What do you think?
Rate this book
Books That Changed the World
Vom Kriege van Clausewitz
Perhaps the most important book on military strategy ever written, Carl von Clausewitz’s On War has influenced generations of generals and politicians, has been blamed for the unprecedented death tolls in the First and Second World Wars, and is required reading at military academies to this day. But On War, which was never finished and was published posthumously, is obscure and fundamentally contradictory. What Clausewitz declares in book 1, he discounts in book 8. The language is confusing and the relevance not always clear. For a book that has truly changed the world, On War is extremely difficult for the general reader to approach, to reconcile with itself, and to place in context. Hew Strachan, one of the world’s foremost military historians answers these problems in this fascinating book. He explains how and why On War was written, elucidates what Clausewitz meant, and offers insight into the impact it made on conflict and its continued significance in our world today. This is a must read for fans of military history.
201 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2007
14 people are currently reading
368 people want to read
About the author
Hew Strachan
78 books73 followersHew Strachan was born and brought up in Edinburgh, and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 2003 and awarded an Hon. D.Univ., (Paisley) 2005. He is also Life Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, where he was successively Research Fellow, Admissions Tutor and Senior Tutor, 1975-92. From 1992 to 2001 he was Professor of Modern History at the University of Glasgow, and from 1996 to 2001 Director of the Scottish Centre for War Studies.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20 reviews
March 22, 2013
This is, to put it quite simply, the best book-length analysis of Clausewitz that I've ever read (and I've read nearly all of them).
Strachan's approach is thorough and even-handed: he recounts the major analytical themes of Clausewitz's earlier interpreters (writing in English, German, and French) alongside those of what might be called the second- and third-wave revisionists of the 1970s and the 2000s. He's able to synthesize what's come before into a complete, fair-minded, and nuanced appreciation of the varied theoretical threads that appear in On War.
Strachan concludes the book by noting that "Clausewitz's maturation was marked not by his making up his mind on" the many questions he'd considered in his quarter-century of serious thought and writing, "but by his growing commitment to the methodology of dialectics": his commitment to working through the differences between theory and lived experience to arrive at something true. A similar thing can be said about this book: Strachan's analytically mature approach is far less concerned with passing interpretive judgment than with arriving at a fair and accurate – if complicated and often contradictory – understanding of Clausewitz's evolving thought.
It's probably worth caveating this to say that Strachan's book is not really one for the beginner. It's not really an introduction to On War, and it can only very loosely be called a distillation of its major ideas. The book is best read by those who are already familiar both with Clausewitz's text and with the various interpretive schools, commentaries, and controversies. Which isn't to say that such background is essential, only that it will be very helpful to the reader as he tries not to uncritically adopt as his own every element of Strachan's very persuasive analysis.
Strachan's approach is thorough and even-handed: he recounts the major analytical themes of Clausewitz's earlier interpreters (writing in English, German, and French) alongside those of what might be called the second- and third-wave revisionists of the 1970s and the 2000s. He's able to synthesize what's come before into a complete, fair-minded, and nuanced appreciation of the varied theoretical threads that appear in On War.
Strachan concludes the book by noting that "Clausewitz's maturation was marked not by his making up his mind on" the many questions he'd considered in his quarter-century of serious thought and writing, "but by his growing commitment to the methodology of dialectics": his commitment to working through the differences between theory and lived experience to arrive at something true. A similar thing can be said about this book: Strachan's analytically mature approach is far less concerned with passing interpretive judgment than with arriving at a fair and accurate – if complicated and often contradictory – understanding of Clausewitz's evolving thought.
It's probably worth caveating this to say that Strachan's book is not really one for the beginner. It's not really an introduction to On War, and it can only very loosely be called a distillation of its major ideas. The book is best read by those who are already familiar both with Clausewitz's text and with the various interpretive schools, commentaries, and controversies. Which isn't to say that such background is essential, only that it will be very helpful to the reader as he tries not to uncritically adopt as his own every element of Strachan's very persuasive analysis.
January 24, 2013
At the revelation of my reading a couple books about Clausewitz's tome On War a trusted friend rebuked me.
Perhaps my friend was correct that there are problems with reading a secondary source before the primary source. Derivative thinking does have the risks of limiting the true, if original, lessons conveyed by the trusted primary source that one could learn directly. This is particularly true for On War, given Wilhem Rustow's oft-repeated proclamation that Clausewitz "has become well known, but is very little read." However, my friend could be wrong for two reasons. First, I wholely intend (and likely will be expected) to read On War. Second, it does not take a military genius to recognize that On War is going to be a difficult enough read, with consideration of the first reason, why solely rely upon my first and perhaps weak reflections when On War requires the whole discernment and cross-attribution of The Bible?
"The ponderous tomes of Clausewitz are so solid as to cause mental indigestion to any student who swallows them," according to B.H. Liddell Hart, "without a long course of preparation." Liddell Hart, a critic of Clausewitz, does provide me some vindication from my skeptical friend; and Hew Strachan's does not disappoint in this purpose.
Strachan's brief book titled Clausewitz's On War has all of the pitfalls that my friend warned me of: there is commentary, judgment, and speculation upon Clausewitz's work - these may tend to create an impediment to learning directly from 'Dead Karl.' So there is reason to remain guarded as you read this book. However, similarly to Michael Howard's Clausewitz: A Very Short Introduction , Strachan's work also attempts to build context for the reader. The difference from Howard is that Strachan hones in with laser focus upon what On War was implying for its readers within Clausewitz's time not of that of the reader's:
I highly recommend Hew Strachan's Clausewitz's On War, and I will be keeping both it and Howard's Clausewitz: A Very Short Introduction at reference-reach while reading Clausewitz's classic tome.
Perhaps my friend was correct that there are problems with reading a secondary source before the primary source. Derivative thinking does have the risks of limiting the true, if original, lessons conveyed by the trusted primary source that one could learn directly. This is particularly true for On War, given Wilhem Rustow's oft-repeated proclamation that Clausewitz "has become well known, but is very little read." However, my friend could be wrong for two reasons. First, I wholely intend (and likely will be expected) to read On War. Second, it does not take a military genius to recognize that On War is going to be a difficult enough read, with consideration of the first reason, why solely rely upon my first and perhaps weak reflections when On War requires the whole discernment and cross-attribution of The Bible?
"The ponderous tomes of Clausewitz are so solid as to cause mental indigestion to any student who swallows them," according to B.H. Liddell Hart, "without a long course of preparation." Liddell Hart, a critic of Clausewitz, does provide me some vindication from my skeptical friend; and Hew Strachan's does not disappoint in this purpose.
Strachan's brief book titled Clausewitz's On War has all of the pitfalls that my friend warned me of: there is commentary, judgment, and speculation upon Clausewitz's work - these may tend to create an impediment to learning directly from 'Dead Karl.' So there is reason to remain guarded as you read this book. However, similarly to Michael Howard's Clausewitz: A Very Short Introduction , Strachan's work also attempts to build context for the reader. The difference from Howard is that Strachan hones in with laser focus upon what On War was implying for its readers within Clausewitz's time not of that of the reader's:
'On War' is a book about war in the present and the immediate past - both of them Clausewitz's, not ours. It is not overtly a book about the future of war. Yet this is how it is often read, and not without reason.... Every generation has tended to look at what Clausewitz wrote in light of its own preoccupations, but in using his thoughts in this way is always in danger of treating the text selectively. That in itself is neither illegitimate nor inappropriate, but by the same token no one school can claim the monopoly of wisdom in its interpretation of Clausewitz's work.Strachan, not without acknowledgement of the irony of doing so, even quotes Clausewitz directly (from Book 8, Chapter 3 of On War):
Every age has had its own peculiar forms of war, its own restrictive conditions and its own prejudices.... The events of each age must, therefore, be judged with due regard to the peculiarities of the time, and only he who, less by an anxious study of minute details than by a shrewd glance at the main features, can place himself in each particular age is able to understand and appreciate its generals."To comprehend On War, it too has to be placed in the context in which it was written," Strachan explains to his readers as "[it] is first and foremost a response to one man's experience and to the wars through which he lived and in which he served." To wit, and apologies to my friend, Strachan's introduction has clouded my expectations of Clausewitz to the context of his time; but upon reading On War I also anticipate my interpretations of Clausewitz to be expanded by my own judgment and distilled against my own knowledge for application in the present or near-future.
I highly recommend Hew Strachan's Clausewitz's On War, and I will be keeping both it and Howard's Clausewitz: A Very Short Introduction at reference-reach while reading Clausewitz's classic tome.
February 17, 2024
This is a great relatively short read that mainly covers the experiences in Clausewitz life and why he developed his evolving options recorded in On War. I find it very unique toe see the point of view from a losing party in the napoleonic wars, it’s a rare insight on how things were outside of the heroic portrayals often displayed in films and media. Highly recommend for history majors or those who love military theory in general.
May 16, 2018
Professor Sir Hew Strachen is an acquaintance of mine and served as my thesis advisor. I have the utmost respect for him as a scholar and a writer.
This book is brilliant at one level, but-that level is a rather advanced one. This is not an introductory work. It is not for the casual reader. It is a comprehensive and very deep analysis of On War and some of Clausewitzs’ other writings. It is NOT an introduction, so be warned. It primarily uses the Howard/ Parat translation ( who doesn’t these days?) and goes into great depth on various themes, theoretical contradictions and language used etc.. A typical sentence goes thusly:“ this inherent contradiction in the use and misuse of the weight of defense, which gives the defender the advantage of time, is advocated in book six, but in book eight we can see an entirely different theoretical use thereof” . Strachens’ work is impressively comprehensive, but best read with On War open next to it.
This book is brilliant at one level, but-that level is a rather advanced one. This is not an introductory work. It is not for the casual reader. It is a comprehensive and very deep analysis of On War and some of Clausewitzs’ other writings. It is NOT an introduction, so be warned. It primarily uses the Howard/ Parat translation ( who doesn’t these days?) and goes into great depth on various themes, theoretical contradictions and language used etc.. A typical sentence goes thusly:“ this inherent contradiction in the use and misuse of the weight of defense, which gives the defender the advantage of time, is advocated in book six, but in book eight we can see an entirely different theoretical use thereof” . Strachens’ work is impressively comprehensive, but best read with On War open next to it.
June 14, 2012
Exceptionally well done and recommended. Strachan's book is a good primer on Clausewitz's On War is an invaluable resource.
November 19, 2017
Strachan, Hew, Vom Kriege van Clausewitz. Een biografie (2007; gepubliceerd in het Nederlands in 2009). Boeiende en belangrijke verhandeling over het leven van de militaire theoreticus Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831) en vooral de ontstaansgeschiedenis van het postuum gepubliceerde Vom Kriege. Beide staan in het teken van de Napoleontische oorlogen. De tijdloosheid van Clausewitz' werk wordt veroorzaakt door zijn filosofische behandeling van het fenomeen oorlog en het onaffe karakter ervan. Kanttekeningen bij dit werk zijn gemakkelijk te plaatsen. Zo is het euro- en landcentrisch. Maar Clausewitz brengt ook inzichten te berde die aan actualiteit weinig hebben ingeboet, zoals over de verhouding tussen politici en militairen. Clausewitz 'kleine oorlog' waarin niet-geüniformeerde strijders optreden, doet denken aan de Afghanistan-oorlog tegen de Taliban. Strachan's behandeling is deskundig en redelijk toegankelijk, al wordt de leesbaarheid gehinderd door talrijke verwijzingen naar boeken en hoofdstukken van Clausewitz's oeuvre. Een aansporing om 'the real thing' te gaan lezen. Cijfer: 8. Gelezen: 2009.
September 24, 2022
Hew Strachan probeert één van de meest invloedrijke boeken in de geschiedenis, dat tegelijk verre van onbekritiseerd is, te analyseren met aandacht voor context, impact en de veranderende fases in het leven van de beroemde Pruisische generaal zelf. Hoewel bij momenten onvermijdelijk technisch van aard, is de uiteenzetting globaal zeker de moeite voor wie de strategische én filosofische gedachten van Clausewitz beter wenst te begrijpen.
October 9, 2018
Strachan pens a biography of Carl von Clausewitz as well as how his seminal work "On War" has been used and applied in his time as well as in subsequent generations.
On War is used by many generals and politicians. Often called the Bible of war, it is indeed used like the Bible in that readers cherry-pick what they want to get out of it.
On War is used by many generals and politicians. Often called the Bible of war, it is indeed used like the Bible in that readers cherry-pick what they want to get out of it.
Read
November 21, 2020Dit boek dat inzicht geeft over Vom Kriege van Clausewitz leest lekker weg. Inhoudelijk is het goed, vanwege het belichten van het werk van Clausewitz van verschillende perspectieven. Wat het kracht van zijn werk zou moeten zijn en ook wat het in feite min of meer betekend. Een visie die in balans is over Clausewitz is het beeld wat je krijgt.
April 8, 2018
Great balance of coverage on the background of the man and his writings.
December 14, 2015
"Clausewitz's On War" by Hew Strachan is a kind of biography of Carl von Clausewitz, although the book concentrates on the literary work for which he is known. In a sense, it becomes a biography of this book in fact. H.S. first outlines von Clausewitz's origins and personal development, the wars in which he fought and other major events which might have influenced his writing. In a slightly hodge-podge way, he goes through the different books which build up 'On War'.
Rightly, quite a few pages are devoted to the Napoleonic wars, which definitely seem to be the foundation of von Clausewitz's analysis of war. I am not very familiar with this era, and therefore got lost in the chain of events and various personalities. This made it a slightly difficult read for me, but did not lessen the feeling that this is a high-quality book. Recommendable to anyone interested in military history in general and also people interested in the military events underpinning the 1800s.
Rightly, quite a few pages are devoted to the Napoleonic wars, which definitely seem to be the foundation of von Clausewitz's analysis of war. I am not very familiar with this era, and therefore got lost in the chain of events and various personalities. This made it a slightly difficult read for me, but did not lessen the feeling that this is a high-quality book. Recommendable to anyone interested in military history in general and also people interested in the military events underpinning the 1800s.
June 2, 2013
A wonderful companion work to understanding Clausewitz's "On War." If you are reading and studying Clausewitz, then this may be one of the best companion books for that study. If you are not studying Clausewitz, but are seeking a sort of "Cliff Notes" or "Clausewitz for Dummies" then this might suffice. But seriously, if you want to understand Clausewitz, you have to read "On War" and a variety of companion works or commentaries - there are no short cuts.
Over an excellent book that helps to put Clausewitz's masterpiece in perspective. I read it with the Peter Pater translation of "On War" and found it very useful.
Over an excellent book that helps to put Clausewitz's masterpiece in perspective. I read it with the Peter Pater translation of "On War" and found it very useful.
February 13, 2014
An often-times interesting commentary on an interesting, and very influential book: I have some frustrations, nonetheless. I felt that Mr Strachan's book lacked a coherency, and, while containing insights and background, lacked an overall structure. Although, perhaps, this is due to the nature in which I consumed the book--namely, via audiobook, in small chunks. I'm going to give this book another chance in dead-tree format, probably around the time that I next read Clausewitz himself and am open to revising my judgement at that time.
December 20, 2008
This was a good introduction to On War and a helpful overview of issues addressed therein and their relevance over the past couple of centuries. It was effective in motivating me to want to take on On War (which is 8 books long), although it was disappointing to learn that the author does not find any of the English translations up to his standards.
June 11, 2013
This was a great read. I dove into the actual On War before reading this biography, and I think that's the best order to do it. Strachan does a great job of granting perspective on who Clausewitz was and his main points throughout the books. Definitely value-added in continuing a study of Uncle Carl.
June 4, 2014
Despite not being the most well-read student of Clausewitz, I thoroughly enjoyed this book. It does an outstanding job of highlighting and giving context to several of the obscure or even contradictory aspects of On War.
July 29, 2017
While Strachan jumps all over the place in offering his arguments, the book serves as an accessible and fairly comprehensive overview of Clausewitz's On War.
March 30, 2016
A very good summation of the genesis and theories in On War.
May 15, 2016
I think Clausewitz is a fascinating character. The book has some very good parts, however, it does not flow well.
Read
February 3, 2019Audible Audiobook
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20 reviews