~Good flavor, but needed more time in the oven~
The Crown Prophecy is a cozy romantasy that is reminiscent of The Selection or the first book of Throne of Glass. I also got a bit of a Serpent and Dove vibe but to a lesser extent.
I picked up The Crown Prophecy because I have followed the author on YouTube for a few years. Generally, I enjoyed the book and found it to be a page turner.
——
Positives:
Cozy details
The baking scenes
Quinn is great at self-regulating and I loved seeing that depicted by a MC in a novel.
Some of the comforting conversations/dialogue. (However, this can be overused and overapplied to characters it does not suit)
The last quarter of the book was really exciting and engaging!!
Negatives:
Build-up/Pay-off is too short to have meaning.
Several instances of Chekov’s gun needed to be placed much in advance. For example, hints that Quinn may have a Gift should have been peppered in throughout the early sections of the book. It is explained later why she didn’t feel her Gift because of how her mother had halpyerite at the cottage, but there should have been allusions to Quinn feeling more energized when she is away from home and sluggish or disconnected from herself when she is at the cottage. Similarly, she should feel particularly energized / more herself when she is at the castle because of everyone’s heightened powers because of the queen. Speaking of halpyerite, the reader should have been made aware of its existence much in advance. Similarly, how had we never known that Siphons existed until more than 75% through the book? I feel like this is an important power to be aware of so that the tension can appropriately build throughout the book. We, as the readers, can learn about the intricacies of the world and then are able to draw our own conclusions or hypotheses as we read. Having proper setup makes watching the dominoes fall all the more satisfying. A great example of good setup and payoff is in House of Earth and Blood when the concept of The Drop is explained at the very beginning of the book and specifically how no one has every done it alone and lived and then we get to see what that looks like at the end of the book.
One-note characters.
Unfortunately, I think just about all of the characters suffer from this, but particularly it is most noticeable in Quinn and Evander.
We are told that Quinn is hot-headed and we see little other descriptors for her (even as she prepares for the wedding, it’s the only attribute she can ascribe to herself). However, also it is often incongruent with how she acts, particularly with her mother and other characters like Georgette. We often see a meek Quinn. Also, for someone who is so hot-tempered, she is remarkably good at self-regulating?? It would have been cute for Quinn to acknowledge that she needs self-regulating techniques so she doesn’t fly off the handle at everyone but… we don’t get that… so instead we’re left feeling confused as to why someone who is good at self-regulating is also described as being a hothead. We know that Quinn is a baker by profession and a non-Wielder, but even both of those change partway through the book. Of course characters, especially main characters, are supposed to evolve, but we did not have a strong sense of who Quinn was at the start and so it is hard to say who she becomes at the end.
Evander is like the classic fantasy genre prince. Brooding for a few scenes but then utterly devoted to our FMC. Wants to have more control within his day-to-day which is ironic because he rules a kingdom. Maybe we could also say he’s bad gift giver because who gives someone who can’t play an instrument some sheet music? (I’m sorry, I know this was supposed to be a sweet moment, but it felt flat for me. It felt like a bad attempt to replicate Dorian gifting Celaena sheet music but that moment had much more meaning because it was established that Dorian knew Celaena had both a love of music and the latter has musical prowess, specifically on piano).
Quinn’s mom also gets so little attention that she is a flimsy Mother Gothel copy.
Other characters can also be pretty insubstantial, like Serena is an unrealistic mean girl who flips to liking the FMC later in the book.
These flat characters become harder to reconcile with as the plot marches forward because as characters profess their love for each other, you don’t feel like you know them so how could you love them the way they love each other? How can you mourn complex enemies if they were never complex to begin with?
On a more positive note, I did enjoy Colette and Vanessa as characters. I felt they were genuine and interesting.
Tells but doesn’t Show.
This is very true for Quinn and her mother’s relationship. We hear so much about how Quinn and her mother fight, but we only see it one time (and it’s a good fight so it’s a shame we don’t get more!) We hear that Quinn and her mom love each other, but we never see tender moments so we have no proof that they love each other. Quinn’s mom has no redeeming qualities, so when she dies, I have no sympathy for her. Show us why they love each other and show us how they have fought in the past so we can understand how their relationship now.
People gossip that Evander is arrogant, but we never see why people would think that. When we meet Rhys in ACOTAR or Cardan in Cruel Prince, we see immediately why they have their reputations. The reason we’re given is because he’s a prince and hasn’t married yet and is therefore probably self-entitled, which feels pretty thin, especially because again, it’s just gossip. It’s not an action we see take place. Quinn dislikes Evander from the start because of this and so it just feels lazy. What would have been more believable if Quinn acknowledged some sort of prejudice leftover from her mother.
Lack of clarity for the plot/world throughout.
This is the most glaring issues for me. If the magic is just “party tricks”, then why are people being kidnapped over it? Does Marisol need to be worried about getting nabbed because she can change the color of a fabric? Some Gifts obviously have military benefit, but other Gifts are very innocuous. The magic system is never clearly defined, which causes the world to fall apart. In other fantasy media where people have powers like Shadow and Bone (Grishaverse as a whole) or Avatar: The Last Airbender, the magic system is immediately defined and power levels/maximums are generally understood early on. It seems there were attempts because “green-Wielding” seem to be a thing, but is there blue-Wielding? Is it called red-Wielding or fire-Wielding? Neither are applied to the character who has a fire Gift.
Class is also not defined. It is totally unclear for most of the book whether it is normal for royals to marry commoners, and even more so what a “commoner” even is in this world. One guy gives a stink about it after the wedding and Georgette seems to have some prejudice but also there are girls in the competition that would be of a similar class as Quinn. Why would a tailor’s daughter be fine to marry a prince but not a merchant’s daughter? Just because Quinn worked in the castle? What if the tailor was the royal tailor? Would that invalidate his daughter from the competition?
There was an attempt to define the world politics, namely with the main antagonist Farion/Orobos but without having the above defined, it’s really hard to contextualize the stakes. Some of it is forgiveable because Quinn is a baker so she wouldn’t need to know politics within her kingdom.
Lack of consistency.
I think Mundane is only used in the first chapter and then Non-Wielder is used up until three-quarters of the way through and then we start to see Mundane again. One of the other reviews I read commented on how the book begins as something that would be appropriate for middle/high school age readers, but then remembers it could be more adult and starts adding swear words and there are some sexually explicit scenes. Of course one is not superior to the other, but it is just inconsistent. Also, some language has been changed to sound more appropriate for the fantasy/pre-industrialization setting, but others have not. Words/phrases like “comfort zone”, “kitten heels” and “prep” (instead of prepare) sit at odds with phrasing like “bed chamber”, “doublet”, and “pianoforte”.
Typos.
I read the digital version from B&N and there were a few quite minor typos. Typos can happen in books by major publishers too, but I think unfortunately this pointed to a recurring QA/QC issue.
——
This is a super long review and I don’t write this all to be mean-spirited or say that I hated the book. On the contrary, I enjoyed reading The Crown Prophecy! My review is coming from a place of love and genuine desire to see improvement in the author’s future books. I believe in Meg Acuna as a writer, I think she definitely has the chops, but I also think that there is room for refinement. Not everyone may agree with my review, plenty of others have given the book five stars. If the author ends up reading my review, please take this all with a grain of salt as you wrote a whole book, I merely wrote a review.
I look forward to reading the next installment in Quinn and Evander’s story and any future series that may come out down the line.