This book is my first completed in the new year and it is stunning. And yes, it earned 5 stars. This collection of personal essays consists of poignant, beautiful, and powerful stories that will inspire and give hope. Heartache, fear and anger abound. Confidence, joy, and self-discovery and self-affirmation shine.
The level of introspection revealed is enormous. And I would guess this struggle is all the more pronounced or fraught due to familial, societal, and religious constructs. The contributors are vulnerable and forthcoming in these 18 pieces. I applaud their candor and strength—both intended and incidental.
My words here cannot reflect how much awe I experienced in these essays. The writers’ experiences cut deeply; and their insights, wisdom, and strength are raw, hard-earned, and beautiful. A friend asked me if this book was a “must get.” I respond emphatically here that it’s a “must have.”
I recommend this title because it affirms human connection….that our specific struggles or experiences can communicate something universal and at the same time, unique.
My favorite contributions were “The Decade of Saying All that I Could Not Say,” “Catching the Light: Reclaiming Opera as a Trans Arab,” “You Made Me Your Monster,” “Dating White People,” and “Unheld Conversations.”
Several quotes:
I live to complicate because I walk through many identities, each with their own oppressors.
“You can worship me,” he says, as if giving permission. I ask him, “Do you want that?” and he says, “You want that.” and he’s right. He is incredibly handsome, with warm brown eyes and shoulder-length hair, and has the most beautiful body, large and muscled and with just enough fat to indicate he lives a good life. Looking at him now, as we were together in a dark room and a dark city... I wonder whether his body appears so perfect to me because it is attached to him, to his handsome face and shy smile, the way he is wild in the bedroom but so timid outside of it, the way he walks the tightrope of boundaries and consent, the way he can pull me in and keep me at just enough of a distance to always want more.
…On stage I was in class impostor; at times, the racialised trespasser.
…The more my masculinity is perceived the more I am condemned, as a queer gender nonconforming Arab, for failing at it.
In opera, the performer must be transparent enough to allow the audience to see what they expect to see. The singer is the vessel, and the role itself is determined by signifiers: boys in pants and short hair, rich ladies in pearls, the poor in patches, and – though the Paris Opera staff forced a Muslim woman who is wearing a face covering to leave a performance of La traviata in 2014 – Muslim women are uniformly signified by their veils. The gaze can move in only one direction. There are rules about who gets to look, and what they're supposed to see.
…It was the fault of the individual if the traditions of the collective came tumbling down -- to transgress was to break down everyone’s feeling of safety in the collective. This is why queer Arabs can be viewed as such a threat to those in the community who conform. Our freedom is a projection of autonomy that many others have sacrificed; instead of embracing this, many lash out, for it destabilizes their lifelong decision to conform for the “greater good.”
Living in a foreign, often hostile country – one, indeed, bombing the very country we came from—can make you very territorial about your cultural identity.
There is a tendency among the audiences of marginalised authors, such as myself, to assume that every piece of writing is a reflection of real-life events that the author went through. There is this tunnel vision that many audience members get; it generalises the experience of one marginalised writer for it to become the general experience of that marginalised community. That tendency is a gaze that engulfs all who identify within one community under one simplistic version of a narrative.
(When her white girlfriend talked about taking Arabic language lessons and getting an Arabic tattoo) “She can't take this, too,” I said to myself. “Why do white people feel the need to take everything off everyone else?” I said out loud.
White people have a stunning power in English-speaking majority countries, and not in the ways that people talk about very often. The power is that they belong to, or operate in, calculated friendship cults that people of colour want to be loved and desired within. They are the white people who have mostly white friends but one Filipino who rides on their arm. They are the people who buy plastic jars of avocado hummus but would never drive through Bankstown. They are the white partner who refuses to teach themselves more about their partner’s stories and sociocultural context in a colonised world.
Withheld conversations about queer identity are an integral, load-bearing part of Arab culture. And for many queer Arabs, these withheld conversations serve us. They serve us structurally: by providing shields that, in many places, literally save lives from legal and social censure. They invite convenient amnesia, avert judicious eyes, swallow tuts at the back of the throat. They form a screen around particular bars in Beirut, a discreet bookshop in Cairo. Thanks to withheld conversations, our relationships with our grandparents can continue, with a manageable amount of intergenerational disorientation and judgment. The absence of conversations about queerness are the best-case scenario for those who are unable to offer their acceptance; the most they can do is clear a blank space on a map and stand on the edges, looking the other way.