I honestly wasn't expecting a new contender for favorite Wildbow book, but for Claw he changed his format, style, and tone quite a bit and I think it largely was a huge success. Typically, he writes insanely long form books, this one could be finished comfortably in a month or two. Typically, they're full of fantastic powers, this one has a realism throughout, characters limited in power that take beatings and really have to recover from them. The environment is hyperdystopian, but it's still awfully real too, taking note of a lot of the worst news stories and just tweaking them a little-- believably our universe with a couple pendulums swinging the wrong way at the wrong time for a little too long and toppling the stability of institutions. All of this made for a great change of pace and a valuable experiment which I hope he can carry over the lessons from to future works.
I think I've said in past reviews that Wildbow is best at the small-scale character drama and development, but that in his work this talent comes into conflict with a desire to always be escalating and to have spectacular, climatic, city-level conflicts which to me get so big and chaotic that as a reader its a muddle to get through. This book thrives because, even in its biggest scale scenes, it does not lose track of the interpersonal heart of the book.
The central family drama + moral dilemma is really compelling and even in this shorter format, Wildbow is able to explore it in full. I would say he also often falls prey to making his hateable characters cartoonishly hateable, and while I felt that way about Natalie for a while, by the end he successfully got me as a reader to still empathize and be invested in her development. The moral ambiguity which a lot of readers attribute (to me a little generously) to his other works was here I think fully effectively done, again I believe thanks to the realistic moral mess of a setting and having protagonists who aren't really doing their best to be good people, but instead operate according to their own backwards-rationalized moral code.
The only light criticism I have, other than a couple of to me dud action chapters, is that there are moments where the pacing stumbles and the story seems to pick up pace a little too suddenly or a storyline is wrapped up too fast. I think these are understandable hiccups for an author who until this point wrote books that were like 20 novels long and is now pivoting to a work that's maybe 2-3 books long. The pros of making a focused, condensed work much outweighed the cons and he honestly continues to be my favorite fiction writer of the present day.