturity, something Cheng does really well. Overall it's an accessible book that's easily recommendable.
January 7, 2026
This book feels like the first couple weeks of lectures of an introduction to the philosophy of mathematics course. interesting and well written and reasoned and very logical, not groundbreaking.
January 16, 2026
Thought journey through places I never thought I’d even think about it – namely category theory, and similar fields. Didn’t understand at all, but worth the journey.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews