What do you think?
Rate this book


ebook
First published August 10, 2013
1. do you like reading the slave trope, or will you get offended on behalf of pleasure slaves in ancient Rome and how dare the author make them enjoy it?
PS. the author did make all sexually active characters aged 17+
2. do you enjoy reading historical fiction but don’t mind the fact, the author chose to write it in modern English?
3. are you in the mood for erotica with plot? lots and lots of flirting? fun and so far noncomplex cast of mostly sexy characters?
4. If yes, then do you mind your MCs being flirty and sexual with other characters before and after meeting? a married MC sleeping with his wife off screen? having a not so secret lover, (my favorite character)? owning a few pleasure slaves? because everyone is horny for everyone all the time!
The 5 Things I Love About Dominus (Which Are Sometimes Very Unjustly Listed As Faults):
1) The Style and the Gargatuan Amounts of Swearing: Seriously, if you've ever visited Pompeii, or read the graffitis, or even if you've read Catullus's later poems, or I could quote some Martial, you'd know that the Romans were really, really foul-mouthed. It didn't really matter that they would call someone a shit-face in senate, or a cunt on a wall, they'd done it early and done it often. Also the ironic, light-hearted style was a treat, sometimes it reminded me of Petronius when the author described some ridiculous characters (although I didn't particularly like how my favorite empire was described as an entitled brat). It was an interesting contrast to the dark side of the story, the war and its horrors overshadowing the whole plot, the nasty system of slavery, the inequalities of the Roman society as a whole.
2) The Characters: Alright, I have to admit, when I read a romance novel (or basically anything that includes people getting involved with each other, which is, when I read literature, period), I just love beauty made into words. I loved the thorough description beautiful hair, eyes, faces, bodies, the detailing, which almost made me feel like I was touching them. Maybe I'm shallow, or maybe, just maybe it's an inherent part of human nature to be strongly drawn towards beauty. So I found the characters' radiant beauty (I mean, basically all of them are stunning) and their constant lust really amusing, whether it's "realistic" or not. Also I felt like beauty and sex are the only good things that ever happened to them: they all have very sorrowful, complicated lives (even the billionaire Gaius, I mean he waged wars, for crying out loud, the rest would be spoiler I guess), they're mostly alone with their thoughts and feelings, and the only time they can make a connection is when having sex with each other. It's also kind of a contrast, like the style.
3) The Master-Slave dynamic: I know... I know. But. At first I had a hard time coming round to appreciating how it was described in the book. I mean how can a man overpowering another be sexy? Well, apparently it can. It's not the system I praise, gods forbid, it's just that I guess love and lust are rarely politically correct. You can be attracted to all kinds of depraved stuff, things that you wouldn't approve of, like, ever - it just turns you on. And in life, of course, you need two consenting adults, but it's a book, and there are slippery slopes and disturbing bits about it - for me it added to the complexity. I mean the reader is never asked to approve of everything he/she reads - the reader is only asked to consider it. I never told I was comfortable with this stuff - in fact, that was the most uncomfortable thing about it -, and I'm on the edge of never even believing a slave could have genuine feelings for his master, apart from Stockholm Syndrome... but still. I have a million thoughts about it, and it's great.
4) Nobody's Fucking Poor: So I have to admit I'm a Historian, and I have studied the Romans quite a lot, and guess what, we mostly know about the rich. It's quite obvious, they could write, moreover, they could hire the best of the best to write about them (seriously, to parallel the case, imagine Donald Trump commissioning Jonathan Franzen to write his praise for 3 zillion dollars - and he does), and actually, they were more sparkly and interesting. I mean, every rich person has their unique way, but every poor person seems very similarly poor - which is untrue, but that's the general idea. For now, we know very little of Rome's poor: they lived in houses built from cheap materials that never remained, they never had works of art in their homes, they buried their dead with little pomp and few grave goods - for Archaeologists and Historians, it's really hard to figure out how exactly they lived their lives (we're trying though).
5) Oh The Details & The Historical Accuracy: (Which is not listed as a fault, but I still love it, so here it goes.) It's one of the perks of having studied Classics, but I really loved the descriptions of certain objects, buildings, artwork. I can imagine the author has researched the era thoroughly. I also appreciated the depiction of Emperor Trajan, whom I always thought of as an enlightened tyrant, like Louis XIV. His history with Gaius adds a really dark touch to the main character's storyline.
Also, the porn. I really like that, too.