IRREPLACEABLE: The Art of Standing Out in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

by Pascal Bornet

AI and automation are reshaping our world at an unprecedented speed, making traditional skills obsolete and opening new doors of opportunity. Those who adapt and develop unique, irreplaceable abilities will thrive. What is your plan to remain indispensable, protect your business, and safeguard your humanity in this AI-driven world?

Pascal Bornet—award-winning AI expert, former McKinsey executive, and Top Voice in Technology with over 1 million LinkedIn followers—draws on 20 years of pioneering research to introduce the Three Competencies of the Future. These crucial abilities unlock the secrets of thriving in an AI-driven world while amplifying our uniquely human qualities.

In this book, you will discover practical strategies

Better understand AI, where it’s going, and what you need to look out for to survive and thrive. Avoid falling into the "AI Obesity" trap and its devastating consequences for you and your business. Elevate your career by learning how to leverage AI to your advantage and not lose your job to automation. Master the "Humics"—uniquely human abilities that AI can NEVER replicate—to create powerful human-AI synergies for you and your company. Scale your business into a powerhouse of efficiency, innovation, and trust.
Whether you're future-proofing your career, steering your organization through disruption, or preparing your children for tomorrow, IRREPLACEABLE offers a universal and comprehensive framework.

AI is not the destination; it's the vehicle that takes us to a more human future. This book is your GPS.

Stand out. Become IRREPLACEABLE.

Genres: Artificial Intelligence, Nonfiction, Business

277 pages, Kindle Edition

Published September 5, 2024

Reviews

[Jurgen Appelo · Rating 2 out of 5]

I stopped reading after three chapters and nearly one hundred mentions of the word IRREPLACEABLE (all caps). The message might be good, but I couldn't take it anymore.

[Mattia · Rating 4 out of 5]

I created a mind map summarizing the key concepts from the book. You can download it here for free.

Irreplaceable by Pascal Bornet offers a refreshing perspective on how to stay relevant in an AI-driven world. I found it incredibly empowering, especially the focus on embracing our Humics (Uniquely Human Abilities): creativity, critical thinking, and social authenticity. It’s a reminder that, in a world of machines, our adaptability and human traits are what truly set us apart. Highly suggested!

[Pooja Sund · Rating 5 out of 5]

Loved reading this excellent book!

I found the book very enlightening. Loved reading this treasure from my mentor and friend, Pascal. This book will definitely challenge readers and leaders to continuously adapt and reinvent themselves to remain irreplaceable in an ever-changing landscape. You can use this book as a framework to create a roadmap for staying ahead of the curve and making a lasting impact in a world shaped by technology. Each of these chapters contributes to a comprehensive exploration of the theme, offering us (readers) a well-rounded understanding of becoming irreplaceable in the context of AI and the future of work.

I wholeheartedly agree with Pascal that we are not just witnessing technological advancement; we're stepping into an era where AI, robotics, and computer vision merge, dramatically changing the landscape of human labor. All the best, Pascal for this wonderful book!

Cheers, Pooja Sund

[Ian P. Barkin · Rating 5 out of 5]

A stand out book on standing out

With AI seemingly everywhere, and impacting everything we do, it’s imperative to have a plan. This book not only explores the age of AI, it shares a methodology and approach to survive and thrive in life and work. It’s a great resource for anyone hoping to become irreplaceable.

[Yaritza Mcbride · Rating 5 out of 5]

I picked up IRREPLACEABLE expecting a survival manual for the robot takeover. What I got instead was a very polite reminder that I should probably start using my own brain again.

The book makes one thing clear. AI is great at speed, patterns, and optimization. Humans are great at… being human. Feeling, listening, judging messy situations, and leading real people. Bornet’s point is simple. If you try to out-machine a machine, you’re already done.

The “AI Obesity” idea is funny and painfully accurate. Rely too much on AI and your thinking muscles get lazy. I laughed, then quietly closed a few tabs I didn’t need open.

Yes, the title message shows up a lot, but the core argument lands. This isn’t about fearing AI or worshipping it. It’s about using it without slowly turning yourself into an automated version of a person.

Short read, clear message, and oddly motivating. If nothing else, it made me want to think a little more and copy-paste a little less.

[Zara Berry · Rating 5 out of 5]

An amazing book for the world we’re living in right now with AI. It really made me think about how we talk to our children today and how we should be thinking about AI not just now, but in the years ahead.

It asks big questions about what our world might look like as AI keeps advancing at an unbelievable pace. Fast, intense, and honestly a bit overwhelming at times.

I found it insightful, thought-provoking, and genuinely eye-opening in a way very few books manage to be. It feels authentic, grounded, and surprisingly inspiring. Whether you’re excited about AI or deeply unsure about it, this is a must-read.

[Josh · Rating 4 out of 5]

Pretty good book about how to not be replaced by AI! I think there are some great tips and advice for people to work in collaboration with AI and make sure that we help keep the human attributes in the picture.

[Jacques Coulardeau · Rating 4 out of 5]

It is difficult to conclude on this super hot subject of GenAI and its impact on the symboleracy, literacy, numeracy, and techneracy of Homo Sapiens as a species, a historical species which went and is still going through a phylogeny that brings them all the time to higher points and higher powers. Unluckily it has harmed the planet, and it has at least accelerated its cyclical evolution. Every invention, discovery, or development has expanded human capabilities by extending one physical or mental human capability and thus replacing that human capability with a machine or a mechanical procedure.

Will GenAI replace our human thinking? That question is legitimate, and the answer is “Yes if we do not cultivate the capabilities that the machine cannot reproduce, mimic, or vampirize.” That machine can do what it wants – if it wants anything that is based on the program in its Central Processing Unit – but it will not experience love in any comparable way as a human does. [Steven Spielberg, A.I. Artificial Intelligence, 2001] Love, of course, and hatred as well. It may mimic racism and convey racist ideas it has gathered in the clouds of our digital age, but it will not be able to experience the human feelings a racist person experiences, and their victims suffer through, including the ultimate knowledge that death might or even will be the (ex-)termination of their lives. A machine can commit genocide, and yet it is not genocidal because it does not know what it is doing. It only obeys what its CPU tells it to do.

However, and mind you Pascal Bornet is clear about it, we humans can excel beyond this GenAI. I am afraid an elite will be able to survive GenAI, but what dimension of the human mind will GenAI bring to mutation and phylogenic development? How will we develop a new potential expansion of our physical and mental being, and become something new, better, more developed? We go back to Buddhism and its “anicca” principle that everything constantly changes from one moment to the next. Many people, including Buddhists, think that this constant change is the disappearance of what exists now, and they do not see it is also the emergence of something better, more powerful, and more human. Right now, we do not see what’s coming. I do not think we need a Prophet for that, just a very proficient mind. Probably a team of such minds or even teams of such minds.

From simple bipedal walking, Homo Sapiens developed into a fast long-distance bipedal runner. From there then, he developed wheels, carts, bicycles, trains, planes and so many other means of transportation that are the extensions of our fast, bipedal, long-distance running. GenAI imitates and mimics our mental functions, and even our symbolic creativity, how can we use this to go one step, at least one step, further in our long phylogeny? Pascal Bornet does not suggest anything apart from focusing on three Humics we already have. What is beyond these three Humics that GenAI cannot even dream of challenging, at least within its present framework? Think of our ancestors who, for the first time in their migrations, came to a big river. What did they do to cross it? They had the choice between swimming (provided they had developed swimming), building some kind of “boat” that would carry them across with some help from oars that had to be invented, or even, inventing a bridge that could go from one bank to the other. When did Homo Sapiens build their first bridge? A long time after learning how to swim or building a boat with oars. Phylogenic Techneracy Oblige! “Honi soit qui mal y pense”

That's where GenAI is forcing us to go beyond our own limits. Once again. The adventure is far from being finished, except if some humans in our community decide to destroy the planet in order not to share it with anyone else in our community, or maybe after all someone from outside this planet, from out of space. E.T. versus Generative A.I. I'm not telling you: What a Generation!

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU

VERSON FRANÇAISE

Il est difficile de tirer des conclusions sur ce sujet brûlant de l’intelligence artificielle et de son impact sur le pouvoir symbolique humain, l’alphabétisme/lettrisme, la numéracie mathématique et la virtuosité technologique d’Homo Sapiens en tant qu’espèce, une espèce historique qui a tracé et trace encore une phylogénie qui l’amène sans cesse à des points de rupture vers des pouvoirs supérieurs. Malheureusement, cette/notre espèce a fait du mal à la planète, et elle a au moins accéléré son évolution cyclique. Chaque invention, découverte ou développement a élargi les capacités humaines en démultipliant une capacité humaine physique ou mentale et en remplaçant ainsi cette capacité humaine par une machine ou une procédure mécanique.

L’intelligence artificielle va-t-elle remplacer notre pensée humaine ? Cette question est légitime, et la réponse est « Oui, si nous ne cultivons pas les capacités que la machine ne peut pas reproduire, imiter ou vampiriser. » Cette machine peut faire ce qu’elle veut – si elle veut quelque chose qui est basé sur le programme de son unité centrale de traitement – mais elle ne ressentira pas l’amour de la même manière qu’un humain. [Steven Spielberg, A.I. Artificial Intelligence, 2001] L’amour, bien sûr, et la haine aussi. Elle peut imiter le racisme et véhiculer des idées racistes qu’elle a recueillies dans les nuages virtuels de notre ère numérique, mais elle ne sera pas capable de ressentir les sentiments humains qu’éprouve une personne raciste et que ses victimes subissent, y compris la connaissance ultime que la mort pourrait être ou sera même l’extermination de leur vie. Une machine peut commettre un génocide, et pourtant elle n’est pas génocidaire parce qu’elle ne sait pas ce qu’elle fait. Elle obéit seulement à ce que son processeur lui dit de faire. L’homme serait-il une machine ?

Cependant, et remarquez que Pascal Bornet est clair à ce sujet, nous, les humains, pouvons exceller au-delà de cette GenAI. Mais je crains que seule une élite soit capable de lui survivre, mais quelle dimension de l’esprit humain la GenAI apportera-t-elle à la mutation et au développement phylogénique qui produira cette élite ? Comment allons-nous développer une nouvelle expansion potentielle de notre être physique et mental, et devenir quelque chose de nouveau, de meilleur, de plus développé ? Nous revenons au bouddhisme et à son principe « anicca » selon lequel tout change constamment d’un moment à l’autre. Beaucoup de gens, y compris les bouddhistes, pensent que ce changement constant est la disparition de ce qui existe maintenant, et ils ne voient pas que c'est aussi l'émergence de quelque chose de meilleur, de plus puissant et de plus humain. Pour l'instant, nous ne voyons pas ce qui vient. Je ne pense pas que nous ayons besoin d'un prophète pour cela, juste d'un esprit très compétent. Probablement d'une équipe de tels esprits ou même d'équipes de tels esprits.

De la simple marche bipède, Homo Sapiens est devenu un coureur bipède rapide sur longue distance. De là, il a développé des roues, des charrettes, des vélos, des trains, des avions et tant d'autres moyens de transport qui sont les extensions de notre course rapide, bipède et longue distance. GenAI imite et mime nos fonctions mentales, et même notre créativité symbolique, comment pouvons-nous utiliser cela pour aller un pas, au moins un pas, plus loin dans notre longue phylogénie ? Pascal Bornet ne suggère rien d'autre que de se concentrer sur trois Humiques que nous avons déjà. Qu'y a-t-il au-delà de ces trois Humiques que GenAI ne peut même pas rêver de remettre en question, du moins dans son cadre actuel ? Pensez à nos ancêtres qui, pour la première fois de leur migration hors d’Afrique Noire, se sont retrouvés face à un grand fleuve, ou les bras de mer entre Djibouti et Aden et le détroit d’Ormuz. Comment ont-ils fait pour les traverser ? Ils avaient le choix entre nager (à condition d’avoir développé la nage), construire une sorte de « bateau » qui les porterait à l’aide de quelques rames qu’il fallait inventer, ou encore inventer un pont qui permettrait de passer d’une rive à l’autre (ils n’ont pas encore atteint ce stade là de leur phylogénie.. Quand Homo Sapiens a-t-il construit son premier pont ? Bien longtemps après avoir appris à nager ou à construire un bateau à rames ou à voile. Technoratie phylogénétique oblige ! « Honi soit qui mal y pense. »

C’est là que GenAI nous force à dépasser nos propres limites. Une fois de plus. L’aventure est loin d’être terminée, sauf si certains humains de notre communauté décident de détruire la planète pour ne la partager avec personne d’autre de notre communauté, ou peut-être après tout quelqu’un de l’extérieur de cette planète, de l’espace. E.T. contre A. I. Générative. Je ne vous dis pas : Quelle Génération !

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU

[Rudi Manfrin · Rating 5 out of 5]

Pascal Bornet’s book, "Irreplaceable," is a transformative resource for anyone navigating the complexities of AI and its impact on our world. As someone deeply involved in digital health and the One Health approach at the European Commission's Joint Research Centre, I found Bornet’s insights particularly relevant and inspiring.

The book offers a well-structured framework that is both practical and visionary, challenging readers to embrace AI while maintaining a strong focus on human-centric skills and values. Bornet's emphasis on collaboration between AI and humans resonates deeply with my work on digital health and preparedness for emerging (one) health crises.

Chapters 9, 10, 14, and 15 stood out to me, providing valuable insights and strategies that align with my scientific and entrepreneurial pursuits. The book's comprehensive approach to integrating AI tools and semantic dashboards is a great source of inspiration for those of us working in complex science-policy ecosystems. This is exactly why we EMBRACE creating science for policy digital dashboards & visuals for eg. decoding the global depression crises combining AI with humics skills.
Bornet’s book is as such also a call to action for addressing global challenges like the mental health crisis, encouraging us to leverage AI responsible and innovatively. Since the depression topic is a fil rouge in Bornet's book it even more inspired me reading his views and experiences and linking it to our science for policy report "Decoding Depression" (almost issued).
The engaging narrative and actionable insights make this a must-read for anyone looking to make a significant impact in the AI era.

I highly recommend "Irreplaceable" to experts and newcomers alike. It’s a great read for those seeking to harness AI’s potential while enhancing our uniquely human qualities. Bornet for sure used this blend for writing his book :)

Thank you, Pascal, for issuing such an insightful and impactful guide.

Best,
Sandra Coecke

[Steve Brock · Rating 5 out of 5]

I have selected this book as Stevo's Business Book of the Week for the week of 12/22, as it stands heads above other recently published books on this topic.

[Casen Potts · Rating 5 out of 5]

It’s honestly hard to draw clean conclusions about something as intense and fast-moving as Generative AI and what it’s doing to us as humans. As a species, we’ve always been evolving mentally, socially, and technologically. That journey has taken us to incredible heights, but it has also damaged the planet and sped up cycles of change we barely understand. Every big invention has worked the same way. It extends a human ability and slowly replaces the need for us to use that ability ourselves. Muscles became machines. Memory became storage. Calculation became software.

So the big question is whether GenAI will replace human thinking. I think the answer is yes, if we stop nurturing the parts of ourselves that machines simply can’t live or feel. AI can process, predict, and imitate. But it doesn’t love. It doesn’t hate. It doesn’t feel fear, grief, or joy. Like in A.I. Artificial Intelligence, it can copy emotions, but it can’t experience them. It can repeat racist ideas because it finds them in data, but it doesn’t feel the cruelty or pain tied to them. Even if a machine is used to commit horrific acts, it isn’t evil in itself. It has no understanding. It just executes instructions.

People like Pascal Bornet argue that humans can still rise above GenAI, and I agree, but probably not everyone equally. An elite group may adapt better and faster. The deeper question is what kind of mental evolution this technology is pushing us toward. Buddhism talks about anicca, the idea that everything is constantly changing. Many people see that as loss or disappearance, but it’s also about becoming something new. We may not yet see what’s coming, and maybe we don’t need prophets, just sharp, thoughtful minds working together.

Human history gives us a clue. We learned to walk on two legs, then to run long distances. Later, we built wheels, carts, bicycles, trains, and planes. Each invention didn’t erase us. It took us further. GenAI now imitates our thinking and creativity. So the real challenge is what the next step is. What is the bridge we haven’t built yet? Early humans first swam rivers, then made boats, and much later built bridges. That didn’t happen overnight. GenAI is forcing us into that same moment again, standing at the river, figuring out how to cross.

The story isn’t over. Unless, of course, we choose destruction over coexistence on this planet or beyond it. Humans, AI, maybe even something else entirely. What a strange generation to live in.

[Austin Theory · Rating 5 out of 5]

IRREPLACEABLE is one of those rare AI books that doesn’t just talk about technology, but talks directly to you. It asks uncomfortable but necessary questions. What makes you valuable when machines get smarter every year? What skills are you quietly letting fade? And what does it actually mean to stay human in an AI-driven world?

Pascal Bornet clearly knows his subject. His experience shows in the way he explains where AI is headed without turning it into hype or fear. What really makes the book stand out is the focus on action. This isn’t a book that leaves you anxious about automation. It gives you tools to think, adapt, and stay relevant.

The idea of “AI Obesity” was especially eye-opening. Relying too much on machines can weaken our own thinking and judgment if we’re not careful. That felt very real, especially in everyday work where shortcuts are tempting. Bornet doesn’t say don’t use AI. He says use it wisely, without outsourcing your humanity along with your tasks.

The concept of Humics is where the book really hits its stride. Creativity, empathy, critical thinking, and social connection are framed not as soft skills, but as the core skills of the future. AI can process and optimize, but it cannot genuinely connect, lead with meaning, or build trust the way humans can.

What I appreciated most is that this book works for different readers. Professionals, leaders, parents, and business owners will all find something useful here. It’s practical without being shallow, thoughtful without being heavy, and optimistic without being naive.

If you’re looking for a guide that helps you use AI without losing yourself in the process, Irreplaceable is a solid and reassuring read. It reminds you that the future doesn’t belong to those who automate the fastest, but to those who stay deeply, intentionally human

[Jorge Enrique Alzate · Rating 4 out of 5]

I gained much clarity about what AI can't replace, which is what the book delivers most strikingly. Creativity, empathy, leadership, and being a good listener are the human superpowers that AI simply does not offer - not even close. He describes the human capabilities that AI will never master as Humics: genuine creativity, critical thinking, and social authenticity. The author does well to repeat this mantra frequently, supported by numerous studies and examples from his research. Surprisingly, I gained insight into coaching practices from a book on AI! In his study with the nomadic Tuareg people, he learned about their practice and belief in the constant change of their habitat. By moving their camp, they cultivate the deliberate practice of change and learn to embrace it as possibilities, rather than losing what they have. In this manner, they are prepared for when change comes to them externally. This mindset practice is crucial for anyone dealing with and adapting to change, especially in the current context of AI.

Yes, the constant refrain of the word Irreplaceable can get annoying. But this quote forgave all: "The future doesn't give a damn about your child's diploma or IQ score. The future belongs to the IRREPLACEABLE-those who think and feel, not just those who process and memorize."

The final few chapters focused on adapting these concepts to a business or company, and the tables started to overload the pages; this section fell flat for me. Overall, a strong message about human superpowers that AI will never replace.

[Jeena Lin · Rating 5 out of 5]

After reading IRREPLACEABLE, I kept thinking about how differently it approaches AI compared to 21 Lessons for the 21st Century.

Harari’s book looks at AI and technology from a wide, almost bird’s-eye view. It asks big philosophical questions about power, politics, truth, and how humans might lose control over systems they created. It is sharp, sometimes unsettling, and very intellectual. You close it feeling informed, but also slightly overwhelmed by how fragile humanity seems.

Irreplaceable works in the opposite direction. Pascal Bornet brings the discussion down to a very personal level. Instead of asking “What will AI do to humanity?” he asks “Who will you be in a world full of AI?” The focus is not fear or speculation, but practical clarity. What parts of you still matter. What skills you should stop neglecting. What machines will never truly touch.

While Harari warns about losing meaning, Bornet shows how to actively build it. The idea of Humics, creativity, critical thinking, empathy, and social authenticity, gives the reader something solid to hold on to. You are not just observing the future from a distance. You are preparing for it.

If 21 Lessons makes you pause and question the direction of the world, Irreplaceable helps you stand up and do something about your place in it. Together, they make a powerful pair. One explains the storm. The other teaches you how to stay human while walking through it.

[Brooke Taylor · Rating 5 out of 5]

I kept waiting for this book to tell me what tool to use.
It never did.
That annoyed me at first.

Most AI books feel like shopping lists. Learn this model. Use that workflow. Automate this task. Pascal Bornet refuses to play that game. Instead, IRREPLACEABLE keeps asking a much more uncomfortable question: what happens when everything gets easier, but you don’t get better?

The book reads like a long pause button. It slows you down in a world obsessed with speed. The idea of “AI Obesity” felt uncomfortably accurate. Not in a dramatic way. In a quiet, everyday way. Fewer decisions made. Less thinking. More delegation to machines without noticing the cost.

What surprised me most is that this book feels more philosophical than technological, but without drifting into vague ideas. The stories about education, leadership, and even nomadic cultures aren’t there to impress you. They’re there to show how adaptation is a practice, not a reaction.

I don’t think this book will change how companies use AI overnight. But I do think it might change how individuals show up to work the next day. More alert. More intentional. Slightly less automated.

This isn’t a book about staying ahead of AI.
It’s a book about not disappearing quietly while using it.

And that might be the more urgent conversation. Amazing read!

[Laurentiu Vasile · Rating 3 out of 5]

While so much buzz about AI, driving value from it still a challenge and unclear on how we humans will need to change the book is a valuable resource when trying to answer some of the questions about how we can co-create the future. What are the non-AI skills that we need to develop? Is Critical thinking required? It is quite interesting to find out that AI is aware and can provide feedback on 188+ human biases while we have struggled for 10ths of years in organization to understand them when taking decisions. Counterintuitive, social abilities will be more in demand with AI increasing its footprint in our work life. Jobs will evolve, new ones will be created but we will be pushed to learn and change.
The 100 USD question answered in the book is how we can learn more effective? Space learning , storytelling and sleep are just few of the ways we can improve.
Last but not least I have enjoyed the "new" mindset required to co-exist if we want to work smarter and not harder. The 5 principles from the book may become a great orientation toolkit for us in the future(e.g balancing efficiency over effort, looking at value instead of volume,.....) I hope you will enjoy it as well!

[Jackson Clark · Rating 5 out of 5]

Reading IRREPLACEABLE felt like standing in a room where the lights are slowly getting brighter. Nothing explodes. No alarms. You just start noticing things you’ve been ignoring.

What Pascal Bornet is really talking about isn’t AI. It’s attention. Responsibility. The quiet erosion of thinking that happens when answers arrive too quickly and decisions feel optional. AI doesn’t take anything from us. We hand things over because it’s easier.

The Humics idea lands not because it’s clever, but because it’s obvious in hindsight. Machines don’t hesitate. They don’t doubt. They don’t care if a decision hurts someone. Humans do, and that friction is the point, not the flaw.

This book doesn’t motivate you. It corners you. It asks whether you’re still choosing how you think, or just reacting to outputs. It doesn’t say the future will be human. It asks whether you still want it to be.

I don’t know if “irreplaceable” is the right word. But I do know this. If we lose judgment, empathy, and meaning in the process of adopting AI, whatever replaces us won’t be better. It’ll just be faster.

That’s not a technical problem.
That’s a human one.

[John Deardurff · Rating 4 out of 5]

Irreplaceable is a reassuring, and practical guide for anyone navigating the AI‑driven future. The book’s core message is clear: don’t be scared; be prepared. Instead of fueling anxiety about automation, the goal is to focus on how one can thrive by developing the qualities that the machines can’t replicate. The author explains the difference between what AI does well (speed, accuracy, data-driven output) and what only humans do well: thinking creatively, acting ethically, and showing genuine authenticity.

The book’s strength is its practicality. It lays out a simple framework for adapting and leveraging AI where it helps, protecting privacy, using it responsibly, and intentionally developing uniquely human capabilities. This term is called "Humics" which comprises things like creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. Instead of warning about job loss, the book focuses on how to merge human strengths with AI to become truly irreplaceable with confidence; not fear.

[River Lancaster · Rating 5 out of 5]

Reading this felt like having a long, thoughtful conversation with someone who has lived through a few technological shifts and isn’t easily impressed anymore. What stood out most to me was the calm confidence that humans are not done evolving, even if our tools are starting to look smarter than us.

The idea that AI can cause harm without knowing what it is doing is uncomfortable, but important. Machines don’t carry moral weight. Humans do. That alone changes how responsibility should be discussed in the age of GenAI. The piece also makes a strong point about inequality. Not everyone will adapt at the same speed, and that gap matters.

The historical comparison to early humans crossing rivers stayed with me. First swimming, then boats, then bridges. It reminds you that progress is layered, slow, and often messy. GenAI feels like standing on the riverbank again, unsure whether to jump in or start building. Either way, turning back isn’t an option. This review doesn’t predict the future, but it respects the complexity of getting there, and that honesty is refreshing.

[Kendyl Lewis · Rating 5 out of 5]

I’m usually suspicious of books that claim humans will always “win” against technology. That framing often feels lazy. What I appreciated about IRREPLACEABLE by Pascal Bornet is that it doesn’t promise safety. It promises responsibility.

The idea of Humics didn’t feel like motivational fluff to me. It felt more like a warning. If humans stop practicing judgment, empathy, and deep thinking, we shouldn’t be surprised when machines outperform us everywhere else. That part was uncomfortable, but fair.

I didn’t agree with everything. Some examples felt simplified. But the argument itself is honest. This book doesn’t say AI can’t replace you. It says it will, if you let it.

[Niz · Rating 5 out of 5]

An easy read. It is organized in a way that you can skim and jump your way through it looking for those nuggets of insights that resonate with you and your situation.

For example, I took a bunch from the first chapters that sets the argument and introduces ideas, concepts and terminology. As a teacher and parent, I spent more time on those chapters later on the book.

I jumped around the rest of the book focusing on the questions that resonated with me.

Overall it will be a good book to have on the shelf to dip into from time to time.

[Naomi Cox · Rating 5 out of 5]

This piece really made me stop and think. It doesn’t panic about AI, and it doesn’t worship it either. Instead, it asks a much more interesting question: what parts of being human do we still need to protect and grow? The comparison to how humans learned to cross rivers over time felt especially strong. We didn’t jump straight to bridges. We learned by trying, failing, and adapting. GenAI feels like another river moment. Uncomfortable, uncertain, but full of possibility if we don’t give up our ability to feel, reflect, and choose.

[Dwight Holcomb · Rating 5 out of 5]

Excellent insights on how to implement AI

If you are trying to understand AI, how to use AI, what you need to stand-out and get ahead with AI in a profound way, Pascal Bornet has given a fantastic resource to change the game for anyone searching for the right answers. Pascal's research and experience implementing AI for so many others allows him to design a road map for anyone to follow.
This book is a must-read for anyone seeking to find success using AI!

[Samuel Taggart · Rating 3 out of 5]

An interesting read. A pretty balanced take on AI. Not too critical. Not a boomer or doomer. Very practical. A little overly optimistic. A good plan for how AI can augment rather than replace humanity and how we can use that to our advantage.

Very individulistic right wing/libertarian view of it all though. Mostly about what individuals can do, not what we as a society can do. No mention of any regulation or guard rails.

[Rose Bell · Rating 5 out of 5]

I picked this up for work reasons and ended up thinking about my personal habits more than my company strategy. That surprised me.

I appreciated the real industry examples instead of vague promises. This book works well if you’re a leader trying to integrate AI without breaking trust, culture, or creativity. Not flashy, but very grounded.

[zoagli · Rating 2 out of 5]

I like the author’s LinkedIn posts – always food for thought there. But this book? It’s slim pickings. The one thing I want to remember is the general rule that if an activity doesn’t bring you joy nor personal growth, let AI handle it!

[Georgina Saunders · Rating 5 out of 5]

Read this in two sittings. Easy to follow. Clear message. Use AI, but don’t let it use you. If you want endless hacks, look elsewhere. If you want to think about who you’re becoming in all this, this book works.

[Austeja St. · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good ideas, however I felt they could be squeezed into twice less pages.

[Dennis · Rating 2 out of 5]

Most used words in this book, in rough order of frequency:

- IRREPLACEABLE
- unprecedented
- delve into

[Rogival Gregory · Rating 4 out of 5]

A relevant book about us and how to anticipate AI in our career and more broadly in our mindset.