Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fiction, And the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political And Religious Debate of Our Time

Rate this book
Looks at the stem cell controversy, covering the attempts of researchers to develop new treatments for a host of diseases and the arguments of stem cell opponents who contend that such research is against the laws of nature and religion.

262 pages, Hardcover

First published August 11, 2006

1 person is currently reading
24 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (4%)
4 stars
7 (29%)
3 stars
12 (50%)
2 stars
2 (8%)
1 star
2 (8%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for dopplereffectzebra.
1 review
May 26, 2021
Honestly don’t bother. This book held promise for the first twenty pages then it was all downhill. If I could rate it lower than 1 star I would. There is a debate around this topic but it wasn’t explored properly here.
Profile Image for Books Ring Mah Bell.
357 reviews366 followers
July 6, 2009

Do yourself a favor and pass it up for a more recent read.

There's a lot of these:
"a small mound of the beads looks like an impossibly fine pile of lumpfish caviar." (re: a cell separation system)

"this procedure, which is not too unlike shelling extremely delicate peas from a microscopic pod, must puncture and destroy the embryo. This allows the precious cargo of stem cells to spill out for collection on the petri dish medium like a handful of jewels strewn on a blood red carpet."

and so on. really.

Lots of interesting bits about the history of stem cell research, and the political and religious battles taking place, but none of these interesting bits were developed into more. And there is soooo much more.
Profile Image for Grant Davis.
62 reviews1 follower
Read
August 3, 2011
This book showed great promise at first by being engaging and relevant. However, as the book passed it's half-way point, it became obvious what the author's beliefs were and one could not help but read it in every paragraph. It is obvious that the author does not believe in any type of ethical restraint on stem cell research, but he fails to provide any tangible evidence that unrestricted embryonic stem cell research has ever been beneficial. This is a book comprised of "possibles" and "maybes" that shouldn't have been half of the length that it is.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.