Tao Lin is someone I wouldn’t want to be who writes books I wouldn’t want to write, and I find his work compelling. Having previously read only two of his prose works (Shoplifting… and Taipei) and browsed his YouTube oeuvre, he stood as something of a negative example, an embodiment of the pitfalls writers in what I’m tempted to call our generation (but really a certain subset of people; few of us are Brooklynite scions of LASIK-stature fortunes) might be snared by. Self-deprecatingly narcissistic, emphatically apolitical, both clever and unmannered in an anything-goes way, an approach in which any detail is admissible to the work, with a slight preference for the disarmingly mundane or non-sequitur. Self-referentiality less thematized than obligatory. Lin’s books profess a congenital inability to successfully navigate any intersubjective situation, whether that’s reading a face (faces which frequently fail to betray the often oxymoronic emotions Lin ascribes to their owners), maintaining a romantic relationship, or give a reading of the work that, we sense, comforts Lin because the reader cannot easily talk back (though I do not read his blogging, and I could be wrong).
Lin’s diet (in this book, vegan, though he isn’t any longer) and more-ethical consumption are frequent items of mention in his work – partly because his work is about the mundane. These, in his prose works, struck me to function as value-neutral markers of class, location, identity and so on rather than as positive commitments to any social project. However, in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Lin movingly interrogates his own relationship to politics, and his failure to make it a subject of his life or art. In “room night,” his best poem about this issue, he signifies his inability to sustain enthusiasm for the social by writing “‘i need to go read my blog/to find out what my politics are’”. Elsewhere, he offers something of an apologia for his art:
“The hamster sometimes thought about war, politics, globalization, and world trade but mostly about things like death, writing, existence, loneliness, and meaninglessness that to it often preempted — despite its philosophy regarding the value of life—economy, capitalism, society, and materialism.”
Like his inability to read faces, the subjects of his writing are congenital, an ill-functioning human struggling under the burden of the “unidirectional nature of time.”
The title refers to Lin’s strange mix of Skinnerism and ascetic ideals (Buddhism and Stoicism particularly). Connected with this is a vague concern with animal issues and only shoplifting from publicly traded corporations. We wonder, with his abandonment of veganism, if this ‘cognitive-behavioral therapy’ is likewise a momentary enthusiasm, whether inertia necessarily drags Lin into the destructive, amoral, self-serving-and-self-abusing habits portrayed in his latest work.
This book of poetry, though, is seasoned with moments of generosity of spirit, even of hope and faith in the Others Lin is incapable of connecting with:
“in our time of suffering my poetry will remain calm/and indifferent – something to look forward to/innate in all taco bell patrons is the possibility/of phenomenal poetry – something to look forward to”
It’s impossible to consider Lin’s art without considering Lin. He invites this convolution both in his art and in his public behavior. He welcomes (even if he only wryly responds to) tabloidic, invasive personal questions. He plays pranks on publishers and audiences just as his poetic stunts toy with readers.
Lin is an interesting figure in American letters; let’s hope there aren’t any others like him.
(If we judge from the omnipresent attempts on Amazon of reviewers imitating him while praising him, there won't be. Tao Lin has genuine chops, or at least persistence).