Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics

The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature

Rate this book
Samuel Pufendorf's seminal work, "The Whole Dutyof Man, According to the Law of Nature" (firstpublished in Latin in 1673), was among the first tosuggest a purely conventional basis for natural law.Rejecting scholasticism s metaphysical theories, Pufendorf found the source of natural law in humanity sneed to cultivate sociability. At the same time, hedistanced himself from Hobbes s deduction of such needsfrom self-interest. The result was a sophisticated theory ofthe conventional character of man s social persona andof all political institutions.Pufendorf wrote this work to make his insightsaccessible to a wide range of readers, especiallyuniversity students. As ministers, teachers, and publicservants, they would have to struggle with issues ofsovereignty and of the relationship between church andstate that dominated the new state system of Europe inthe aftermath of the Peace of Westphalia (1648)."The Whole Duty" was first translated into English in1691. The fourth edition was significantly revised byanonymous editors to include a great deal of the veryimportant editorial material from Jean Barbeyrac sFrench editions. This was reproduced in the fifth editionfrom 1735 that is republished here. The English translationprovides a fascinating insight into the transplantationof Pufendorf s political theory from a German absolutistmilieu to an English parliamentarian one.Samuel Pufendorf (1632 1694) was one of the most important figures in early-modern political thought. Anexact contemporary of Locke and Spinoza, he transformed the natural law theories of Grotiusand Hobbes, developed striking ideas of toleration and of the relationship between church andstate, and wrote extensive political histories and analyses of the constitution of the German empire.Jean Barbeyrac (1674 1744) wasa Huguenot refugee who taughtnatural law successively in Berlin, Lausanne, and Amsterdam, and editedand translated into French the majornatural law works of Grotius, Pufendorf, and Cumberland.Andrew Tooke (1673 1732) was headmaster of Chaterhouse School and professor of geometry at Gresham College, London.Ian Hunter is Australian Professorial Fellow in the Centre for the History of European Discourses, University of Queensland.David Saunders is ProfessorEmeritus in the Faculty of Arts atGriffith University.Knud Haakonssen is Professor ofIntellectual History at the University ofSussex, England."

401 pages, Unknown Binding

First published January 1, 2012

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Samuel von Pufendorf

339 books21 followers
Baron Samuel von Pufendorf was a German jurist, political philosopher, economist, statesman, and historian. His name was just Samuel Pufendorf until he was ennobled in 1684; he was made a Freiherr (baron) a few months before his death in 1694. Among his achievements are his commentaries and revisions of the natural law theories of Thomas Hobbes and Hugo Grotius.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (40%)
4 stars
4 (40%)
3 stars
2 (20%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Hugo Sexton.
10 reviews
October 24, 2025
Pufendorf's work is a valuable addition to natural law theory. In following this tradition, he justifies man's duties to his community and others in secular terms while not disputing the existence of God. For Pufendorf, the aim of the state or the sovereign power is the security and sociability of the citizens. As such, he sees the church and the state as serving separate purposes (the church aiming for salvation) so concludes that they should not be combined.
Pufendorf's philosophy is a good amendment to that of Hugo Grotius, who is referenced extensively in this work. The main distinction between these two natural law theorists is that Grotius believes that human nature is inherently social and natural law is the realisation of this inherent trait, whereas Pufendorf believes that in order to preserve the sociability of man, natural law must be codified into positive civil law. This has the benefit of emphasising the role of sociability in human nature without discrediting the presence of discord and competition, or implying that sociability is inevitable in a society.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews