On paper, this book was right up my street: a historical mystery with a bit of romance. Unfortunately, it didn't quite live up to expectations. It's a decent book and I'm sure that for many readers it'll provide entertainment and escapism, but for me it was a disappointment.
The book follows Miss Cora Beaumont, an American heiress, and her future brother-in-law, Nicholas Tristan, the heir to a British dukedom. The story starts in 1890, right after Miss Beaumont gets engaged with Terrence, Nicholas's younger brother. It's not a love match; instead, it was agreed on by the fathers and the future bride and groom barely know each other. The engaged couple, together with Nicholas and a female cousin are travelling from America to Southampton when a gruesome murder takes place.
I found the mystery somewhat weak. Yes, there's a series of murders and both protagonists try to find the killer, but they don't really discover anything. They just wander around the ship bumping into things, they don't ask obvious questions, they make wrong assumptions based on little evidence and, in general, they are quite clueless. I was also quite surprised that they couldn't tell the difference between a blood or a wine stain (to me it's pretty obvious, but perhaps I'm some sort of expert in stains thanks to regularly doing the laundry and having children!). Finally, there were some red herrings that didn't really help.
Now, a weak mystery subplot could be compensated with a good romance. But, again, I found it "just so". At least it was clean (let's be grateful for little mercies). The end/declaration was disappointing not only because it lacked emotion, but also because some aspects are left hanging; I get the (maybe wrong) impression that they are left like this so the slow burn romance and romantic unresolved tension may continue in some future books. Also, she seems to worry much more about her future and her economic independence than about marrying the wrong guy. I understand her concerns, but if that clearly takes priority to being with Nicholas, maybe she's not really in love? Finally, the love triangle didn't sit well with me. Almost from the beginning of their joint investigation both protagonists feel a growing attraction but, instead of trying to avoid each other's company or come clean and talk to their brother/fiancé, they keep on finding themselves in intimate situations while they pretend that everything is fine with the engagement. This is too close to cheating for my comfort (and the fact that the fiancé is not very likeable makes for no excuses).
The third interesting feature for me, the historical setting, was also disappointing. The first hint that I was going to be frustrated was the repeated use of wrong form of address for titled people. Honestly, it doesn't take much research to get it right! Then comes the airship where the action takes place. Since I didn't know much about this means of transport, I did a bit of internet search (blame my nerd self). Wrong move! To start with, the first commercial passenger-carrying airship dates from 1910, 20 years later! Also, after seeing some blueprints and pictures of how the interior of more recent/modern airships, there was no way I could reconcile the descriptions in the book with any realistic airship. Why not simply have them travelling by sea on a luxurious passenger steamship? It'd be way more credible. The third historical mistake is the reference to the suffragette movement, which is supposed to have been founded in 1903 (13 years later!). At some point in the story this movement is linked with some riots or protests taking place in India... I'm no expert and I may be wrong, but I really doubt that women's' right to vote (or women's rights in general) was at the forefront of any protests in 1890s India. In summary, the historical blunders were too obvious and too many. Of course, other readers may not be so picky and still enjoy the story, but they really did spoil it for me.
Finally, I found the pace a bit slow and I really had to force myself to keep on reading. Again, this may be more of a personal taste, but I found the first-person narration (from a dual point of view) too tiresome, with an excess of inner thoughts that didn't contribute to understanding the story or the characters and, instead, slowed down the pace.