Review: Deep House by Jeremy Atherton Lin
I remember reading Gay Bar back in 2022, while in Mexico City. I found it blazing and inspiring—mostly because of how singular and bold Jeremy’s voice felt throughout the book. Oddly, in 2025, as I tried to reread Gay Bar ahead of Deep House’s release, something felt off. Had I not noticed the cracks before—the very gaps that now widen into deep, unredeemable chasms in this new book? What happened?
Unfortunately, Deep House is all over the place. It’s as if Jeremy wasn’t sure what voice to strike, and you can quite literally feel someone losing their footing—throwing anything at the page in hopes that something might stick. The result is disorienting.
A few key elements made this an especially unpleasant reading experience for me:
1. A lack of narrative thread:
The book oscillates between Jeremy’s relationship with his partner, their coming of age, the legalization of gay marriage, and scattered, memoir-adjacent reflections on artists, theorists, and family. There could have been a throughline here—but Jeremy squanders it. I don’t think he knew where to draw the line between intimacy and overextension. That uncertainty bleeds into the chapters, leaving the reader to constantly ask: What is the purpose of this? Maggie Nelson, whom both Jeremy and I revere, has said: let people say what they want to say. Sure. But when the “why” behind that saying is missing, it makes for a frustrating experience. This book suffers from that very absence.
2. Jarring shifts in tone and language:
Jeremy code-switches aggressively—from hypersexual, emotionally heightened personal chapters to rigorously academic (and frankly, boring) sections. I typically love when memoirs blend the personal and the theoretical, but the shifts here are so abrupt, they become unreadable. One wonders: was this intended as a kind of art piece, a reflection of inner fragmentation? Maybe. But the execution falters, and I don’t know if I can excuse it on intention alone. The result is disjointed, and ultimately, alienating.
3. The portrayal of Famous feels hollow:
This is the most controversial take I’ll share, but Deep House, like another memoir I couldn’t connect with—Hua Hsu’s Stay True—suffers from a flattening of its central subject. Jeremy’s partner, Famous, feels more like a symbol or narrative device than a full person. And that’s hard to accept in a memoir so centered on their shared journey—through immigration, gay marriage, and emotional entanglement. Why do we know so little about Famous’s interiority? Why did he move on a whim? What did he feel when his mother was diagnosed with cancer and he couldn’t travel to her? What were his thoughts on being at the center of their sexual adventures? He remains a bystander in a story that heavily leans on his presence.
At a time when a book like this could illuminate urgent themes—immigration, gay marriage, the shifting nature of queer identity—it’s frustrating to walk away feeling so little. I wanted to feel moved. Instead, I felt disconnected. It’s my opinion, of course, but this felt like a classic sophomore slump.
That said, Jeremy’s voice does glimmer through now and then. I still believe he has something vital to say. I just hope the next book knows what that is.