This is Edmund White's latest book, but actually his last book because he has died and will write no more. Under the circumstances I am posting thoughts on White, not all my own, but even those that aren't express what I feel, think and would have said if I could have.
"‘I thought,’ White wrote in his autobiographical masterpiece The Farewell Symphony (1997), ‘that never had a group been placed on such a rapid cycle, oppressed in the 50s, freed in the 60s, exalted in the 70s, and wiped out in the 80s.’ He was describing, as he always did, the generation of gay men of which he was a part. To his and our luck, he survived, living to be applauded in the 90s, unjustly overlooked in the 00s, and rediscovered in the 10s and the 20s by a new generation of gays for whom prophylactic antiretrovirals have brought back the industrial sexual liberation he wrote about in his novels.
"White described that sexual liberation in some of the most extraordinary prose this side of Henry James. His early novella Nocturnes for the King of Naples, more abstract and experimental than the novels for which he is better known, opens with several pages describing men cruising on the Christopher Street piers in New York City:
"'Congeries of bodies; the slow, blind tread on sloped steps; the faces floating up like thoughts out of ink; then trailing away like thoughts out of memory; entrances and exits; the dignified advance and retreat as an approaching car on the highway outside casts headlights through the window and plants a faint square on the wall. The square brightens til it blazes, then rotates into a trapezoid narrowing to the point of extinction, its last spark igniting a hand raised to hit a face. A new square grows on the wall but when it veers off it rears not the stunned face, nor the punishing hand – ooze on old boards, nothing else.'
I read this work when I was 19 or 20, away from my Dublin home for the first time and beginning my life in London, it wasn't my first 'gay' book but it was close, it was definitely my first work of literature that was 'gay' - note I do not say 'gay' literature White is not a gay writer he is a writer of great novels, of great literature. That is why his books are not defined nor are of interest only to those who knew the post Stonewall world they come from. It is why his 'Farewell Symphony' is the novel about AIDS which will be read when readers need an explanation of what AIDS was in the same way that the Black Death has to be explained. But it won't matter because what he wrote in 'A Farewell Symphony' was not merely reportage it is a chronicle of life that outlast its circumstances in the way the novels of Henry James or Marcel Proust do.
It is worth remembering that even thirty years after Stonewall how homophobic the literary discourse remained. "John Updike opened a review of Alan Hollinghurst’s 1998 novel The Spell in the New Yorker with the complaint that Hollinghurst’s novels are ‘relentlessly gay’ and lack the ‘chirp and swing and civilising animation’ of ‘a female’. In gay fiction, Updike went on, ‘nothing is at stake but self-gratification’; even the most frivolous heterosexual writing, he proposed, was ‘sacralised’ by the ‘institution of the family’ and the ‘perpetuation of the species’. It is presumably such sacred bonds that Updike had in mind when he wrote, in The Widows of Eastwick (2008): ‘She said nothing then, her lovely mouth otherwise engaged, until he came, all over her face ... Her face gleamed with his jism in the spotty light of the motel room.’
"Two years earlier, James Wolcott wrote in the Wall Street Journal that The Farewell Symphony, the third part of White’s magisterial trilogy of gay life beginning with A Boy’s Own Story,had ‘a rather fancy title for a book that might have been more honestly called Hilly Buttocks I Have Known’. For Wolcott, a novel describing in rich prose the coming together in ecstatic communion and fast, painful, untimely death of a generation was ‘trashy’ gossip. Proposing that gay promiscuity requires a ‘defence’, Wolcott, in a sentence dripping with disdain, wrote that White ‘crams the page with such graphic, gross, non-stop, indiscriminate, inside-gayworld flutter and abandon that giving the characters names seems a mere courtesy, they’re such interchangeable receptacles’.
"But The Farewell Symphony, which borrows its title from Haydn, is full of brilliantly specific characterisation. One character, named Butler, is described as keeping ‘carbons of all his letters, which were obviously written with one eye on posterity, full of nature descriptions, lengthy impressions of historical monuments he’d visited and reflections on current social problems, all adorned with appropriate tags from Horace or Boileau’. Another, Sergio, encountered in a garden in Venice, has ‘a big, comic smile that was out of phase with his eyes, as though he were wearing a commedia dell’arte half-mask ... He had a prominent jaw and his face looked as though it were flooded with blood. Laugh lines flowed away from his eyes like the tails of colliding comets.’ ‘Interchangeable receptacles’?
"Writing these men as human beings was at the centre of White’s literary project. The narrator of The Farewell Symphony recalls: ‘I can still remember the joy in certain quarters when the “fags” started to die. It was not withheld. Not at all, it was a joyous, prancing, self-righteous, far-right victory lap.’"
How wonderful it would be to believe that those days and views are past but I have yet to look at the reviews on GR or elsewhere of any 'gay' novel which is actually written by a gay man and unafraid of describing their world which does not attract the fluttering of virginal distaste at the mention of penises or spunk.
That Edmund White survived for new generations of readers to discover and to continue writing brilliant inventive books is a miracle. Quite how unique White's talent is only becomes obvious when you see how few writers of White's generation, never mind later ones, have produced an oeuvre of similar significance and quality.
Everyone has to die and every death diminishes us all but, perhaps the sky god I don't believe in does have a sense of humour because while his acolytes were celebrating the apparent demise of 'gays' from his non existent wrath he allowed White to survive so gays could never be forgotten. Whether we should thank God for White's life is doubtful - but I am deeply thankful for it nonetheless.